IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v57y2023i4p1623-1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we really know about “don't know”? Re‐assessing the measurement of financial knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa J. Wilmarth
  • Kyoung Tae Kim
  • Tae‐Young Pak

Abstract

Survey protocols measuring financial knowledge typically offer a don't know (DK) response option along with factual statements about personal finance. The potential problem of this practice is that a DK response could capture something other than financial knowledge and mislead empirical research on the association between financial knowledge and behavioral outcomes. In this study, we examined whether the current scales are contaminated by systemic personality effects and how reduced validity influences analytical modeling of the knowledge effect. Two studies with different national datasets were conducted in this investigation. Study 1 found that personality types and emotions are partially correlated with the propensity to give a DK response. Study 2 showed that controlling for DK response options alters the association between financial knowledge and behaviors in regression analyses. Our findings suggest that a DK response reduces construct validity of the financial knowledge score.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa J. Wilmarth & Kyoung Tae Kim & Tae‐Young Pak, 2023. "What do we really know about “don't know”? Re‐assessing the measurement of financial knowledge," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 1623-1649, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:57:y:2023:i:4:p:1623-1649
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12563
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:57:y:2023:i:4:p:1623-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.