IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v27y2023i1p71-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of biomass flows in Bangladesh (1961–2019): Providing insights for Bangladesh's transition to a sustainable circular bioeconomy

Author

Listed:
  • Afra Bashira Binth Arman
  • Fridolin Krausmann
  • Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain
  • Mohammad Sujauddin

Abstract

The transition toward a circular bioeconomy requires policy directives based on comprehensive research on biomass in the context of region‐specific economic, societal, and environmental realities. Bangladesh, a densely populated country with an agrarian economy morphing rapidly into an industrial one, needs a critical evaluation of its biomass metabolism to enable local and global policy stakeholders in setting rational biomass‐associated targets with policy pushes to achieve them. This article addresses the apparent research gap in the bioeconomy aspiration of Bangladesh by applying a systems perspective to quantify the extraction and use of biomass through economy‐wide material flow analysis. The results indicate a twofold increase in domestic extraction of biomass in Bangladesh between 1961 and 2019. Bangladesh shows one of the highest rates of biomass extraction worldwide—a staggering 13 t/ha in 2019. Although the import dependency (currently at 9% of domestic material input) and consumption of animal products (4% of total calorie supply in 2018) in the country are comparatively low, both are increasing at scale. A further increase in the demand for food, in particular animal products, is evident from trends in population growth and dietary change. Apparently, the scope to expand the production of primary biomass for material and energy application seems limited. Rather, as the outcomes of this paper entail, circular bioeconomy strategies for Bangladesh should focus on creating a resilient and sustainable food system, reducing waste flows, cascadic use of crop residues, and so on, taking trade‐offs between ecological, social, and economic goals into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Afra Bashira Binth Arman & Fridolin Krausmann & Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain & Mohammad Sujauddin, 2023. "The evolution of biomass flows in Bangladesh (1961–2019): Providing insights for Bangladesh's transition to a sustainable circular bioeconomy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 71-83, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:71-83
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13338
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swinda F. Pfau & Janneke E. Hagens & Ben Dankbaar & Antoine J. M. Smits, 2014. "Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Monirul Islam Miskat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Piyal Chowdhury & Sadiq M. Sait & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Assessing the Theoretical Prospects of Bioethanol Production as a Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Bangladesh: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Beate El-Chichakli & Joachim von Braun & Christine Lang & Daniel Barben & Jim Philp, 2016. "Policy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7611), pages 221-223, July.
    4. Szarka, Nora & Haufe, Henryk & Lange, Nora & Schier, Franziska & Weimar, Holger & Banse, Martin & Sturm, Viktoriya & Dammer, Lara & Piotrowski, Stephan & Thrän, Daniela, 2021. "Biomass flow in bioeconomy: Overview for Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Hermans, C. & Udo, H. M. J. & Dawood, F., 1989. "Cattle dynamics and their implications in Pabna district, Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 371-384.
    6. Bidhan Bhuson Roy & Rubel Biswas Chowdhury & Amit Robert Baroi & Shupa Rahman & Stephen M. Powers & Nick Milne & Mohammad Sujauddin, 2019. "Unravelling the anthropogenic pathways of phosphorus in the food production and consumption system of Bangladesh through the lens of substance flow analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(6), pages 1439-1455, December.
    7. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    8. Horta Nogueira, Luiz Augusto & Moreira, Jose Roberto & Schuchardt, Ulf & Goldemberg, Jose, 2013. "The rationality of biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 595-598.
    9. Krausmann, Fridolin & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Gingrich, Simone & Lauk, Christian & Haberl, Helmut, 2008. "Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 471-487, April.
    10. Sukamal Sarkar & Milan Skalicky & Akbar Hossain & Marian Brestic & Saikat Saha & Sourav Garai & Krishnendu Ray & Koushik Brahmachari, 2020. "Management of Crop Residues for Improving Input Use Efficiency and Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Khondoker A. Mottaleb & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Gideon Kruseman & Olaf Erenstein, 2018. "Wheat Production and Consumption Dynamics in an Asian Rice Economy: The Bangladesh Case," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(2), pages 252-275, April.
    12. Shamsuddin Shahid & Houshang Behrawan, 2008. "Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 46(3), pages 391-413, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuezhou Wen & Daniel Quacoe & Dinah Quacoe & Kingsley Appiah & Bertha Ada Danso, 2019. "Analysis on Bioeconomy’s Contribution to GDP: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. D'Amato, Dalia & Veijonaho, Simo & Toppinen, Anne, 2020. "Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen-Kurki, K. & Lyytikainen, V. & Matthies, B.D. & Horcea-Milcu, A-I., 2022. "Circular bioeconomy: Actors and dynamics of knowledge co-production in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Infante-Amate, Juan & Aguilera, Eduardo & Palmeri, Francesco & Guzmán, Gloria & Soto, David & García-Ruiz, Roberto & de Molina, Manuel González, 2018. "Land embodied in Spain’s biomass trade and consumption (1900–2008): Historical changes, drivers and impacts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 493-502.
    7. Alexander Urrego-Mesa & Juan Infante-Amate & Enric Tello, 2018. "Pastures and Cash Crops: Biomass Flows in the Socio-Metabolic Transition of Twentieth-Century Colombian Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Sotiropoulou, Irene & Deutz, Pauline, 2021. "Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 10(4), December.
    10. Daniel Callo-Concha & Hannah Jaenicke & Christine B. Schmitt & Manfred Denich, 2020. "Food and Non-Food Biomass Production, Processing and Use in sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a Regional Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-9, March.
    11. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Ayrapetyan, David, 2023. "Technological innovations and sustainability transitions in the bioeconomy: A multiscalar approach toward the development of bioclusters," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 278703, September.
    13. Genovaitė Liobikienė & Ričardas Krikštolaitis & Astrida Miceikienė, 2023. "The main determinants of changes in biomass extraction: the decomposition analysis approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7987-8003, August.
    14. Manuel González de Molina & David Soto Fernández & Juan Infante-Amate & Eduardo Aguilera & Jaime Vila Traver & Gloria I. Guzmán, 2017. "Decoupling Food from Land: The Evolution of Spanish Agriculture from 1960 to 2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. P. J. Stephenson & Anca Damerell, 2022. "Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Eva Cudlínová & Valny Giacomelli Sobrinho & Miloslav Lapka & Luca Salvati, 2020. "New Forms of Land Grabbing Due to the Bioeconomy: The Case of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Akter, Mst. Mahmoda & Surovy, Israt Zahan & Sultana, Nazmin & Faruk, Md. Omar & Gilroyed, Brandon H. & Tijing, Leonard & Arman, & Didar-ul-Alam, Md. & Shon, Ho Kyong & Nam, Sang Yong & Kabir, Mohammad, 2024. "Techno-economics and environmental sustainability of agricultural biomass-based energy potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    18. Marianne Duquenne & Hélène Prost & Joachim Schöpfel & Franck Dumeignil, 2020. "Open Bioeconomy—A Bibliometric Study on the Accessibility of Articles in the Field of Bioeconomy," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Goetz, Ariane & Searchinger, Tim & Beringer, Tim & German, Laura & McKay, Ben & Oliveira, Gustavo de L.T. & Hunsberger, Carol, 2018. "Reply to commentary on the special issue Scaling up biofuels? A critical look at expectations, performance and governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 658-665.
    20. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.