IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020is3p73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhetorical Appeals and Strategic Cooptation in the Rise and Fall of The New International Economic Order

Author

Listed:
  • Orfeo Fioretos

Abstract

The global governance institutions that structure economic relations between industrialized and developing countries have been contested since their inception. This contribution revisits elements of the struggle over the ‘new international economic order’, or NIEO, in the 1970s. Contemporaneous observers and political leaders saw the initiative as part of the first major shift in global power after 1945. Using strategies of rhetorical coercion and persuasion that aimed to radically reform global economic governance, a large coalition of developing nations proposed a reform agenda designed to expand the authority of the United Nations and reduce the importance of Bretton Woods institutions. In response, a small coalition of industrialized countries adopted strategies of cooptation that entailed ‘case‐by‐case’ cooperation with developing countries with the goal of limiting overall reforms. The contribution uses historical archives from deliberations within and among industrialized countries to reveal the sources behind their response to the NIEO and follow‐up initiatives. It shows that industrialized countries chose to deemphasize strategies of argumentation in favor of strategies of cooptation in their efforts to limit transformative change in global economic governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Orfeo Fioretos, 2020. "Rhetorical Appeals and Strategic Cooptation in the Rise and Fall of The New International Economic Order," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 73-82, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s3:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orfeo Fioretos, 2019. "Minilateralism and informality in international monetary cooperation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1136-1159, November.
    2. Kaya,Ayse, 2015. "Power and Global Economic Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107120945, October.
    3. Cox, Robert W., 1979. "Ideologies and the New International Economic Order: reflections on some recent literature," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 257-302, April.
    4. Andreas Kruck & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 5-16, October.
    5. Matthew D. Stephen & Kathrin Stephen, 2020. "The Integration of Emerging Powers into Club Institutions: China and the Arctic Council," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 51-60, October.
    6. Stephen, Matthew D. & Stephen, Kathrin, 2020. "The Integration of Emerging Powers into Club Institutions: China and the Arctic Council," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(S3), pages 51-60.
    7. Lora Anne Viola, 2020. "US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 28-39, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lora Anne Viola, 2020. "US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 28-39, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Beeson & Jolanta Hewitt, 2022. "Does Multilateralism still Matter? ASEAN and the Arctic Council in Comparative Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 208-218, May.
    2. Lora Anne Viola, 2020. "US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 28-39, October.
    3. Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "China's New Multilateral Institutions: A Framework and Research Agenda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 807-834.
    4. Nadezhda Filimonova & Anastassia Obydenkova & Vinicius G. Rodrigues Vieira, 2023. "Geopolitical and economic interests in environmental governance: explaining observer state status in the Arctic Council," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. L. G. Karanatova & A. Yu. Kulev, 2022. "Socio-Economic Development of the Arctic: Modern Challenges and Priorities," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 2.
    6. Ayse Kaya, 2016. "Graham Bird and Dane Rowlands. 2016. The International Monetary Fund: Distinguishing Reality from Rhetoric (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 391-395, September.
    7. Henrik Selin & Bjorn-Ola Linner, 2005. "The Quest for Global Sustainability: International Efforts on Linking Environment and Development," CID Working Papers 5, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    8. P. Giannoccolo, 2004. "The Brain Drain. A Survey of the Literature," Working Papers 526, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    9. Richard Higgott & Simon Reich, 2022. "The age of fuzzy bifurcation: Lessons from the pandemic and the Ukraine War," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 627-639, November.
    10. Max‐Otto Baumann & Sebastian Haug & Silke Weinlich, 2024. "From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 51-61, May.
    11. Oliver Westerwinter & Kenneth W. Abbott & Thomas Biersteker, 2021. "Informal governance in world politics," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Mark Copelovitch & Jon C. W. Pevehouse, 2019. "International organizations in a new era of populist nationalism," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 169-186, June.
    13. Christopher Kilby & Carolyn McWhirter, 2022. "The World Bank COVID-19 response: Politics as usual?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 627-656, July.
    14. David Goldsworthy, 1988. "Thinking Politically about Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 505-530, July.
    15. Diosey Ramon Lugo-Morin, 2021. "Global Future: Low-Carbon Economy or High-Carbon Economy?," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Eugenia C. Heldt & Thomas Dörfler, 2022. "Orchestrating private investors for development: How the World Bank revitalizes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1382-1398, October.
    17. Krishna Satyanarayana & Deepak Chandrashekar & Bala Subrahmanya Mungila Hillemane, 2021. "An Assessment of Competitiveness of Technology-Based Startups in India," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 28-38, June.
    18. Christopher M. Dent, 2022. "Neoliberal Environmentalism, Climate Interventionism and the Trade-Climate Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Georgios Maris & Ioannis Kalaitzidis, 2024. "China, Greece, and Economic Relations in Southeast Europe: A Political Economy Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Xu, Jiajun. 2017. Beyond US Hegemony in International Development: The Contest for Influence at the World Bank. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 491-495, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s3:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.