IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v58y1982i3p242-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics and the Arts: A Review of Seven Years

Author

Listed:
  • C. D. THROSBY

Abstract

Contributions to the literature on the economics of the arts are reviewed covering the period 1975 to date. It is argued that although the work surveyed is uneven in quality and incomplete in its coverage, it has made sufficient impact to establish the economics of the arts as a significant area in the development of economic theory and analysis. The paper assesses the importance and relevance of work carried out in four broad areas of study: the role of government in arts markets; the operations of funding agencies; the production of arts goods and services; and consumer behaviour and demand for private consumption in the arts.

Suggested Citation

  • C. D. Throsby, 1982. "Economics and the Arts: A Review of Seven Years," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 58(3), pages 242-252, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:58:y:1982:i:3:p:242-252
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1982.tb00372.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1982.tb00372.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1982.tb00372.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Withers, 2013. "Broadcasting," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 36, pages 409-415, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. repec:bla:scandj:v:81:y:1979:i:2:p:142-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Seaman, Bruce A, 1981. "Economic Theory and the Positive Economics of Arts Financing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(2), pages 335-340, May.
    4. M. Davenport & G. Studdert‐Kennedy, 1972. "The Statistical Analysis of Aesthetic Judgment: An Exploration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(3), pages 324-333, November.
    5. McCain, Roger A, 1981. "Cultivation of Taste, Catastrophe Theory, and the Demand for Works of Art," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(2), pages 332-334, May.
    6. Peacock, Alan T, 1969. "Welfare Economics and Public Subsidies to the Arts," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 37(4), pages 323-335, December.
    7. Peter Bohm, 1979. "Estimating willingness to pay: Why and how?," Framed Field Experiments 00127, The Field Experiments Website.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jenkins, Stephen & Austen-Smith, David, 1987. "Interdependent decision-making in non-profit industries: A simultaneous equation analysis of English provincial theatre," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 149-174.
    2. Shabbar Jaffry & Alexandros Apostolakis, 2011. "Evaluating individual preferences for the British Museum," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 49-75, February.
    3. David Austen‐Smith, 1984. "Subsidies to the Arts with Multiple Public Donors," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(4), pages 381-389, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Ginsburgh, 2013. "Mark Blaug and the economics of the arts," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 15, pages 208-224, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Christian Jaramillo, 2009. "Research and Development in Culture: A Case for Cross Subsidies in the Arts," Documentos CEDE 5346, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    4. Henk Folmer & Olof Johansson-Stenman, 2011. "Does Environmental Economics Produce Aeroplanes Without Engines? On the Need for an Environmental Social Science," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 337-361, March.
    5. Luciano Monti & Roberto Cerroni, 2019. "How the Widespread Presence of Historical Private Real Estate Can Contribute to Local Development," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 183-183, December.
    6. Badia, Francesco, 2011. "Contents and Aims of Management Plans for World Heritage Sites: Managerial Analysis with a Special Focus on the Italian Scenario," MPRA Paper 36686, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Michael Getzner, 2002. "Determinants of Public Cultural Expenditures: An Exploratory Time Series Analysis for Austria," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(4), pages 287-306, November.
    8. Ilde Rizzo & Ruth Towse, 2015. "In memoriam Alan Peacock: a pioneer in cultural economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 225-238, August.
    9. J.D. Snowball & G.G. Antrobus, 2001. "Measuring The Value Of The Arts To Society: The Importance Of The Value Of Externalities For Lower Income And Education Groups In South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 752-766, December.
    10. Rushton, Michael, 2019. "Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Michael Hutter, 1996. "The impact of cultural economics on economic theory," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(4), pages 263-268, December.
    12. Bruno S. Frey, "undated". "What Values Should Count in the Arts? The Tension between Economic Effects and Cultural Value," IEW - Working Papers 253, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    13. Glenn W. Harrison & John A. List, 2004. "Field Experiments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1009-1055, December.
    14. Sangho KIM & Donghyun PARK, 2010. "Addictive behavior in cinema demand: evidence from Korea," Economic Growth Centre Working Paper Series 1002, Nanyang Technological University, School of Social Sciences, Economic Growth Centre.
    15. Frey, Bruno S. & Meier, Stephan, 2006. "The Economics of Museums," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 29, pages 1017-1047, Elsevier.
    16. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2018. "How free admittance affects charged visits to museums: an analysis of the Italian case," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 70(3), pages 680-698.
    17. Bilyana Tomova, 2004. "Market Failures in the Area of Art (The Case of Performing Arts)," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 72-89.
    18. William J. Baumol, 2011. "Application of Welfare Economics," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Francois Bonnieux & Dominique Vermersch, 1993. "Bénéfices et coûts de la protection de l'eau : application de l'approche contingente à la pêche sportive," Post-Print hal-01594132, HAL.
    20. Günther Schulze & Anselm Rose, 1998. "Public Orchestra Funding in Germany – An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(4), pages 227-247, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:58:y:1982:i:3:p:242-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.