IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v91y2024i364p1201-1221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More dads at home, more girls in maths‐intensive studies? Evidence from a parental leave reform

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Mikkelsen
  • Noemi Peter

Abstract

Evidence suggests that separate spheres gender norms discourage girls from maths. We therefore examine a policy that counteracts such norms among parents, and investigate whether it increases girls' participation in maths‐intensive studies. Specifically, we examine a parental leave reform that reserved one month of leave for fathers, and estimate its effect on children's study choices. We find that the reform increases the probability of doing a maths‐intensive programme in upper secondary education among girls whose father was otherwise reluctant to take leave. There is no effect on boys. We also conduct heterogeneity analyses to investigate whether the results can be explained by human capital transmission or the gender norms mechanism. The results of our analyses suggest that the gender norms mechanism is at play.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Mikkelsen & Noemi Peter, 2024. "More dads at home, more girls in maths‐intensive studies? Evidence from a parental leave reform," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(364), pages 1201-1221, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:91:y:2024:i:364:p:1201-1221
    DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12547
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecca.12547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:91:y:2024:i:364:p:1201-1221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.