IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022is2ne12671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Diepeveen
  • Melanie Pinet

Abstract

Motivation In a polarizing world, the spread of “fake news” and mis/disinformation is a cause of concern for young people's wellbeing, as they are at the forefront of the use and consumption of digital media. The article focuses on how young people view and respond to misinformation online, and the role of digital literacy interventions to mitigate this challenge. Purpose The analysis aims to provide some initial insights on how young people view and respond to misinformation online, based on open‐ended online consultations, and consider what their ideas and experiences imply for whether and how digital literacy interventions can help mitigate the impact of “fake news” and mis/disinformation on young people's wellbeing. Approach and methods The empirical analysis is based on two online consultations, held in the early months of the Covid‐19 pandemic, that explore multiple views of young people on misinformation. The consultations were analysed for patterns and variation in how young people define the problem of misinformation, and consider digital literacy as a solution, for both men and women, and in different geographies globally. Findings Through the consultations, participants suggest a contextualized view of misinformation, both in terms of how it becomes problematic and mitigation strategies. Young people experienced misinformation in intersection with other issues in the digital public sphere, including cybersecurity and unequal access. Young people also reinforced a broad view of digital literacy that includes data literacy and digital citizenship. Policy implications Consultation participants challenge policy‐makers and practitioners to look more deeply at the factors contributing to misinformation, to expand their vision of young people's agency, and to incorporate these insights into designing digital literacy interventions that mitigate the harms of misinformation online, and enable young people to address harmful content online.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Diepeveen & Melanie Pinet, 2022. "User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S2), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:s2:n:e12671
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12671
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmi, Elinor & Yates, Simeon J., 2020. "What do digital inclusion and data literacy mean today?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Javier de la Garza Montemayor & Daniel Barredo Ibáñez & Mayra Elizabeth Brosig Rodríguez, 2023. "Digital Habits of Users in the Post-Pandemic Context: A Study on the Transition of Mexican Internet and Media Users from the Monterrey Metropolitan Area," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Gritsenko, Daria, 2024. "Advancing UN digital cooperation: Lessons from environmental policy and governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Sophia D'Angelo, 2022. "Building resilience now and for the future: Adolescent skills to address global challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S2), October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahim Zarouali & Natali Helberger & Claes H. de Vreese, 2021. "Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 134-144.
    2. Kira Allmann & Roxana Radu, 2023. "Digital footprints as barriers to accessing e‐government services," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 84-94, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:s2:n:e12671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.