IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v9y2021i4p134-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?

Author

Listed:
  • Brahim Zarouali

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Natali Helberger

    (Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Claes H. de Vreese

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey ( N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Brahim Zarouali & Natali Helberger & Claes H. de Vreese, 2021. "Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 134-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:134-144
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:134-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.