IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v39y2021i6p990-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visions, promises and understandings of development around Kenya’s Masinga reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • William Clelland

Abstract

Motivation Utilitarian visions of societal transformation often drive decisions about large infrastructure projects. However, such visions mask the heterogeneity of encounters with the projects and fail to consider lasting impacts on communities whose lives they can disrupt. Further, it is seldom considered that such communities need to anticipate the future to manage the changes they will experience. Purpose This article considers how the trajectories of change experienced by people living in the vicinity of a major infrastructure project have shaped their visions of development. In addition, it examines how interested parties (or stakeholders) can work together to look beyond the project and stimulate further development opportunities. Approach and Methods Drawing on fieldwork at Masinga dam and reservoir in Kenya, the research privileged local experiences and longer‐term views of this hydropower development, 40 years after construction work began. A mixed‐methods research design was used to understand how Masinga reservoir and the associated development discourse have been assimilated locally. Findings Although the water associated with Masinga reservoir has been accepted by a nearby community, inequitable access and poor stakeholder relations resulted in the project failing to act as a catalyst for subsequent inclusive development. Past and present conflicts over access to water and land have generated a chronic environment of distrust and short‐term, individualistic visions of development. However, when people consider how things could be then visions of community‐driven development can emerge. Policy Implications For infrastructure projects to stimulate lasting community development, the heterogeneity of encounters and longer‐term impact on both the environment and social relations must be considered. Moreover, development authorities should explicitly raise the visibility of issues faced by the full range of stakeholders. With a resurgence of interest in large hydropower schemes, policies that encourage stakeholders to develop a common vision of what lies beyond a project is critical to achieving equitable and sustainable change.

Suggested Citation

  • William Clelland, 2021. "Visions, promises and understandings of development around Kenya’s Masinga reservoir," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(6), pages 990-1007, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:39:y:2021:i:6:p:990-1007
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12536
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noora†Lisa Aberman & Julia Behrman & Regina Birner, 2018. "Gendered perceptions of power and decision†making in rural Kenya," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(4), pages 389-407, July.
    2. Chambers, R. & Conway, G. R., 1991. "Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century," IWMI Books, Reports H032821, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Frances Cleaver, 1999. "Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 597-612.
    4. Deribe Assefa Aga & N. Noorderhaven & B. Vallejo, 2018. "Project beneficiary participation and behavioural intentions promoting project sustainability: The mediating role of psychological ownership," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(5), pages 527-546, September.
    5. Amrita Chhachhi & Tim Forsyth & Craig Johnson, 2014. "Elinor Ostrom's Legacy: Governing the Commons and the Rational Choice Controversy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 1093-1110, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jupolli, Majlinda, 2017. "Planning and Management Issues in Sharr Mountains National Park, Kosovo: livelihoods of local communities and their perceptions," Thesis Commons 36h9n, Center for Open Science.
    2. John Briggs & Joanne Sharp & Hoda Yacoub & Nabila Hamed & Alan Roe, 2007. "The nature of indigenous environmental knowledge production: evidence from Bedouin communities in southern Egypt," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 239-251.
    3. Alisa Moldavanova & Tamaki Onishi & Stefan Toepler, 2023. "Civil society and democratization: The role of service‐providing organizations amid closing civic spaces," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(1), pages 3-13, February.
    4. Ghazala Mansuri, 2004. "Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 1-39.
    5. Arts, Bas & de Koning, Jessica, 2017. "Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 315-325.
    6. Pelenc, Jérôme & Bazile, Didier & Ceruti, Cristian, 2015. "Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: A case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 226-239.
    7. Ansoms, An & McKay, Andrew, 2010. "A quantitative analysis of poverty and livelihood profiles: The case of rural Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 584-598, December.
    8. Surya Gyawali & Sudarshan Raj Tiwari & Sushil Bahadur Bajracharya & Hans Narve Skotte, 2020. "Promoting sustainable livelihoods: An approach to postdisaster reconstruction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 626-633, July.
    9. Goel, Sanjay & Mazzola, Pietro & Phan, Phillip H. & Pieper, Torsten M. & Zachary, Ramona K., 2012. "Strategy, ownership, governance, and socio-psychological perspectives on family businesses from around the world," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 54-65.
    10. Benjamin Bathfield & Pierre Gasselin & Rémy Vandame & Santiago López-Ridaura & Luís García Barrios, 2010. "Adaptation de la gestion technique des producteurs de café et de miel face aux variations de prix au Guatemala : concepts et méthodes," Post-Print hal-00783500, HAL.
    11. Bruno Benzaquen Perosa & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Mateus Batistella, 2024. "Market Access and Agricultural Diversification: An Analysis of Brazilian Municipalities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Danai Manyumwa, Harrison & Siziba, Shephard & Unganai, Leonard & Mapfumo, Paul & Mtambanengwe, Florence, 2018. "The impacts of community-based cash management tools on smallholder rural farmers’ access to livelihood assets," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), June.
    13. Aoudji, Augustin K. N. & Kindozoun, Prudence & Adegbidi, Anselme & Ganglo, Jean C., 2017. "Land Access and Household Food Security in Kpomassè District, Southern Benin: A Few Lessons for Smallholder Agriculture Interventions," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(4), November.
    14. Lindsay C. Stringer & Mark S. Reed & Andrew J. Dougill & Mary K. Seely & Martin Rokitzki, 2007. "Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(3), pages 198-211, August.
    15. Kwok-Fu Wong, 2003. "Empowerment as a panacea for poverty - old wine in new bottles? Reflections on the World Bank’s conception of power," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(4), pages 307-322, October.
    16. Markus Kantsperger & Hannes Thees & Christian Eckert, 2019. "Local Participation in Tourism Development—Roles of Non-Tourism Related Residents of the Alpine Destination Bad Reichenhall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Isyaku, Usman, 2021. "What motivates communities to participate in forest conservation? A study of REDD+ pilot sites in Cross River, Nigeria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Nkonya, Ephraim & Phillip, Dayo & Mogues, Tewodaj & Pender, John & Yahaya, Muhammed Kuta & Adebowale, Gbenga & Arokoyo, Tunji & Kato, Edward, 2008. "From the ground up: Impacts of a pro-poor community-driven development project in Nigeria," IFPRI discussion papers 756, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Venda Louise Pollock & Joanne Sharp, 2012. "Real Participation or the Tyranny of Participatory Practice? Public Art and Community Involvement in the Regeneration of the Raploch, Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3063-3079, November.
    20. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:39:y:2021:i:6:p:990-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.