IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v55y2024i3p429-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dependency in the Digital Age? The Experience of Mercado Libre in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastián Fernández Franco
  • Juan M. Graña
  • Cecilia Rikap

Abstract

This article uses Mercado Libre, the leading digital platform company in Latin America, as an illustrative case to analyse the effect of regional platforms on development, by considering their interplay with both global leaders and local actors. Building on dependency theory, the article identifies the company's structural dependence on algorithms and computing power provided by the largest information technology (Big Tech) companies in the United States. Nonetheless, it also finds that Mercado Libre is at the frontier in applied data analysis solutions tailored for its businesses. Together with a privileged access to personalized and cross‐fertilized market and financial datasets, the company's internal and purchassed technologies are the source of asymmetric relationships with its platforms’ users. The article conceptualizes Mercado Libre's place in digital capitalism as extractivist with local actors and, just like local elites when dependency theory was first formulated, it is complicit with global powers. But, unlike those elite firms, it is not technologically laggard, and its value capture is underpinned by its technological advantage. Thus, this article conceptualizes (digital) dependency as multiple layers of economic power in which leading firms from the peripheries occupy intermediate and interconnecting positions. It shows that, while these regional leaders operate at the technological frontier, economic power relations based on technological asymmetries remain crucial for studying underdevelopment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastián Fernández Franco & Juan M. Graña & Cecilia Rikap, 2024. "Dependency in the Digital Age? The Experience of Mercado Libre in Latin America," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 429-464, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:55:y:2024:i:3:p:429-464
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12839
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Langley & Andrew Leyshon, 2021. "The Platform Political Economy of FinTech: Reintermediation, Consolidation and Capitalisation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 376-388, May.
    2. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    3. Matthieu Montalban & Vincent Frigant & Bernard Jullien, 2019. "Platform economy as a new form of capitalism: a Régulationist research programme," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(4), pages 805-824.
    4. Ugo Pagano, 2014. "The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(6), pages 1409-1429.
    5. Zhongjin Li & Hao Qi, 2022. "Platform power: monopolisation and financialisation in the era of big tech," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1289-1314.
    6. Antonio Andreoni & Simon Roberts, 2022. "Governing digital platform power for industrial development: towards an entrepreneurial-regulatory state," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1431-1454.
    7. Feng Zhu & Qihong Liu, 2018. "Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2618-2642, October.
    8. Thomason Rajan, 2021. "The Flipkart Story in India: From the Start to Walmart," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 18(2), pages 126-143, September.
    9. Kai Koddenbrock & Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven & Ndongo Samba Sylla, 2022. "Beyond financialisation: the longue durée of finance and production in the Global South," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(4), pages 703-733.
    10. Reilly, Katherine, 2020. "Platform developmentalism: Leveraging platform innovation for national development in Latin America," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29.
    11. Peters, Ryan H. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2017. "Intangible capital and the investment-q relation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 251-272.
    12. Palma, Gabriel, 1978. "Dependency: A formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 6(7-8), pages 881-924.
    13. Mario Cimoli & Gabriel Porcile & Sebastián Rovira, 2010. "Structural change and the BOP-constraint: why did Latin America fail to converge?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(2), pages 389-411, March.
    14. Paulo L. Santos & Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, 2017. "Better than Cash, but Beware the Costs: Electronic Payments Systems and Financial Inclusion in Developing Economies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 48(2), pages 205-227, March.
    15. Heeks, Richard & Gomez-Morantes, Juan Erasmo & Graham, Mark & Howson, Kelle & Mungai, Paul & Nicholson, Brian & Van Belle, Jean-Paul, 2021. "Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke & Rikap, Cecilia, 2022. "China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    17. Dos Santos, Theotonio, 1970. "The Structure of Dependence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 231-236, May.
    18. Felipe Antunes de Oliveira & Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, 2023. "Back to Dakar: Decolonizing international political economy through dependency theory," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 1676-1700, September.
    19. Jongho Lee & Keun Lee, 2021. "Is the fourth industrial revolution a continuation of the third industrial revolution or something new under the sun? Analyzing technological regimes using US patent data [Vertical integration and ," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(1), pages 137-159.
    20. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2022. "Monopoly Capital in the time of digital platforms: a radical approach to the Amazon case," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1341-1367.
    21. Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, 2021. "Beyond the Stereotype: Restating the Relevance of the Dependency Research Programme," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 76-112, January.
    22. Matthieu Montalban & Vincent Frigant & Bernard Jullien, 2019. "Platform economy as a new form of capitalism: a Régulationist research programme," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(4), pages 805-824.
    23. Sai Lan & Kun Liu & Yidi Dong, 2019. "Dancing with wolves: how value creation and value capture dynamics affect complementor participation in industry platforms," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 943-963, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2021. "Monopoly Capitalism in the Digital Era," Working Papers in Public Economics 209, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    2. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.
    3. Andrew M. Fischer & Servaas Storm, 2023. "The Return of Debt Crisis in Developing Countries: Shifting or Maintaining Dominant Development Paradigms?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 954-993, September.
    4. Katarzyna Gruszka & Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle & Ernest Aigner, 2020. "Planetary carambolage: The evolutionary political economy of technology, nature and work," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 273-293, November.
    5. Wim Naudé, 2023. "Late industrialisation and global value chains under platform capitalism," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(1), pages 91-119, March.
    6. Rikap, Cecilia, 2022. "Becoming an intellectual monopoly by relying on the national innovation system: the State Grid Corporation of China's experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    7. Olk, Christopher, 2024. "How much a dollar cost: Currency hierarchy as a driver of ecologically unequal exchange," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Frédéric Marty & Thierry Warin, 2020. "Keystone Players and Complementors: An Innovation Perspective," Working Papers hal-03029748, HAL.
    9. Hong, Junjie & Shi, Fangyuan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2023. "Does network infrastructure construction reduce energy intensity? Based on the “Broadband China” strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Alexandre Chirat, 2022. "Consumer sovereignty in the digital society," EconomiX Working Papers 2022-25, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    11. Jürgen Essletzbichler & Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle & Lena Gerdes & Hans-Peter Wieland & Christian Dorninger, 2023. "Geographical evolutionary political economy: linking local evolution with uneven and combined development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 543-560.
    12. Matthew McCartney, 2017. "Bangladesh 2000-2017: Sustainable Growth, Technology and the Irrelevance of Productivity," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 22(Special E), pages 183-198, September.
    13. Tristan Auvray & Cédric Durand & Joel Rabinovich & Cecilia Rikap, 2021. "Corporate financialization’s conservation and transformation: from Mark I to Mark II," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 431-457, December.
    14. Tristan Auvray & Cédric Durand & Joel Rabinovich & Cecilia Rikap, 2020. "Financialization's conservation and transformation: from Mark I to Mark II," CEPN Working Papers hal-03079425, HAL.
    15. Joel Rabinovich, 2022. "The evolving contribution of R&D, advertising and capital expenditures for US-listed firms’ growth in sales, 1979-2018. A quantile regression analysis," Working Papers hal-03539656, HAL.
    16. Sandrine Michel, 2023. "Is the wage-labour nexus back? A regulationist investigation [Le retour du rapport salarial ? Une enquête régulationniste]," Post-Print hal-04255122, HAL.
    17. Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2023. "Weak sectors and weak ties? Labour dependence and asymmetric positioning in GVCs," LEM Papers Series 2023/10, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    18. Gruszka, Katarzyna & Pillinger, Anna & Gerold, Stefanie & Theine, Hendrik, 2022. "(De)valuation of household cleaning in the platform economy," Ecological Economic Papers 44/2022, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    19. Baines, Joseph & Hager, Sandy Brian, 2023. "Rentiership and Intellectual Monopoly in Contemporary Capitalism: Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Possibilities," EconStor Preprints 270981, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    20. Carolina Castaldi, 2023. "Off the mark? What we (should) know about the bright and dark sides of corporate trademark practices," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(5), pages 1046-1062.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:55:y:2024:i:3:p:429-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.