IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v51y2020i4p1160-1169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Against the Stream: Ajit Singh and His Battles

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, 2020. "Against the Stream: Ajit Singh and His Battles," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(4), pages 1160-1169, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:51:y:2020:i:4:p:1160-1169
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12607
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajit Singh, 2009. "Better to be rough and relevant than to be precise and irrelevant: Reddaway's legacy to economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(3), pages 363-379, May.
    2. Maria Cristina Marcuzzo & Nerio Naldi & Eleonora Sanfilippo & Annalisa Rosselli, 2008. "Cambridge as a Place in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 40(4), pages 569-593, Winter.
    3. Pasinetti,Luigi L., 2007. "Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashwani Saith, 2018. "Ajit Singh (1940–2015), the Radical Cambridge Economist: Anti†imperialist Advocate of Third World Industrialization," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 561-628, March.
    2. Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, 2012. "Working with archives: Cambridge economics through the magnifying glass," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, December.
    3. Tony Aspromourgos, 2019. "The Past and Future of Keynesian Economics: A Review Essay," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 59-78, January.
    4. Garbellini, Nadia, 2020. "Measurement without theory, and theory without measurement: What's wrong with Piketty's capital in the XXI century?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 50-62.
    5. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2011. "In Favor of Rigor and Relevance: A Reply to Mark Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 607-616, Fall.
    6. Pasinetti, Luigi L., 2022. "Structural dynamics versus a macroeconomic approach – A final statement?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 559-561.
    7. Ha-Joon Chang & Antonio Andreoni, 2021. "Bringing Production Back into Development: An introduction," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 165-178, April.
    8. Roy H. Grieve, 2012. "Keynes, Sraffa and the Emergence of the General Theory," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 51-67, January.
    9. Geoff C. Harcourt & Peter Kriesler, 2014. "On Ricardo and Cambridge," Discussion Papers 2014-04, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    10. Omar F. Hamouda, 2012. "The General Theory: Seventy-Five Years Later," Chapters, in: Thomas Cate (ed.), Keynes’s General Theory, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Kazuhiro Kurose, 2022. "A two-class economy from the multi-sectoral perspective: the controversy between Pasinetti and Meade–Hahn–Samuelson–Modigliani revisited," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 239-270, April.
    12. Pier Luigi Porta, 2013. "What remains of Sraffa's economics," Working Papers 242, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2013.
    13. Murray, Michael/ M J, 2011. "A critical perspective on heterodox production modeling," MPRA Paper 34255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Massimo Cingolani, 2015. "Sylos Labini su Marx: implicazioni per la politica economica (Sylos Labini on Marx: economic policy implications)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 68(269), pages 81-147.
    15. Bellino, Enrico, 2009. "The Classical approach to distribution and the “natural system”," MPRA Paper 14901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Dimitri Uzunidis & Blandine Laperche, 2011. "The New Mercantilism and the Crisis of the Global Knowledge Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(3), pages 373-392, September.
    17. Piero Bini, 2013. "The Italian Economists and the Crisis of the Nineteenseventies. The Rise and Fall of the "Conflict Paradigm"," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 73-101.
    18. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    19. Alessandro Le Donne, 2022. "Quale Marx? A partire da una rilettura di Marx e gli economisti classici di Pierangelo Garegnani (Which Marx? A discussion from a re-reading of Marx and the classical economists by Pierangelo Garegnan," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(299), pages 327-338.
    20. K. Vela Velupillai, 2011. "Postkeynesian Precepts for Nonlinear, Endogenous, Nonstochastic, Business Cycle Theories," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1107, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:51:y:2020:i:4:p:1160-1169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.