IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i2p1040-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The digitalization of sustainability reporting processes: A conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Pizzi
  • Giovanni Mastroleo
  • Andrea Venturelli
  • Fabio Caputo

Abstract

Building on the contingency theory, the paper aims to shed light on the contribution provided by technological innovation on sustainability reporting quality. A fuzzy expert system (FES) was developed to evaluate the cumulative effects related to the adoption of digital devices in sustainability reporting practices. The analysis underlined the enabling role covered by Sustainable Enterprise Resources Planning (S‐ERP) systems on sustainability reporting processes. In detail, we found that the disclosure of environmental information using technological platforms can lead analysts to a more accurate evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Pizzi & Giovanni Mastroleo & Andrea Venturelli & Fabio Caputo, 2024. "The digitalization of sustainability reporting processes: A conceptual framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1040-1050, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:1040-1050
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3544
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blerita Korca & Ericka Costa, 2021. "Directive 2014/95/EU: building a research agenda," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 401-422, January.
    2. Mohamed Ahmed Abobakr & Magdy Abdel-Kader & Ahmed Fouad Elbayoumi, 2022. "Integrating S-ERP systems and lean manufacturing practices to improve sustainability performance: an institutional theory perspective," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 870-897, October.
    3. Daniela Mancini & Rosa Lombardi & Madjid Tavana, 2021. "Four research pathways for understanding the role of smart technologies in accounting," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 1041-1062, August.
    4. Carlo Alberto Magni & Stefano Malagoli & Giovanni Mastroleo, 2006. "An Alternative Approach To Firms' Evaluation: Expert Systems And Fuzzy Logic," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(01), pages 195-225.
    5. Pei, Duo & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2020. "Big data and algorithmic trading against periodic and tangible asset reporting: The need for U-XBRL," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi & Silvia Romero, 2014. "Technology in audit engagements: a case study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 350-365, April.
    7. Simone Pizzi & Andrea Caputo & Andrea Venturelli & Fabio Caputo, 2022. "Embedding and managing blockchain in sustainability reporting: a practical framework," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 545-567, February.
    8. Susanne Leitner-Hanetseder & Othmar M. Lehner, 2022. "AI-powered information and Big Data: current regulations and ways forward in IFRS reporting," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 282-298, July.
    9. Rosa Lombardi & Giustina Secundo, 2020. "The digital transformation of corporate reporting – a systematic literature review and avenues for future research," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 1179-1208, September.
    10. Jana Schmitz & Giulia Leoni, 2019. "Accounting and Auditing at the Time of Blockchain Technology: A Research Agenda," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 331-342, June.
    11. Abdifatah Ahmed Haji & Paul Coram & Indrit Troshani, 2022. "Consequences of CSR reporting regulations worldwide: a review and research agenda," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 177-208, April.
    12. Jill Atkins & Federica Doni & Andrea Gasperini & Sonia Artuso & Ilaria Torre & Lorena Sorrentino, 2023. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Sustainability Measurement: Which ESG Metrics Will Survive COVID-19?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 629-646, July.
    13. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-05-2020-0085 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Otley, David T., 1980. "The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 413-428, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilii Erokhin & Dmitry Endovitsky & Alexey Bobryshev & Natalia Kulagina & Anna Ivolga, 2019. "Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Charpentier, Claes, 1998. "Budgetary Participation in a Public Service Organization," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    3. Francesca Francioli & Alberto Quagli, 2021. "Management accounting change and the rise of Vespa (1884-1965)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 313-338.
    4. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    5. Zand, Fardad & Van Beers, Cees & Van Leeuwen, George, 2011. "Information technology, organizational change and firm productivity: A panel study of complementarity effects and clustering patterns in Manufacturing and Services," MPRA Paper 46469, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Solabomi Omobola Ajibolade, Ph.D, FCA, FIMLS, ACTI, 2013. "Drivers of Choice of Management Accounting System Designs in Nigerian Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(9), pages 45-57, July.
    7. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2007. "Investment decisions, equivalent risk and bounded rationality," MPRA Paper 6073, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Cäker, Mikael & Siverbo, Sven, 2018. "Effects of performance measurement system inconsistency on managers’ role clarity and well-being," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-266.
    9. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    10. Jean-Yves Le Corre & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2022. "Managerial Control in an Online Constructivist Learning Environment: A Teacher’s Perspective," Post-Print hal-03806698, HAL.
    11. Widener, Sally K., 2004. "An empirical investigation of the relation between the use of strategic human capital and the design of the management control system," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 377-399.
    12. David Otley, 2007. "Beyond Performance Measurement," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(43), pages 26-32, November.
    13. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Ute Merbecks, 2024. "Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) in Germany: background and first empirical evidence from DAX 30 companies in 2020," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1025-1049, October.
    15. Giovanna Centorrino & Guido Noto & Daniela Rupo, 2022. "Management control in inter-firm relationships: Opportunities and challenges of blockchain technology adoption," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 65-88.
    16. Thi Cam Tu Luong & Ann Jorissen & Ine Paeleman, 2019. "Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-35, August.
    17. O'Connor, Neale G. & Luo, Yadong & Lee, Danny K. Y., 2001. "Self-selection, socialization and budget control in the PRC: a study of a U.S.-Sino joint venture and Chinese state-owned enterprise," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 135-148, May.
    18. Pascal Langevin & Thierry Picq, 2001. "Controle Des Equipes Virtuelles : Une Revue," Post-Print halshs-00584636, HAL.
    19. Vincent Chong & Kar Chong, 1997. "Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 268-276.
    20. Soufiane Kherrazi & Karim Saïd, 2022. "Managerial Practices Within Multilateral And Public-Funded R&D Collaborations," Post-Print hal-04205187, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:1040-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.