IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v44y2006i4p697-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fighting for Life: South African HIV/AIDS Peer Educators as a New Industrial Relations Actor?

Author

Listed:
  • David Dickinson

Abstract

This article examines HIV/AIDS peer educators in South African workplaces, drawing on research in five companies with large peer educator programmes. The research indicates that peer educators are primarily focused on reducing new HIV infections and ‘normalizing’ the epidemic by promoting change in the behaviour of individuals — a feature that is not accounted for by theories of workplace mobilization based on collective action. Similarly, their role is inadequately explained by theories on the emergence of new workplace actors based on the changing nature of work, shifting identity salience in society, and the nexus between workplace and communities as opportunities for union regeneration. After outlining the profile and activities of workplace HIV/AIDS peer educators, attention is paid to their motivations and methods of action, their relationship to management and unions, and the way in which they straddle workplace and community. The implications of this and the possible trajectory of workplace peer educators as a new industrial relations actor are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • David Dickinson, 2006. "Fighting for Life: South African HIV/AIDS Peer Educators as a New Industrial Relations Actor?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 697-717, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:697-717
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00520.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00520.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00520.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bacon & John Storey, 2000. "New Employee Relations Strategies in Britain: Towards Individualism or Partnership?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(3), pages 407-427, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Fry & Kelly Jarvis & Joanne Loundes, 2003. "Industrial Relations Reform at the Enterprise and Workplace," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2003n07, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    2. Zagelmeyer, Stefan, 2003. "Die Entwicklung kollektiver Verhandlungen in Großbritannien: ein historischer Überblick," Discussion Papers 17, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    3. Seppo Honkapohja & Frank Westermann, 2009. "Pay-setting Systems in Europe: Ongoing Developments and Possible Reforms," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Seppo Honkapohja & Frank Westermann (ed.), Designing the European Model, chapter 3, pages 82-121, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. William Brown & Paul Ryan, 2003. "The Irrelevance of Trade Union Recognition? A Comparison of Two Matched Companies," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 6(3), pages 383-408, September.
    5. Nicolas Bacon & Paul Blyton, 2004. "Trade union responses to workplace restructuring: exploring union orientations and actions," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(4), pages 749-773, December.
    6. Muhamamd Zia-ur Rehman & Riasat Ali Khan & Noor Hassan, 2016. "Investigating the Role of Beliefs and Professional Values in HR Management," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 150-166, June.
    7. Catherine Cassell & Bill Lee, 2009. "Trade unions learning representatives: progressing partnership?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 213-230, June.
    8. Francesconi, Marco & L. Booth, Alison, 2000. "Collectivism versus individualism: performance-related pay and union coverage for non-standard workers in Britain," ISER Working Paper Series 2000-35, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Peter Samuel & Nicolas Bacon, 2010. "The contents of partnership agreements in Britain 1990-2007," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 24(3), pages 430-448, September.
    10. David Dawson, 2015. "Two Forms of Virtue Ethics: Two Sets of Virtuous Action in the Fire Service Dispute?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 585-601, May.
    11. Nicolas Bacon & Peter Samuel, 2009. "Partnership agreement adoption and survival in the British private and public sectors," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 231-248, June.
    12. Sang-Woo Lee, 2010. "A Comparison of the British and the German Industrial Relations and its Implications," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 167-182, March.
    13. Peter Butler & Linda Glover & Olga Tregaskis, 2011. "‘When the Going Gets Tough’ . . . : Recession and the Resilience of Workplace Partnership," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 666-687, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:697-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.