IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v42y2004i1p47-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Collective Bargaining on Flag of Convenience Shipping

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Lillie

Abstract

The most significant case of transnational union bargaining co‐ordination in existence is in the maritime shipping industry. A global union association, the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), and a global employers’ federation, the International Maritime Employers’ Committee (IMEC), now negotiate over pay scales for seafarers on Flag of Convenience (FOC) ships. These negotiations set the pattern for pay and working conditions for a signifi‐cant portion of the global seafaring work‐force. The ITF brought about global wage bargaining by building and enforcing a global inter‐union consensus between developed and developing countries around a uniform wage rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Lillie, 2004. "Global Collective Bargaining on Flag of Convenience Shipping," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 42(1), pages 47-67, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:47-67
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00304.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00304.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00304.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Syamantak Bhattacharya & Lijun Tang, 2013. "Fatigued for safety? Supply chain occupational health and safety initiatives in shipping," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 383-399, August.
    2. Tsamourgelis, Ioannis, 2007. "Chapter 5 Employment Practices and Greek Shipping Competitiveness," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 121-170, January.
    3. Tony Royle & Luis Ortiz, 2009. "Dominance Effects from Local Competitors: Setting Institutional Parameters for Employment Relations in Multinational Subsidiaries; a Case from the Spanish Supermarket Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 653-675, December.
    4. William C. Terry, 2009. "Working on the Water: On Legal Space and Seafarer Protection in the Cruise Industry," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(4), pages 463-482, October.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:382526 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Nikolaus Hammer, 2006. "Gewerkschaftsstrategien auf globaler Ebene. Zur Entstehung eines breiten Repertoires," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 32(1), pages 95-120.
    7. Lauren R. Shapiro & Marie-Helen Maras & Lucia Velotti & Susan Pickman & Hung-Lung Wei & Robert Till, 2018. "Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 65-83, December.
    8. Bourque, Reynald., 2005. "Les accords-cadres internationaux (ACI) et la négociation collective internationale à l'ère de la mondialisation : document de travail," ILO Working Papers 993825263402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Heiner Dribbusch, 2015. "Where is the European general strike? Understanding the challenges of trans-European trade union action against austerity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 171-185, May.
    10. Yin, Jingbo & Fan, Lixian & Li, Kevin X., 2018. "Second ship registry in flag choice mechanism: The implications for China in promoting a maritime cluster policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 152-165.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:47-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.