IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v78y2022i2p668-678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regression‐based negative control of homophily in dyadic peer effect analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lan Liu
  • Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen

Abstract

A prominent threat to causal inference about peer effects in social science studies is the presence of homophily bias , that is, social influence between friends and families is entangled with common characteristics or underlying similarities that form close connections. Analysis of social study data has suggested that certain health conditions such as obesity and psychological states including happiness and loneliness can spread between friends and relatives. However, such analyses of peer effects or contagion effects have come under criticism because homophily bias may compromise the causal statement. We develop a regression‐based approach which leverages a negative control exposure for identification and estimation of contagion effects on additive or multiplicative scales, in the presence of homophily bias. We apply our methods to evaluate the peer effect of obesity in Framingham Offspring Study.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan Liu & Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2022. "Regression‐based negative control of homophily in dyadic peer effect analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 668-678, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:2:p:668-678
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Liu & M. G. Hudgens & S. Becker-Dreps, 2016. "On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 829-842.
    2. Braz Camargo & Ralph Stinebrickner & Todd Stinebrickner, 2010. "Interracial Friendships in College," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(4), pages 861-892, October.
    3. Bramoullé, Yann & Djebbari, Habiba & Fortin, Bernard, 2009. "Identification of peer effects through social networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 41-55, May.
    4. Sobel, Michael E., 2006. "What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate?: Causal Inference in the Face of Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1398-1407, December.
    5. A. James O'Malley & Felix Elwert & J. Niels Rosenquist & Alan M. Zaslavsky & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2014. "Estimating peer effects in longitudinal dyadic data using instrumental variables," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 506-515, September.
    6. Lan Liu & Michael G. Hudgens, 2014. "Large Sample Randomization Inference of Causal Effects in the Presence of Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 288-301, March.
    7. Hudgens, Michael G. & Halloran, M. Elizabeth, 2008. "Toward Causal Inference With Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 832-842, June.
    8. Fowler, J.H. & Christakis, N.A., 2008. "Estimating peer effects on health in social networks: A response to Cohen-Cole and Fletcher; and Trogdon, Nonnemaker, and Pais," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1400-1405, September.
    9. Wang Miao & Zhi Geng & Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2018. "Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(4), pages 987-993.
    10. Felix Elwert & Nicholas Christakis, 2008. "Wives and ex-wives: A new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(4), pages 851-873, November.
    11. Giacomo De Giorgi & Michele Pellizzari & Silvia Redaelli, 2010. "Identification of Social Interactions through Partially Overlapping Peer Groups," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 241-275, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare, 2017. "Identification and Estimation of Spillover Effects in Randomized Experiments," Papers 1711.02745, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Tiziano Arduini & Eleonora Patacchini & Edoardo Rainone, 2020. "Treatment Effects With Heterogeneous Externalities," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 826-838, October.
    3. Yi Zhang & Kosuke Imai, 2023. "Individualized Policy Evaluation and Learning under Clustered Network Interference," Papers 2311.02467, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    4. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," Working Papers hal-03455978, HAL.
    5. Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare, 2020. "Causal Spillover Effects Using Instrumental Variables," Papers 2003.06023, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.
    6. Michael P. Leung, 2020. "Treatment and Spillover Effects Under Network Interference," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(2), pages 368-380, May.
    7. Zhaonan Qu & Ruoxuan Xiong & Jizhou Liu & Guido Imbens, 2021. "Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies with Heterogeneous Partial Interference," Papers 2107.12420, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    8. Vazquez-Bare, Gonzalo, 2023. "Identification and estimation of spillover effects in randomized experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    9. Yann Bramoullé & Habiba Djebbari & Bernard Fortin, 2020. "Peer Effects in Networks: A Survey," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 603-629, August.
    10. Brian J. Reich & Shu Yang & Yawen Guan & Andrew B. Giffin & Matthew J. Miller & Ana Rappold, 2021. "A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 605-634, December.
    11. Sujatro Chakladar & Samuel Rosin & Michael G. Hudgens & M. Elizabeth Halloran & John D. Clemens & Mohammad Ali & Michael E. Emch, 2022. "Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 777-788, June.
    12. Han, Kevin & Basse, Guillaume & Bojinov, Iavor, 2024. "Population interference in panel experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    13. A. Giffin & B. J. Reich & S. Yang & A. G. Rappold, 2023. "Generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2220-2231, September.
    14. Clarke, Damian, 2017. "Estimating Difference-in-Differences in the Presence of Spillovers," MPRA Paper 81604, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Jochmans, Koen, 2023. "Peer effects and endogenous social interactions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1203-1214.
    16. Tadao Hoshino & Takahide Yanagi, 2021. "Causal Inference with Noncompliance and Unknown Interference," Papers 2108.07455, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    17. Gail E. Potter & Nicole Bohme Carnegie & Jonathan D. Sugimoto & Aldiouma Diallo & John C. Victor & Kathleen M. Neuzil & M. Elizabeth Halloran, 2022. "Using social contact data to improve the overall effect estimate of a cluster‐randomized influenza vaccination program in Senegal," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 70-90, January.
    18. Zhichao Jiang & Kosuke Imai & Anup Malani, 2023. "Statistical inference and power analysis for direct and spillover effects in two‐stage randomized experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2370-2381, September.
    19. Matthew A. Lenard & Mikko Silliman, 2024. "Informal Social Interactions, Academic Achievement and Behaviour: Evidence from Peers on the School Bus," CESifo Working Paper Series 11115, CESifo.
    20. Alan Andre Borges da Costa & Sergio Pinheiro Firpo, 2018. "An analysis of the distributive effects of public policies and their spillovers," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2018_06, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:2:p:668-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.