IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v77y2021i3p970-983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of conditional power for cluster‐randomized trials with interval‐censored endpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Kaitlyn Cook
  • Rui Wang

Abstract

Cluster‐randomized trials (CRTs) of infectious disease preventions often yield correlated, interval‐censored data: dependencies may exist between observations from the same cluster, and event occurrence may be assessed only at intermittent study visits. This data structure must be accounted for when conducting interim monitoring and futility assessment for CRTs. In this article, we propose a flexible framework for conditional power estimation when outcomes are correlated and interval‐censored. Under the assumption that the survival times follow a shared frailty model, we first characterize the correspondence between the marginal and cluster‐conditional survival functions, and then use this relationship to semiparametrically estimate the cluster‐specific survival distributions from the available interim data. We incorporate assumptions about changes to the event process over the remainder of the trial—as well as estimates of the dependency among observations in the same cluster—to extend these survival curves through the end of the study. Based on these projected survival functions, we generate correlated interval‐censored observations, and then calculate the conditional power as the proportion of times (across multiple full‐data generation steps) that the null hypothesis of no treatment effect is rejected. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through extensive simulation studies, and illustrate its use on a large cluster‐randomized HIV prevention trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaitlyn Cook & Rui Wang, 2021. "Estimation of conditional power for cluster‐randomized trials with interval‐censored endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 970-983, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:970-983
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard E. Chandler & Steven Bate, 2007. "Inference for clustered data using the independence loglikelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 167-183.
    2. Samuli Ripatti & Juni Palmgren, 2000. "Estimation of Multivariate Frailty Models Using Penalized Partial Likelihood," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1016-1022, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Il Do Ha & Maengseok Noh & Youngjo Lee, 2010. "Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 307-320, June.
    2. Costa, Rui J. & Wilkinson-Herbots, Hilde M., 2021. "Inference of gene flow in the process of speciation: Efficient maximum-likelihood implementation of a generalised isolation-with-migration model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Guillaume Horny & Dragana Djurdjevic & Bernhard Boockmann & François Laisney, 2008. "Bayesian Estimation of Cox Models with Non-nested Random Effects: an Application to the Ratification Of ILO Conventions by Developing Countries," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 89, pages 193-214.
    4. Goele Massonnet & Paul Janssen & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2008. "Fitting Conditional Survival Models to Meta‐Analytic Data by Using a Transformation Toward Mixed‐Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 834-842, September.
    5. Jing Wang, 2019. "Weighted estimation for multivariate shared frailty models for complex surveys," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 469-479, July.
    6. Meisam Moghimbeygi & Mousa Golalizadeh, 2019. "A longitudinal model for shapes through triangulation," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(1), pages 99-121, March.
    7. Wenjing Qi & Andrew S Allen & Yi-Ju Li, 2019. "Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Hung‐pin Lai & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2020. "Estimation of a dynamic stochastic frontier model using likelihood‐based approaches," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 217-247, March.
    9. Djeundje, Viani Biatat & Crook, Jonathan, 2018. "Incorporating heterogeneity and macroeconomic variables into multi-state delinquency models for credit cards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 697-709.
    10. Mevin Hooten & Christopher Wikle & Michael Schwob, 2020. "Statistical Implementations of Agent‐Based Demographic Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 441-461, August.
    11. Gourieroux, C. & Monfort, A., 2018. "Composite indirect inference with application to corporate risks," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 30-45.
    12. Duha Hamed & Ahmad Alzaghal, 2021. "New class of Lindley distributions: properties and applications," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Richard Tawiah & Geoffrey J. McLachlan & Shu Kay Ng, 2020. "A bivariate joint frailty model with mixture framework for survival analysis of recurrent events with dependent censoring and cure fraction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 753-766, September.
    15. F. Giummolè & V. Mameli & E. Ruli & L. Ventura, 2019. "Objective Bayesian inference with proper scoring rules," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 728-755, September.
    16. Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Laura Šaltytė, 2011. "Spatial--temporal model for wind speed in Lithuania," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 1151-1168, April.
    17. Tata Subba Rao & Granville Tunnicliffe Wilson & Joao Jesus & Richard E. Chandler, 2017. "Inference with the Whittle Likelihood: A Tractable Approach Using Estimating Functions," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 204-224, March.
    18. Rafael Pimentel Maia & Per Madsen & Rodrigo Labouriau, 2014. "Multivariate survival mixed models for genetic analysis of longevity traits," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 1286-1306, June.
    19. Derek Dinart & Carine Bellera & Virginie Rondeau, 2022. "Sample size estimation for cancer randomized trials in the presence of heterogeneous populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1662-1673, December.
    20. Lore Zumeta-Olaskoaga & Maximilian Weigert & Jon Larruskain & Eder Bikandi & Igor Setuain & Josean Lekue & Helmut Küchenhoff & Dae-Jin Lee, 2023. "Prediction of sports injuries in football: a recurrent time-to-event approach using regularized Cox models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(1), pages 101-126, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:970-983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.