IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i2p566-574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regularity of a renewal process estimated from binary data

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Rice
  • Robert L. Strawderman
  • Brent A. Johnson

Abstract

Assessment of the regularity of a sequence of events over time is important for clinical decision†making as well as informing public health policy. Our motivating example involves determining the effect of an intervention on the regularity of HIV self†testing behavior among high†risk individuals when exact self†testing times are not recorded. Assuming that these unobserved testing times follow a renewal process, the goals of this work are to develop suitable methods for estimating its distributional parameters when only the presence or absence of at least one event per subject in each of several observation windows is recorded. We propose two approaches to estimation and inference: a likelihood†based discrete survival model using only time to first event; and a potentially more efficient quasi†likelihood approach based on the forward recurrence time distribution using all available data. Regularity is quantified and estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV) of the interevent time distribution. Focusing on the gamma renewal process, where the shape parameter of the corresponding interevent time distribution has a monotone relationship with its CV, we conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. We then apply them to our motivating example, concluding that the use of text message reminders significantly improves the regularity of self†testing, but not its frequency. A discussion on interesting directions for further research is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Rice & Robert L. Strawderman & Brent A. Johnson, 2018. "Regularity of a renewal process estimated from binary data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 566-574, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:566-574
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12768
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiguang Song & John M. Karon & Edward White & Gary Goldbaum, 2006. "Estimating the Distribution of a Renewal Process from Times at which Events from an Independent Process Are Detected," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 838-846, September.
    2. Winkelmann, Rainer, 1995. "Duration Dependence and Dispersion in Count-Data Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(4), pages 467-474, October.
    3. Ying Zhang & Mortaza Jamshidian, 2003. "The Gamma-Frailty Poisson Model for the Nonparametric Estimation of Panel Count Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1099-1106, December.
    4. R. Dunn & S. Reader & N. Wrigley, 1983. "An Investigation of the Assumptions of the Nbd Model as Applied to Purchasing at Individual Stores," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 32(3), pages 249-259, November.
    5. Yao, Bin & Wang, Lianming & He, Xin, 2016. "Semiparametric regression analysis of panel count data allowing for within-subject correlation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 47-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugenio J. Miravete, 2004. "The Doubtful Profitability of Foggy Pricing," Working Papers 04-07, NET Institute.
    2. Gurmu, Shiferaw & Rilstone, Paul & Stern, Steven, 1998. "Semiparametric estimation of count regression models1," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 123-150, November.
    3. Rainer Winkelmann & Klaus Zimmermann, 1998. "Is job stability declining in Germany? Evidence from count data models," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(11), pages 1413-1420.
    4. Azizpour, S & Giesecke, K. & Schwenkler, G., 2018. "Exploring the sources of default clustering," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 154-183.
    5. Stefano Mainardi, 2003. "Testing convergence in life expectancies: count regression models on panel data," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(4), pages 350-370.
    6. Anesbury, Zachary William & Talbot, Danielle & Day, Chanel Andrea & Bogomolov, Tim & Bogomolova, Svetlana, 2020. "The fallacy of the heavy buyer: Exploring purchasing frequencies of fresh fruit and vegetable categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    7. Eugenio J. Miravete, 2009. "Competing with Menus of Tariff Options," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(1), pages 188-205, March.
    8. Govert Bijwaard, 2010. "Regularity in individual shopping trips: implications for duration models in marketing," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11), pages 1931-1945.
    9. Gang Cheng & Ying Zhang & Liqiang Lu, 2011. "Efficient algorithms for computing the non and semi-parametric maximum likelihood estimates with panel count data," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 567-579.
    10. Reutterer, Thomas & Platzer, Michael & Schröder, Nadine, 2021. "Leveraging purchase regularity for predicting customer behavior the easy way," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 194-215.
    11. Alison L. Booth & Hiau Joo Kee, 2009. "Intergenerational Transmission of Fertility Patterns," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(2), pages 183-208, April.
    12. Torsten Bornemann & Cornelia Hattula & Stefan Hattula, 2020. "Successive product generations: financial implications of industry release rhythm alignment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1174-1191, November.
    13. Jeongwen Chiang & Ching-Fan Chung & Emily Cremers, 2001. "Promotions and the pattern of grocery shopping time," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 801-819.
    14. Haab, T. C., 2003. "Temporal correlation in recreation demand models with limited data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 195-212, March.
    15. Rainer Winkelmann, 2015. "Counting on count data models," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 148-148, May.
    16. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.
    17. Jing Ning & Jing Qin & Yu Shen, 2010. "Non‐parametric tests for right‐censored data with biased sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(5), pages 609-630, November.
    18. Ho, Chinh Q., 2022. "Can MaaS change users’ travel behaviour to deliver commercial and societal outcomes?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 76-97.
    19. Michael Platzer & Thomas Reutterer, 2016. "Ticking Away the Moments: Timing Regularity Helps to Better Predict Customer Activity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 779-799, September.
    20. Antonio Ladrón de Guevara, 2001. "A dynamic choice model of hybrid behavior in the attribute-space," Economics Working Papers 589, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:566-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.