IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v61y2005i4p1076-1084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Shared Response Model for Clustered Binary Data in Developmental Toxicity Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Pang
  • Anthony Y. C. Kuk

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Pang & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2005. "A Shared Response Model for Clustered Binary Data in Developmental Toxicity Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1076-1084, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:4:p:1076-1084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00375.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia M. E. Altham, 1978. "Two Generalizations of the Binomial Distribution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 27(2), pages 162-167, June.
    2. Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2004. "A litter‐based approach to risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies via a power family of completely monotone functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 53(2), pages 369-386, April.
    3. Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2003. "A generalized estimating equation approach to modelling foetal response in developmental toxicity studies when the number of implants is dose dependent," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(1), pages 51-61, January.
    4. Francesca Dominici & Giovanni Parmigiani, 2001. "Bayesian Semiparametric Analysis of Developmental Toxicology Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 150-157, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Pang & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2007. "Test of Marginal Compatibility and Smoothing Methods for Exchangeable Binary Data with Unequal Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 218-227, March.
    2. Yu, Chang & Zelterman, Daniel, 2008. "Sums of exchangeable Bernoulli random variables for family and litter frequency data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1636-1649, January.
    3. Brown, B.M., 2009. "The logit-stable distributions and latent utility scales in categorical data applications," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(20), pages 2182-2188, October.
    4. Kolossiatis, M. & Griffin, J.E. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Modeling overdispersion with the normalized tempered stable distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2288-2301, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Chang & Zelterman, Daniel, 2008. "Sums of exchangeable Bernoulli random variables for family and litter frequency data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1636-1649, January.
    2. Zhen Pang & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2007. "Test of Marginal Compatibility and Smoothing Methods for Exchangeable Binary Data with Unequal Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 218-227, March.
    3. Kolossiatis, M. & Griffin, J.E. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Modeling overdispersion with the normalized tempered stable distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2288-2301, July.
    4. Pires, Rubiane M. & Diniz, Carlos A.R., 2012. "Correlated binomial regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2513-2525.
    5. Molenberghs, Geert & Declerck, Lieven & Aerts, Marc, 1998. "Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 327-349, January.
    6. Borges, Patrick & Rodrigues, Josemar & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Bazán, Jorge, 2014. "A COM–Poisson type generalization of the binomial distribution and its properties and applications," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 158-166.
    7. Iain L. MacDonald, 2021. "Is EM really necessary here? Examples where it seems simpler not to use EM," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(4), pages 629-647, December.
    8. Sueli Mingoti, 2003. "A note on the sample size required in sequential tests for the generalized binomial distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 873-879.
    9. Kassandra Fronczyk & Athanasios Kottas, 2017. "Risk Assessment for Toxicity Experiments with Discrete and Continuous Outcomes: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 585-601, December.
    10. Ardo Hout & Graciela Muniz-Terrera, 2019. "Hidden three-state survival model for bivariate longitudinal count data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 529-545, July.
    11. Dale Bowman & E. Olusegun George, 2017. "Weighted least squares estimation for exchangeable binary data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1747-1765, December.
    12. Dette, Holger & Biedermann, Stefanie & Zhu, Wei, 2005. "Geometric construction of optimal designs for dose-responsemodels with two parameters," Technical Reports 2005,08, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    13. Maria A. Spassova, 2019. "Statistical Approach to Identify Threshold and Point of Departure in Dose–Response Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 940-956, April.
    14. Dette, Holger & Biedermann, Stefanie & Zhu, Wei, 2004. "Optimal designs for dose-response models with restricted design spaces," Technical Reports 2004,40, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    15. Dittrich, R. & Hatzinger, R. & Katzenbeisser, W., 2002. "Modelling dependencies in paired comparison data: A log-linear approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 39-57, July.
    16. María Carmen Pardo & Rosa Alonso, 2019. "Working correlation structure selection in GEE analysis," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1447-1467, October.
    17. Dankmar Böhning, 2015. "Power series mixtures and the ratio plot with applications to zero-truncated count distribution modelling," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 201-216, August.
    18. Hui-Xiu Zhao & Jin-Guan Lin, 2013. "An approximately optimal non-parametric procedure for analyzing exchangeable binary data with random cluster sizes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 2029-2047, October.
    19. Catalina Stefanescu & Bruce W. Turnbull, 2003. "Likelihood Inference for Exchangeable Binary Data with Varying Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 18-24, March.
    20. Lovison, G., 1998. "An alternative representation of Altham's multiplicative-binomial distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 415-420, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:4:p:1076-1084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.