IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v7y1997i13p31-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Reporting of Cultural, Heritage, Scientific and Community Collections

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Micallef
  • Graham Peirson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Micallef & Graham Peirson, 1997. "Financial Reporting of Cultural, Heritage, Scientific and Community Collections," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(13), pages 31-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:7:y:1997:i:13:p:31-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1997.tb00025.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.D. Carnegie & P.W. Wolnizer, 1995. "The Financial Value Of Cultural, Heritage And Scientific Collections: An Accounting Fiction," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 5(9), pages 31-47, June.
    2. Roger L. Burritt & Michael McCrae & Chandra Benjamin, 1996. "What Is A Public-Sector Asset?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(11), pages 23-28, March.
    3. Frey, Bruno S, 1994. "Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 41(3), pages 325-335, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.
    2. Filip Hrůza & Petr Valouch, 2016. "Public Sector Accounting Policy Reform in the Czech Republic: Experience from Local Governments (pilot)," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(4), pages 17-37.
    3. Guido Modugno & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Manuela Lucchese & Tommaso Agasisti, 2021. "Grafting New Values into Public Institutions by Reforming the Accounting System: Lessons Learned from the Italian Higher Education System," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Chew Ng & Bob Shead, 1999. "Major Issues Associated With the Reporting of Government Net Worth," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 61-68, November.
    5. Apostol, Oana & Mäkelä, Hannele & Vinnari, Eija, 2023. "Cultural sustainability and the construction of (in)commensurability: cultural heritage at the Roşia Montană mining site," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Ram Karan, 2003. "Selective Commercialisation of Public-Sector Accounting and its Consequences for Public Accountability," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 15-25, November.
    7. Ellwood, Sheila & Greenwood, Margaret, 2016. "Accounting for heritage assets: Does measuring economic value ‘kill the cat’?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Garry Carnegie & Peter Wolnizer, 1999. "Unravelling the Rhetoric About the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 16-21, March.
    9. Paolo Ferri & Simone Napolitano & Luca Zan, 2023. "The income gap reporting framework in public not-for-profit organizations: the British Museum case," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1303-1338, December.
    10. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    11. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    2. Garry Carnegie & Peter Wolnizer, 1999. "Unravelling the Rhetoric About the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 16-21, March.
    3. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    4. Garry Carnegie & Brian West, 1997. "Observing the PSASB: ED 50 and the Recognition of Infrastructure Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(14), pages 30-39, October.
    5. Ram Karan, 2003. "Selective Commercialisation of Public-Sector Accounting and its Consequences for Public Accountability," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 15-25, November.
    6. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.
    7. Peter Johnson & Barry Thomas, 1998. "The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 75-85, June.
    8. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.
    9. Filip Hrůza & Petr Valouch, 2016. "Public Sector Accounting Policy Reform in the Czech Republic: Experience from Local Governments (pilot)," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(4), pages 17-37.
    10. Vincent G. Munley, 2018. "A Contingent Valuation Analysis of the Galway City Museum: Welfare Estimates for Attendance in the Absence of an Admission Fee," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 49(4), pages 489-514.
    11. John Ashworth & Peter Johnson, 1996. "Sources of “value for money” for museum visitors: Some survey evidence," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(1), pages 67-83, March.
    12. Murat Arik & Hulya Varol & Stan McMillen, 2000. "The Economic Impact of the New Britain Museum of American Art Expansion," CCEA Studies 2000-05, University of Connecticut, Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis.
    13. J. Guthrie & L. Parker & L. M. English, 2003. "A Review of New Public Financial Management Change in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 3-9, July.
    14. Natalia Aversano & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and universities: New evidence from the Italian scenario," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1892-1899, July.
    15. Chew Ng & Bob Shead, 1999. "Major Issues Associated With the Reporting of Government Net Worth," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 61-68, November.
    16. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Museums between Private and Public - The Case of the Beyeler Museum in Basle," IEW - Working Papers 116, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    17. Juan Prieto-Rodríguez & Víctor Fernández-Blanco, 2006. "Optimal pricing and grant policies for museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(3), pages 169-181, December.
    18. Roger L. Burritt & Michael McCrae & Chandra Benjamin, 1996. "What Is A Public-Sector Asset?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(11), pages 23-28, March.
    19. Silvia Fedeli & Michele Santoni, 2006. "The Government's Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(1), pages 41-72, March.
    20. Frey, Bruno S. & Eichenberger, Reiner, 1995. "On the rate of return in the art market: Survey and evaluation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 528-537, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:7:y:1997:i:13:p:31-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.