IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v34y2024i2p178-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Readability Improve Investors’ Understanding of Hedging Positions?

Author

Listed:
  • Wenhuan Liu
  • Yue Yan
  • Bin Li
  • Chaosha Yang

Abstract

Readability is a key issue in the presentation of hedging risk information. We use psychological theories and experiments to analyse and examine the effects of the readability of hedging risk and hedge effectiveness information on investors’ assessment of investments. We find that when hedging risk information presentation is more readable, investors’ judgement of the attractiveness of an investment is higher when hedging effectiveness is high than when hedging effectiveness is low. However, when hedging risk presentation information is less readable, there is no significant difference in their judgement of the attractiveness of an investment between two hedging effectiveness levels. Meanwhile, we further identify the mediation effects of the readability of hedging risk information on investors’ judgement of an investment's attractiveness. The findings of our study have significant implications for improving accounting information readability and enhancing accounting information quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenhuan Liu & Yue Yan & Bin Li & Chaosha Yang, 2024. "Does Readability Improve Investors’ Understanding of Hedging Positions?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(2), pages 178-186, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:178-186
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:178-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.