IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v13y2003i29p8-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IASB Standards for Australia by 2005: Catapult or Trojan Horse?

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Haswell
  • Jill Mckinnon

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Haswell & Jill Mckinnon, 2003. "IASB Standards for Australia by 2005: Catapult or Trojan Horse?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 8-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:29:p:8-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00215.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, Pd & Eddey, Ph & Harris, Ts, 1993. "An Investigation Of Revaluations Of Tangible Long-Lived Assets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31, pages 1-38.
    2. Lawrence White, 2002. "Globalized Securities Markets and Accounting: How Many Standards?," Working Papers 02-11, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irvine, Helen, 2008. "The global institutionalization of financial reporting: The case of the United Arab Emirates," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 125-142.
    2. Josef Jílek, 2016. "‘Fair Value’ of Core Deposits in the EU version of IFRS: A Critical Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(3), pages 312-325, September.
    3. Jayne M Godfrey & Ian A Langfield-Smith, 2005. "Regulatory Capture in the Globalisation of Accounting Standards," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(11), pages 1975-1993, November.
    4. Andrew, Jane & Cortese, Corinne, 2013. "Free market environmentalism and the neoliberal project: The case of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 397-409.
    5. Parmod Chand & Lorne Cummings, 2008. "The Political and Unstable Nature of the IASB's ‘Stable Platform’: Post-Convergence Australian Experience," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 175-184, September.
    6. Stephen Haswell & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2008. "Fifty-Seven Serious Defects in ‘Australian’ IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 46-62, March.
    7. Stephen Haswell, 2006. "Over-Complexity in Accounting Standards and the Emerging Duopoly of US GAAP AND IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 49-59, July.
    8. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M Godfrey, 2011. "Changes in value relevance of accounting information upon IFRS adoption: Evidence from Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(2), pages 151-173, August.
    9. Bryan Howieson & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2003. "The FRC AND Accounting Standard-Setting: Should I Still Call Australia Home?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 17-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Young Jun & Choi, Sera & Lee, Eugenia Y. & Lee, Su Jeong, 2023. "Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    2. King, Raymond D. & Langli, John Christian, 1998. "Accounting diversity and firm valuation," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 529-567.
    3. Ann Gaeremynck & Reinhilde Veugelers, 1999. "The revaluation of assets as a signalling device: a theoretical and an empirical analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 123-138.
    4. Julie Cotter & Tracy Martin & Donald Stokes, 1995. "Reaction To The Mandatory Write-Down Provisions Of AASB 1010: Accounting For The Revaluation Of Non-Current Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 5(10), pages 64-70, November.
    5. Jason Cummins & Trevor Harris & Kevin Hassett, 1995. "Accounting Standards, Information Flow, and Firm Investment Behavior," NBER Chapters, in: The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, pages 181-224, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Godwin, Joseph H. & Goldberg, Stephen R. & Douthett, Edward B., 1998. "Relevance of U.S.-GAAP for Japanese companies," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 589-604.
    7. Gonzalo Rodríguez‐Pérez & John Slof & Magda Solà & Margarita Torrent & Immaculada Vilardell, 2011. "Assessing the Impact of Fair‐Value Accounting on Financial Statement Analysis: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 47(1), pages 61-84, March.
    8. Tony Abrahams & Baljit K. Sidhu, 1998. "The Role of R&D Capitalisations in Firm Valuation and Perfor Mance Measurement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 23(2), pages 169-183, December.
    9. Nik Azmiah Binti Nik Azin & Norhayati bt Alias, 2019. "Value Relevance of Intangible Assets Before and After FRS 138 Adoptions: Evidence From Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 267-279, May.
    10. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    11. Hanlon, Dean & Navissi, Farshid & Soepriyanto, Gatot, 2014. "The value relevance of deferred tax attributed to asset revaluations," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 87-99.
    12. Courtenay, Stephen M. & Cahan, Steven F., 2004. "The impact of debt on market reactions to the revaluation of noncurrent assets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 219-243, April.
    13. Olante, Maria Elena & Lassini, Ugo, 2022. "Investment property: Fair value or cost model? Recent evidence from the application of IAS 40 in Europe," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Rosalyn Oei & Alan Ramsay & Paul Mather, 2008. "Earnings persistence, accruals and managerial share ownership," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 475-502, September.
    15. Hasnah Shaari & Tongyu Cao & Ray Donnelly, 2017. "Reversals of impairment charges under IAS 36: evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3), pages 224-240, August.
    16. Michael D. Stuart & Richard H. Willis, 2020. "Use of independent valuation specialists in valuing employee stock options: evidence from IPOs," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 438-473, June.
    17. Lopes, Alexsandro Broedel & Walker, Martin, 2012. "Asset revaluations, future firm performance and firm-level corporate governance arrangements: New evidence from Brazil," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 53-67.
    18. Adrienna Huffman, 2018. "Asset use and the relevance of fair value measurement: evidence from IAS 41," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1274-1314, December.
    19. Konstantinos J. Liapis & Christos L.Galanos, 2010. "Accounting GAAPs and Accounting Treatments for Management of Property: Case Studies from Greek Real Estate Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 169-194.
    20. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 2001. "The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 77-104, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:29:p:8-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.