IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jocaae/v19y2023i1s1815566922000352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Young Jun
  • Choi, Sera
  • Lee, Eugenia Y.
  • Lee, Su Jeong

Abstract

Perpetual securities are classified as equity under the International Financial Reporting Standards, but various contract terms embedded in the securities create additional debt- and equity-like characteristics. This study examines whether stock market investors differentiate between diverse contract attributes. Using quarterly data on listed non-financial firms in the Korea Exchange that issued perpetual securities during 2012–2020, we document the following findings. First, perpetual securities are positively associated with stock prices. Second, the positive association is driven by perpetual securities convertible to stocks rather than non-convertible ones. Third, when further decomposing convertible perpetual securities based on whether the conversion price is fixed or floating, only fixed-priced convertibles show a positive association with stock prices. Overall, our findings suggest that equity investors consider the detailed contract attributes important for financial instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Young Jun & Choi, Sera & Lee, Eugenia Y. & Lee, Su Jeong, 2023. "Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:19:y:2023:i:1:s1815566922000352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566922000352
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Schmidt, 2013. "Equity and Liabilities -- A Discussion of IAS 32 and a Critique of the Classification," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 201-222, November.
    2. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch, 2009. "Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3-4), pages 253-288.
    3. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 2001. "The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 77-104, September.
    4. Neil Fargher & Baljit K. Sidhu & Ann Tarca & Warrick van Zyl, 2019. "Accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of debt and equity: finding a way forward," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 7-58, March.
    5. Kim, Woochan & Kim, Woojin & Kim, Hyungseok, 2013. "Death spiral issues in emerging market: A control related perspective," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 14-36.
    6. William Terando & Wayne Shaw & David Smith, 2007. "Valuation and classification of company issued cash and share-puts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 223-240, October.
    7. Shana Clor‐Proell & Lisa Koonce & Brian White, 2016. "How Do Experienced Users Evaluate Hybrid Financial Instruments?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1267-1296, December.
    8. Easton, Pd & Eddey, Ph & Harris, Ts, 1993. "An Investigation Of Revaluations Of Tangible Long-Lived Assets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31, pages 1-38.
    9. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch, 2009. "Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3‐4), pages 253-288, April.
    10. Hopkins, PE, 1996. "The effect of financial statement classification of hybrid financial instruments on financial analysts' stock price judgments," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34, pages 33-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Ju Hyun, 2024. "De facto seniority in the primary market for corporate bonds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil Fargher & Baljit K. Sidhu & Ann Tarca & Warrick van Zyl, 2019. "Accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of debt and equity: finding a way forward," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 7-58, March.
    2. Steve Fortin & Ahmad Hammami & Michel Magnan, 2021. "Re‐exploring Fair Value Accounting and Value Relevance: An Examination of Underlying Securities," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(2), pages 220-250, June.
    3. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2021. "The effect of corporate governance and investor protection environments on the value relevance of new accounting standards: the case of IFRS 9 and IAS 39," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1241-1266, December.
    4. Jeremiah Green & Henock Louis & Jalal Sani, 2022. "Intangible Investments, Scaling, and the Trend in the Accrual–Cash Flow Association," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1551-1582, September.
    5. Koonce, Lisa & Mongold, Cassie & Quaid, Laura & White, Brian J., 2024. "Experimental research on standard-setting issues in financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Abdulrahman Alomair & Alan Farley & Helen Hong Yang, 2022. "The impact of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information in Saudi Arabia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2839-2878, June.
    7. Sudipta Bose & Amitav Saha & Indra Abeysekera, 2020. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure: Evidence from Regulatory Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 455-494, December.
    8. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & André, Paul & Evans, Lisa, 2012. "The transition to IFRS and the value relevance of financial statements in Greece," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 262-277.
    9. Giuseppe Maria Bifulco & Riccardo Savio & Francesco Paolone & Riccardo Tiscini, 2023. "The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3231-3241, November.
    10. Kalin S. Kolev, 2019. "Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-47, June.
    11. Stefania Veltri & Francesco De Luca & Ho‐Tan‐Phat Phan, 2020. "Do investors value companies' mandatory nonfinancial risk disclosure? An empirical analysis of the Italian context after the EU Directive," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2226-2237, September.
    12. Mingying Cheng & Joseph A. Micale, 2022. "ESG Risks and the Value Relevance of Current and Historical Earnings," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 207-237, December.
    13. Oliveira, Lídia & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 241-252.
    14. Juana Aledo Martínez & Juan Manuel García Lara & María T. González Pérez & Christos A. Grambovas, 2020. "An empirical assessment of proposed solutions for resolving scale problems in value relevance accounting research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3905-3933, December.
    15. Liao, Lin & Yao, Daifei (Troy) & Kang, Helen & Morris, Richard D., 2020. "The impact of legal efficacy on value relevance of the three-level fair value measurement hierarchy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Palea, Vera, 2014. "Are IFRS value-relevant for separate financial statements? Evidence from the Italian stock market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17.
    17. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Borozan, Miloš & Loreta, Cannito & Riccardo, Palumbo, 2022. "Eye-tracking for the study of financial decision-making: A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    19. Pandey, Ashish & Tripathi, Abhinava & Guhathakurta, Kousik, 2022. "The impact of banking regulations and accounting standards on estimating discretionary loan loss provisions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    20. Xitong Li & Hongwei Zhu & Luo Zuo, 2021. "Reporting Technologies and Textual Readability: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 1025-1042, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:19:y:2023:i:1:s1815566922000352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-contemporary-accounting-and-economics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.