IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v2y2011i1p36-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Network Mixing Patterns In Mergers & Acquisitions - A Simulation Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Fabac Robert

    (Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University Of Zagreb, Pavlinska 2, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

  • Schatten Markus

    (Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University Of Zagreb, Pavlinska 2, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

  • Đuričin Tomislav

    (Bio-Zrno d.o.o., Đure Sudete 42, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

Abstract

In the contemporary world of global business and continuously growing competition, organizations tend to use mergers and acquisitions to enforce their position on the market. The future organization's design is a critical success factor in such undertakings. The field of social network analysis can enhance our uderstanding of these processes as it lets us reason about the development of networks, regardless of their origin. The analysis of mixing patterns is particularly useful as it provides an insight into how nodes in a network connect with each other. We hypothesize that organizational networks with compatible mixing patterns will be integrated more successfully. After conducting a simulation experiment, we suggest an integration model based on the analysis of network assortativity. The model can be a guideline for organizational integration, such as occurs in mergers and acquisitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabac Robert & Schatten Markus & Đuričin Tomislav, 2011. "Social Network Mixing Patterns In Mergers & Acquisitions - A Simulation Experiment," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 2(1), pages 36-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:36-44
    DOI: 10.2478/v10305-012-0018-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10305-012-0018-9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10305-012-0018-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hagedoorn & Geert Duysters, 2002. "External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 167-188, March.
    2. Yildiz, H. Emre & Fey, Carl F., 2010. "Compatibility and unlearning in knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 448-456, December.
    3. Schuler, Randall & Jackson, Susan, 2001. "HR issues and activities in mergers and acquisitions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 239-253, June.
    4. Hogarty, Thomas F, 1970. "The Profitability of Corporate Mergers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(3), pages 317-327, July.
    5. Harford, Jarrad, 2005. "What drives merger waves?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 529-560, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todorović Ivan & Komazec Stefan & Čudanov Mladen, 2013. "Different Successful Patterns for Implementing Holding Model in Public Sector," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 58-67, December.
    2. Crnkovic Jakov (Yasha), 2013. "Invited Article: The Future of CRM is UX," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 4-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Waseem Bari & Qurrah-tul-ain & Muhammad Abrar & Meng Fanchen, 2022. "Employees’ responses to psychological contract breach: The mediating role of organizational cynicism," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 810-829, May.
    2. Gokkaya, Sinan & Liu, Xi & Stulz, René M., 2023. "Do firms with specialized M&A staff make better acquisitions?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 75-105.
    3. Jingyi Zhong & Weide Chun & Wu Deng & Hui Gao, 2023. "Can Mergers and Acquisitions Promote Technological Innovation in the New Energy Industry? An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Lithium Battery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Huyghebaert, Nancy & Luypaert, Mathieu, 2010. "Antecedents of growth through mergers and acquisitions: Empirical results from Belgium," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 392-403, April.
    5. Vlad Mares & Mikhael Shor, 2008. "Industry concentration in common value auctions: theory and evidence," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(1), pages 37-56, April.
    6. Fu, Fangjian & Lin, Leming & Officer, Micah S., 2013. "Acquisitions driven by stock overvaluation: Are they good deals?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 24-39.
    7. Yusnidah Ibrahim & Jimoh Olajide Raji, 2018. "Cross-border merger and acquisition activities in Asia: the role of macroeconomic factors," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 307-329, May.
    8. Rouine, Ibtissem, 2018. "Target country's leadership style and bidders' takeover decisions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 17-29.
    9. Xi Zhao & Meiling Tang, 2023. "CEO age and entry timing within industry merger waves: Evidence from China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 517-552, June.
    10. Mileidy Alvarez-Melgarejo & Martha Torres-Barreto, 2018. "Resources And Capabilties, The Investigation Of Their Relations: A Bibliometric Analysis [Recursos Y Capacidades, La Investigación De Sus Relaciones: Un Análisis Bibliométrico]," Working Papers hal-01744010, HAL.
    11. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Ming Yuan & Jingya Dang & Yujie Hong & Di Gao & Ziyi Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Supply Chain Network Centrality on Sustainable Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Frey, Rainer & Hussinger, Katrin, 2006. "The role of technology in M&As: a firm-level comparison of cross-border and domestic deals," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2006,45, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    14. Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew & Robinson, David T. & Viswanathan, S., 2005. "Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 561-603, September.
    15. Correia, Manuela Faia & Cunha, Rita Campos e & Scholten, Marc, 2013. "Impact of M&As on organizational performance: The moderating role of HRM centrality," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 323-332.
    16. Aktas, Nihat & Petmezas, Dimitris & Servaes, Henri & Karampatsas, Nikolaos, 2021. "Credit ratings and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Brett Hollenbeck, 2020. "Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, March.
    18. Massa, Massimo & dong, aileen & Zaldokas, Alminas, 2016. "Busted! Now What? Effects of Cartel Enforcement on Firm Value and Corporate Policies," CEPR Discussion Papers 11470, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Sharma, Revti Raman & Chowdhury, Sharmistha & Yu, Yang, 2024. "The Effect of Cross-border Acquisition Experience on Subsequent Cross-border Acquisitions: A Test of the S-shape Hypothesis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    20. Wang, Hao & Han, Yonghui & Fidrmuc, Jan & Wei, Dongming, 2021. "Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 237-256.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.