IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bec/imsber/v5y2013i1p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Placement And Consumer Brand Salience: Measuring The Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ovais

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Muhammad Nouman

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

Abstract

When the song ‘Pass the Courvoisier’ remained in Billboard’s hot 100 music Chart for around 20 weeks in addition to significant exposures on TV and radio networks. To the surprise of marketers and advertizing practitioners was meanwhile a double digit in the sales of ‘Courvoisier cognac’ the basic theme of this song. Many more such examples appeared on the marketing communication horizon indicating that such practices may lead to a more effective brand communication relative to conventional advertizing. Following an experimental design, the focus of this research was to analyze and understand the role of brand placement on consumer recognition and recall (salience) of that particular brand. Consistent with the previous literature we found significant brand salience related implications of brand placement in Pakistani context. The findings however also suggest for careful management of the placement strategies. Our findings provide new academic insights into and a foundation for researchers in this regard.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ovais & Muhammad Nouman, 2013. "Product Placement And Consumer Brand Salience: Measuring The Impact," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 5(1), pages 53-64, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:53-64
    DOI: dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/5.1.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://imsciences.edu.pk/files/journals/Vol.%205%20No.%201.%20April%202013/Paper%20(4).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/5.1.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hawkins, Scott A & Hoch, Stephen J, 1992. "Low-Involvement Learning: Memory without Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(2), pages 212-225, September.
    2. Law, Sharmistha & Hawkins, Scott A & Craik, Fergus I M, 1998. "Repetition-Induced Belief in the Elderly: Rehabilitating Age-Related Memory Deficits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 91-107, September.
    3. Russell, Cristel Antonia, 2002. "Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 306-318, December.
    4. Marc Vanhuele & Stephen J. S. Holden, 1999. "Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context," Post-Print hal-00457570, HAL.
    5. Janiszewski, Chris, 1993. "Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 376-392, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darren W Dahl & Eileen Fischer & Gita V Johar & Vicki G Morwitz, 2017. "Making Sense from (Apparent) Senselessness: The JCR Lens," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 719-723.
    2. Purnawirawan, Nathalia & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Dens, Nathalie, 2012. "Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 244-255.
    3. A. Reuber & Eileen Fischer, 2010. "Organizations Behaving Badly: When Are Discreditable Actions Likely to Damage Organizational Reputation?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 39-50, April.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4235 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Scott Wright & Chris Manolis & Drew Brown & Xiaoning Guo & John Dinsmore & C.-Y. Chiu & Frank Kardes, 2012. "Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 253-261, March.
    6. Kirk Kristofferson & Lea Dunn, 2023. "The brand that wasn’t there: The impact of brand displacement on viewer engagement and brand attitude," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 716-745, May.
    7. Sha Yang & Anindya Ghose, 2010. "Analyzing the Relationship Between Organic and Sponsored Search Advertising: Positive, Negative, or Zero Interdependence?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 602-623, 07-08.
    8. Shinhye Kim & Alberto Sa Vinhas & U.N. Umesh, 2022. "Prepayment and future cross-buying: an exploratory analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 415-439, September.
    9. S. Venus Jin & Aziz Muqaddam, 2019. "Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 522-537, September.
    10. George R. Milne & Begum Kaplan & Kristen L. Walker & Larry Zacharias, 2021. "Connecting with the future: The role of science fiction movies in helping consumers understand privacy‐technology trade‐offs," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 737-762, September.
    11. Koo, Minkyung & Shavitt, Sharon & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, 2020. "Engaging in a culturally mismatched thinking style increases the preference for familiar consumer options for analytic but not holistic thinkers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 837-852.
    12. Septianto, Felix & Ye, Sheng & Northey, Gavin, 2021. "The effectiveness of advertising images in promoting experiential offerings: An emotional response approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 344-352.
    13. Romain Cadario, 2015. "The impact of online word-of-mouth on television show viewership: An inverted U-shaped temporal dynamic," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 411-422, December.
    14. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    15. Jie Zhang & Yongjun Sung & Wei‐Na Lee, 2010. "To Play or Not to Play: An Exploratory Content Analysis of Branded Entertainment in Facebook," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 53-64, April.
    16. Rosbergen, Edward & Wedel, Michel & Pieters, Rik, 1997. "Analyzing visual attention tot repeated print advertising using scanpath theory," Research Report 97B32, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    17. Gurau Calin, 2010. "Advergames: Characteristics, Limitations And Potential," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 726-730, July.
    18. Horrigan, David, 2009. "Branded Content: A new Model for driving Tourism via Film and Branding Strategies," MPRA Paper 25419, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Aug 2009.
    19. Alagöz, Nazli, 2024. "Promotion and technological change in the music industry," Other publications TiSEM 511ceba0-62a0-4c60-a76c-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    21. Julie Guidry Moulard & Randle D. Raggio & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2021. "Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 96-118, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Attaullah Shah (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imspepk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.