IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i14p247-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Measurement Framework for Local Government: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Roziq

    (Doctoral Student, Doctor in Economics, Postgraduate School, University of Pancasila-Indonesia)

  • Sri Widyastuti

    (Professor, Doctor in Economics, Postgraduate School, University of Pancasila – Indonesia)

  • Widarto Rachbini

    (AssociateProfessor, Doctor in Economics, Postgraduate School, University of Pancasila – Indonesia)

Abstract

This research paper aims to provide a systematic literature review on the integration of the BSC with other performance measurement frameworks in evaluating local government performance. Effective performance measurement is crucial for local governments to evaluate their performance and drive continuous improvement. This systematic literature review explores the integration of two prominent performance measurement approaches, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Performance Measurement Framework (PMF), in evaluating local government performance. The review examines existing studies, frameworks, and practical implementations to uncover the benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with this integration. The data obtained from 36 most relevant articles to “balanced scorecard implementation†, performance measurement framework†, and “local government†or “municipalities†. The findings highlight that the integration of the BSC and PMF provides a comprehensive and strategic approach to performance measurement in local government. It enhances performance measurement practices by incorporating financial and non-financial indicators, aligns with organizational strategies, and promotes accountability and transparency. However, challenges such as defining relevant indicators, data availability, organizational buy-in, and resource constraints need to be addressed for successful implementation. The integrated model has practical implications, including the need for strong leadership support, stakeholder engagement, continuous monitoring, and capacity building. Future research should focus on empirical evaluations of the model’s effectiveness, contextual factors influencing its implementation, and long-term impacts on local government performance and governance. Policymakers can use the integrated model to develop evidence-based policies, allocate resources strategically, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Ultimately, the integrated performance measurement model has the potential to drive positive change and enhance service delivery in local government, contributing to better governance outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Roziq & Sri Widyastuti & Widarto Rachbini, 2025. "Performance Measurement Framework for Local Government: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 247-259, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:247-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-14/247-259.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/performance-measurement-framework-for-local-government-a-systematic-literature-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Zheng & Wei Wang & Wenbin Liu & John Mingers, 2019. "A performance management framework for the public sector: The balanced stakeholder model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(4), pages 568-580, April.
    2. Al-Alawi, Adel Ismail, 2018. "Using Balanced Scorecard In Measuring The Performance Of Online Banking: Cultivating Strategic Model Map In Financial Sector-Case Of Bahrain," Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, , vol. 23(02), pages 01-26, August.
    3. Brownlees, Christian & Chabot, Ben & Ghysels, Eric & Kurz, Christopher, 2020. "Back to the future: Backtesting systemic risk measures during historical bank runs and the great depression," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Sven Modell, 2012. "The politics of the balanced scorecard," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 475-489, October.
    5. Daria Balkovskaya & Liubov Filneva, 2016. "The use of the balanced scorecard in bank strategic management," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 48-67.
    6. Dag Øivind Madsen & Blerim Azizi & Albert Rushiti & Tonny Stenheim, 2019. "The Diffusion and Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard in the Norwegian Municipality Sector: A Descriptive Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-31, May.
    7. Sabina Nuti & Chiara Seghieri & Milena Vainieri, 2013. "Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 59-69, February.
    8. Christopher Mcnamara & Steven Mong, 2005. "Performance Measurement and Management: Some Insights from Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 14-28, March.
    9. Robert S. Kaplan, 2012. "The balanced scorecard: comments on balanced scorecard commentaries," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 539-545, October.
    10. Elekdag, Selim & Malik, Sheheryar & Mitra, Srobona, 2020. "Breaking the Bank? A Probabilistic Assessment of Euro Area Bank Profitability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    12. Marc Journeault, 2017. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 78-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyeon Kang & Fan Meng & Hyung Jong Na, 2025. "Evaluating the Current and Future of Corporation and Hotel Industry Performance by Analyzing CEO Messages Using the SBSC Framework Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-37, February.
    2. Muh. Ardiansyah Syam & Syahril Djaddang & Adam Adam & Endang Etty Merawati & Mohammad Roziq, 2024. "Carbon Accounting: Its Implications on Accounting Practices and Corporate Sustainability Reports," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 178-187, July.
    3. Nimrod Segev & Sigal Ribon & Michael Kahn & Jakob Haan, 2024. "Low Interest Rates and Banks’ Interest Margins: Does Deposit Market Concentration Matter?," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 65(2), pages 189-218, June.
    4. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    5. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    6. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    8. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.
    9. Dimes, Ruth & de Villiers, Charl, 2024. "Hallmarks of Integrated Thinking," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    10. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    11. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Francesca Casalini & Chiara Seghieri & Michele Emdin & Sabina Nuti, 2017. "Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 35-59.
    13. Rosanna Spanò & Adele Caldarelli & Luca Ferri & Marco Maffei, 2020. "Context, culture and control: a case study on accounting change in an Italian regional health service," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(1), pages 229-272, March.
    14. Jassem Suaad & Zakaria Zarina & Che Azmi Anna, 2020. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 193-210, January.
    15. Umar Ali Bukar & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor & Salfarina Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Mustafa Alabadla & Ali Alkhalifah, 2022. "How Advanced Technological Approaches Are Reshaping Sustainable Social Media Crisis Management and Communication: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Rui Silva & Cidália Oliveira, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation in Tangible and Intangible Resource Allocation: A Qualitative Multi Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Busch, Pascal & Cappelletti, Giuseppe & Marincas, Vlad & Meller, Barbara & Wildmann, Nadya, 2021. "How useful is market information for the identification of G-SIBs?," Occasional Paper Series 260, European Central Bank.
    18. Samara da Silva Neiva & Ramaswamy Arun Prasath & Wellyngton Silva de Amorim & Mauricio de Andrade Lima & Samuel Borges Barbosa & João Marcelo Pereira Ribeiro & Flávio Ceci & Jonas Schneider & André Bo, 2021. "Sustainable urban development: Can the balanced scorecard contribute to the strategic management of sustainable cities?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1155-1172, November.
    19. Jennifer Adolph & Markus Beckmann, 2024. "Corporate sustainability strategy: From definitional ambiguity toward conceptual clarification," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4708-4729, July.
    20. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:247-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.