IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i9p618-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Continuous Improvement to Increase the Efficiency of the Production Process through Press Dies Design

Author

Listed:
  • Aris Prihandoko

    (Industrial Engineering, Wisnuwardhana University Malang, Indonesia)

  • Sunyoto

    (Industrial Engineering, Wisnuwardhana University Malang, Indonesia)

  • Sarbini

    (Industrial Engineering, Wisnuwardhana University Malang, Indonesia)

Abstract

In the manufacturing industry, there are companies that operate in the metal forming sector. Many products are produced by the metal forming process, one of which is the packaging box lock hook. The key hook is a component part of the packaging box which functions as a hook so that the packaging box can be closed and locked. In the production of key hooks there is waste, namely over processing, which reduces the efficiency of production time. To reduce this problem, improvement efforts were made by implementing continuous improvement using the DMAIC method. Continuous improvement steps are carried out by direct observation in the field to find problems. After that, measurements and analysis are carried out to determine improvements that will be implemented. Then the improvement stage was carried out as an implementation of continuous improvement. Continuous improvement resulted in a press dies design for the key hook piercing process. By designing new press dies, production time efficiency will be achieved. After carrying out Continuous Improvement, it resulted in an increase in the efficiency of the number of processes from 6 processes to 5 processes and the total production time in 1 cycle from 13.3 hours to 11.4 hours or 1.9 hours faster or an increase in efficiency of 13.3 % of the total time before Continuous Improvement. And 50% increase in sub piercing process.

Suggested Citation

  • Aris Prihandoko & Sunyoto & Sarbini, 2024. "Implementation of Continuous Improvement to Increase the Efficiency of the Production Process through Press Dies Design," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 618-628, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:618-628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-9/618-628.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/implementation-of-continuous-improvement-to-increase-the-efficiency-of-the-production-process-through-press-dies-design/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Ron, Ad J., 1998. "Sustainable production: The ultimate result of a continuous improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 99-110, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram, 2004. "A methodology for strategic sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 236-250, April.
    2. Schoenherr, Tobias, 2012. "The role of environmental management in sustainable business development: A multi-country investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 116-128.
    3. Harvey H. Millar & Suzana N. Russell, 2011. "The Adoption of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in the Caribbean," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 512-526, December.
    4. Yalabik, Baris & Fairchild, Richard J., 2011. "Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 519-527, June.
    5. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    6. Seung‐Kyu Rhee & Su‐Yol Lee, 2003. "Dynamic change of corporate environmental strategy: rhetoric and reality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 175-190, May.
    7. de Brito, Marisa P. & Carbone, Valentina & Blanquart, Corinne Meunier, 2008. "Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 534-553, August.
    8. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili & Haitham Nobanee, 2023. "Impact of economic, environmental, and corporate social responsibility reporting on financial performance of UAE banks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 3967-3983, May.
    9. Smith, Leigh & Ball, Peter, 2012. "Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 227-238.
    10. Thoumy, Mira & Vachon, Stephan, 2012. "Environmental projects and financial performance: Exploring the impact of project characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 28-34.
    11. González-Benito, Javier & González-Benito, Óscar, 2005. "Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano & Perin, Elisa, 2015. "Embeddedness and path dependence of organizational capabilities for mass customization and green management: A longitudinal case study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 253-276.
    13. Sarah Elena Windolph & Dorli Harms & Stefan Schaltegger, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 272-285, September.
    14. Luo, Zongwei & Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Hazen, Benjamin & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Sustainable production framework for cement manufacturing firms: A behavioural perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 495-502.
    15. Wang, Chun-Hsien & Lu, Iuan-Yuan & Chen, Chin-Bein, 2010. "Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with non-additive fuzzy integral for evaluating high technology firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 413-426, November.
    16. Gimenez, Cristina & Sierra, Vicenta & Rodon, Juan, 2012. "Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 149-159.
    17. Zhu, Qinghua, 2016. "Institutional pressures and support from industrial zones for motivating sustainable production among Chinese manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 402-409.
    18. Shivam Goyal & Dixit Garg & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Sustainable production and consumption: analysing barriers and solutions for maintaining green tomorrow by using fuzzy-AHP–fuzzy-TOPSIS hybrid framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16934-16980, November.
    19. Nobanee, Haitham & Ellili, Nejla, 2016. "Corporate sustainability disclosure in annual reports: Evidence from UAE banks: Islamic versus conventional," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1336-1341.
    20. González-Benito, Javier & González-Benito, Óscar, 2008. "Operations management practices linked to the adoption of ISO 14001: An empirical analysis of Spanish manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 60-73, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:618-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.