IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i3sp4795-4823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ID Model: Classification and Criteria of an Impressive Drawing in Art and Design Perspectives for Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Abdullah

    (Faculty of Art, Sustainability and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Zahuri Khairani

    (Faculty of Art, Sustainability and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Fareez Vincent Amos

    (Faculty of Art, Sustainability and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Nasiruddin Abdul Aziz

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

Drawing is widely recognised as a fundamental skill in higher education, particularly in art and design fields, where it plays a pivotal role in creative expression and technical development. However, assessing impressive drawings presents challenges due to the subjective nature of creativity and the evolving standards of art education. This study aims to develop a conceptual model that offers a structured approach for educators and students to evaluate impressive drawings effectively. Using qualitative research methods and inductive content analysis of literature from 2019 to 2024, the study identifies key components of impressive drawing, such as technical proficiency, creativity, conceptual depth, and visual communication. The findings highlight a shift in teaching practices, driven by historical and contemporary perspectives, and explore the integration of digital tools with traditional techniques in art and design education. The study acknowledges the inherent subjectivity in drawing assessments and recommends developing a more objective and consistent evaluation system that still preserves creative expression. The proposed ID model balances technical skill with creativity, providing a framework for improving assessment practices and guiding students toward meeting the expectations of impressive drawings. This model adapts to the evolving needs of the field, contributing to ongoing discourse in art and design education.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Abdullah & Mohd Zahuri Khairani & Fareez Vincent Amos & Mohd Nasiruddin Abdul Aziz & Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad, 2024. "ID Model: Classification and Criteria of an Impressive Drawing in Art and Design Perspectives for Higher Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 4795-4823, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:4795-4823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-3s/4795-4823.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/id-model-classification-and-criteria-of-an-impressive-drawing-in-art-and-design-perspectives-for-higher-education/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa G. Bublitz & Tracy Rank-Christman & Luca Cian & Xavier Cortada & Adriana Madzharov & Vanessa M. Patrick & Laura A. Peracchio & Maura L. Scott & Aparna Sundar & Ngoc (Rita) To & Claudia Townsen, 2019. "Collaborative Art: A Transformational Force within Communities," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 313-331.
    2. Susan J. Paik & Lindsey Kunisaki & Vinh Q. Tran & Iraise Garcia, 2021. "Developing talent into creative eminence: Understanding the productive giftedness of world class artists," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1-2), pages 15-31, July.
    3. Moayerian, Neda & McGehee, Nancy G. & Stephenson, Max O., 2022. "Community cultural development: Exploring the connections between collective art making, capacity building and sustainable community-based tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Jonah Berger & Yoon Duk Kim & Robert Meyer & J. Jeffrey Inman & Andrew T Stephen, 2021. "What Makes Content Engaging? How Emotional Dynamics Shape Success," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(2), pages 235-250.
    6. Shaorong Ji & Pang-Soong Lin, 2022. "Aesthetics of Sustainability: Research on the Design Strategies for Emotionally Durable Visual Communication Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nappert, Pier-Luc & Plante, Maude, 2023. "The assetization of baseball players: Instrumentalizing promise with signing bonuses and human capital contracts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Cui, Geng & Chung, Yuho & Peng, Ling & Wang, Qiaofei, 2024. "Clicks for money: Predicting video views through a sentiment analysis of titles and thumbnails," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Jiyeon Hong & Paul R. Hoban, 2022. "Writing More Compelling Creative Appeals: A Deep Learning-Based Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 941-965, September.
    4. Hamby, Anne & Kim, Hongmin & Spezzano, Francesca, 2024. "Sensational stories: The role of narrative characteristics in distinguishing real and fake news and predicting their spread," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Seyed Mohsen Mirbagheri & Ata Ollah Rafiei Atani & Mohammadreza Parsanejad, 2023. "The Effect of Collective Decision-Making on Productivity: A Structural Equation Modeling," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Dr. Betty Muthoni Njagi, 2022. "Community Service Learning as a New Discourse of Communion of Purpose for the Wellbeing of the Human Person," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 205-210, November.
    7. Meng Gao & Ke Ma & Renke He & Carlo Vezzoli & Nuo Li, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Product Design Methods from 1999 to 2022: Trends, Progress, and Disparities between China and the Rest of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Jonah Berger & Grant Packard & Reihane Boghrati & Ming Hsu & Ashlee Humphreys & Andrea Luangrath & Sarah Moore & Gideon Nave & Christopher Olivola & Matthew Rocklage, 2022. "Marketing insights from text analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 365-377, September.
    9. Cheng Long & Song Lu & Jie Chang & Jiaheng Zhu & Luqiao Chen, 2022. "Tourism Environmental Carrying Capacity Review, Hotspot, Issue, and Prospect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Apostol, Oana & Mäkelä, Hannele & Vinnari, Eija, 2023. "Cultural sustainability and the construction of (in)commensurability: cultural heritage at the Roşia Montană mining site," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Rubin, Dan & Mohr, Iris & Kumar, V., 2022. "Beyond the box office: A conceptual framework for the drivers of audience engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 473-488.
    12. Jeacle, Ingrid, 2022. "The gendered nature of valuation: Valuing life in the Titanic compensation claims process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:4795-4823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.