IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v99y2022ics0361368221000878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The gendered nature of valuation: Valuing life in the Titanic compensation claims process

Author

Listed:
  • Jeacle, Ingrid

Abstract

The sinking of the Titanic has captured the public imagination for over a century. A tragic tale of man's powerlessness over nature, it has served as a lesson in hubris that has been dramatized in film and immortalised in popular culture. Following the disaster, relatives of the deceased lodged compensation claims against the White Star Line (registered owners of the Titanic). In these compensation claims for loss of life we witness the monetary commensuration of life. For the accounting scholar, therefore, the Titanic story offers an opportunity to contribute to the growing body of research in the area of valuation; in particular, it facilitates an understanding of the valuing of human life. Drawing on the history of life assurance and compensation legislation in both the UK and US, the paper argues that by the time of the Titanic disaster in 1912, an accounting constellation (Burchell et al., 1995) had been formed which established an equivalence between the value of a life and economic earning power. However, while this earnings based model determined the value of men lost in the tragedy, it failed to commensurate the lives of women and children. Rather emotion and sentiment arising from the high profile nature of the disaster appeared to allow for a plurality of other valuations to emerge that ruptured the pre-configured constellation and challenged the linear trajectory of the economic model. As such, Titanic was a “valuation event” which severely disrupted the existing gendered assemblage. The contribution of this paper therefore is to recognise the gendered nature of valuation and to appreciate the impact of such gender bias on the practice of valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeacle, Ingrid, 2022. "The gendered nature of valuation: Valuing life in the Titanic compensation claims process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0361368221000878
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368221000878
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Brown & Pierre McDonagh & Clifford J. Shultz II, 2013. "Titanic: Consuming the Myths and Meanings of an Ambiguous Brand," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 595-614.
    2. Hans Kjellberg & Alexandre Mallard & Diane-Laure Arjaliès & Patrik Aspers & Stefan Beljean & Alexandra Bidet & Alberto Corsin & Emmanuel Didier & Marion Fourcade & Susi Geiger & Klaus Hoeyer & Michèle, 2013. "Valuation studies ? Our collective two cents," Post-Print hal-00827390, HAL.
    3. Beckert, Jens & Aspers, Patrik (ed.), 2011. "The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199594658.
    4. Liz Mcfall, 2009. "The Agencement Of Industrial Branch Life Assurance," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1-2), pages 49-65, July.
    5. Coslor, Erica, 2016. "Transparency in an opaque market: Evaluative frictions between “thick” valuation and “thin” price data in the art market," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 13-26.
    6. Hopwood, Anthony G., 1983. "On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(2-3), pages 287-305, May.
    7. Liliana Doganova & Martin Giraudeau & Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Hans Kjellberg & Francis Lee & Alexandre Mallard & Andrea Mennicken & Fabian Muniesa & Ebba Sjögren & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, 2014. "Valuation studies and the critique of valuation," Post-Print halshs-01112051, HAL.
    8. Svetlova, Ekaterina, 2018. "Value without valuation? An example of the cocos market," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 69-78.
    9. Kieran Healy & Kimberly D. Krawiec, 2017. "Repugnance Management and Transactions in the Body," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 86-90, May.
    10. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Crepaz, Lukas & Huber, Christian & Scheytt, Tobias, 2016. "Governing arts through valuation: The role of the state as network actor in the European Capital of Culture 2010," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 35-50.
    12. Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Fabian Muniesa, 2013. "For What It's Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies," Post-Print halshs-00817375, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Patrick Gregori & Patrick Holzmann, 2022. "Entrepreneurial practices and the constitution of environmental value for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3302-3317, November.
    3. Vargha, Zsuzsanna, 2016. "Note from the editor: The results of accounting," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(2), pages 2-6.
    4. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    5. Huguenin, Ariane & Jeannerat, Hugues, 2017. "Creating change through pilot and demonstration projects: Towards a valuation policy approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 624-635.
    6. Hauge, Amalie Martinus, 2018. "Situated valuations: Affordances of management technologies in organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 245-255.
    7. Hayoun, Shaul, 2019. "How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: The irreducibility of value constellations to market prices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    8. Galina Kallio, 2020. "A carrot isn’t a carrot isn’t a carrot: tracing value in alternative practices of food exchange," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1095-1109, December.
    9. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    10. Nappert, Pier-Luc & Plante, Maude, 2023. "The assetization of baseball players: Instrumentalizing promise with signing bonuses and human capital contracts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Ren, Carina & Mahadevan, Renuka, 2018. "“Bring the numbers and stories together”: Valuing events," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 75-84.
    12. Carmona, Salvador & Donoso, Rafael & Walker, Stephen P., 2010. "Accounting and international relations: Britain, Spain and the Asiento treaty," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 252-273, February.
    13. Nicolas Berland & Yves Levant & Vassili Joannides, 2009. "Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of budget. Symmetrical analysis of rhetoric associated to the introduction of budget and “beyond budgeting”," Post-Print hal-01661710, HAL.
    14. Antonelli, Valerio & Bigoni, Michele & Funnell, Warwick & Mattia Cafaro, Emanuela & Deidda Gagliardo, Enrico, 2023. "Popular culture and totalitarianism: Accounting for propaganda in Italy under the Fascist regime (1934–1945)," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Alcaniz, Leire & Gomez-Bezares, Fernando & Roslender, Robin, 2011. "Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 104-117.
    16. Marisa Agostini & Riccardo Cella & Giovanni Favero, 2017. "Accounting fraud in a pre-modern historical context: An accounting investigation on the use of market (fair) value in the second half of the eighteenth century in Venice," Working Papers 12, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5670 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Bryer, R. A., 2005. "A Marxist accounting history of the British industrial revolution: a review of evidence and suggestions for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 25-65, January.
    19. Allan Hansen, 2011. "Relating performative and ostensive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 108-138, June.
    20. Ejiogu, Amanze & Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Ejiogu, Chibuzo, 2021. "Accounting for accounting’s role in the neoliberalization processes of social housing in England: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    21. Pollock, Neil & D’Adderio, Luciana, 2012. "Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 565-586.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0361368221000878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.