IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2020i2p92-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges of the National Innovation System for the Application of Open Innovation Practices in the Republic of North Macedonia

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Drangovska
  • Marica Antovska-Mitev

Abstract

Nowadays, products become increasingly complex, their development and production is a result of the application of a wide range of external ideas, technologies and knowledge. In the complex economy, it is impossible for any single enterprise to keep abreast of all modern technologies. In the production process enterprises include development of specialized knowledge assets, using a wide range of knowledge from different areas. At the same time, enterprises make their specialized knowledge assets available for usage by the other actors. Those activities are referred as open innovation practices. The great interest in applying the open innovation practices is a result of the positive impact that open innovation has on the enterprise performance and on the overall economic system as a central element in the modern knowledge-based societies. However, for successful implementation of the open innovation practices, which is essentially based on the cooperation between the key actors within the national innovation systems, government, academy and the business sector, there is a need for significant institutional support at a national level, a developed innovation system and a particularly developed system for technology and knowledge transfer. Hence, the paper primarily analyzes the institutional factors (national innovation system), with a view to the institutional and financial support in cooperation and knowledge transfer. At the same time, an analysis of the innovation of the Macedonian business sector is made, with particular emphasis on the application of open innovation practices in terms of the representation of the key model dimensions in the enterprises. On the basis of the analysis made, conclusions are presented and measures are proposed to improve the environment for applying the open innovation practices in the Macedonian business sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Drangovska & Marica Antovska-Mitev, 2020. "Challenges of the National Innovation System for the Application of Open Innovation Practices in the Republic of North Macedonia," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 92-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2020:i:2:p:92-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2020/2020-2/5_Marica_f-f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias Carayannis & David Campbell, 2011. "Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge ," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(3), pages 327-372, September.
    2. Gregory Scott & Ian Chaston, 2013. "Open innovation in an emerging economy," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 1024-1036, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marica Antovska-Mitev & Tatjana Drangovska, 2022. "Development of the Macedonian Business Sector and Its Innovation Activities from the Early Transition Years until Today (1991-2021)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 80-97.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel González-López & Ivano Dileo & Francesco Losurdo, 2014. "University-Industry Collaboration in the European Regional Context: the Cases of Galicia and Apulia Region," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(3), pages 57-88.
    2. Shantha Indrajith Hikkaduwa Liyanage & Fulu Godfrey Netswera, 2022. "Greening Universities with Mode 3 and Quintuple Helix Model of Innovation–Production of Knowledge and Innovation in Knowledge-Based Economy, Botswana," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1126-1156, June.
    3. Weshah Razzak, 2023. "Research Effort and Economic Growth," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2318-2340, September.
    4. Sérgio Nunes & Raul Lopes & Nerys Fuller-Love, 2019. "Networking, Innovation, and Firms’ Performance: Portugal as Illustration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 899-920, September.
    5. Sul Kassicieh, 2016. "Technology Entrepreneurship: Progress of a Clinical Approach Through Time," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "How to Analyze Bioeconomy?," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(6), December.
    7. Christian Tabi Amponsah & Samuel Adams, 2017. "Open Innovation: Systematisation Of Knowledge Exploration And Exploitation For Commercialisation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Luciano Barcellos-Paula & Iván De la Vega & Anna María Gil-Lafuente, 2021. "The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Veronica Scuotto & Gabriele Santoro & Armando Papa & Elias G. Carayannis, 2017. "Triggering open service innovation through social media networks," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 21-40.
    10. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    11. Sorin Cohn & Barry Gander & Jennifer Percival & Tamas Koplyay, 2016. "Managing Progress Towards Intelligent Community Status with the i-CAT Assessment Tools," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 172-192, March.
    12. Yuanyuan Lin & Nianqi Deng & Hailian Gao, 2018. "Research on Technological Innovation Efficiency of Tourist Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.
    14. Robert Stanisławski, 2020. "Open Innovation as a Value Chain for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Determinants of the Use of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Sophie Boutillier, 2019. "Small Entrepreneurship, Knowledge and Social Resources in a Heavy Industrial Territory. The Case of Eco-Innovations in Dunkirk, North of France," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 997-1018, September.
    16. Orlykovskyi, Mykola & Wicki, Ludwik & Maciejczak, Mariusz & Galchynska, Yulia, 2016. "Rozwój biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy na Ukrainie – w kierunku systemu dyfuzji innowacji opartego o model poczwórnej helisy," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 16(31), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Elias G. Carayannis & Stelios Rozakis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2018. "Agri-science to agri-business: the technology transfer dimension," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 837-843, August.
    18. Daniela MajerÄ Ã¡ková & Mittelman Alexandra & Michal GreguÅ¡, 2021. "Wine as an Investment Opportunity," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, January -.
    19. Miron Dumitru & Gherasim Ioan Alexandru, 2018. "Linking the triple helix (university-industry-government) to the quadruple helix of university-industry-government – civil society in the field of international business and economics," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 612-625, May.
    20. Björn Sautter, 2021. "Shaping Digital Ecosystems for Sustainable Production: Assessing the Policy Impact of the 2030 Vision for Industrie 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2020:i:2:p:92-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.