IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v3y2024i13p100-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building a model for evaluating the efficiency of circular transformations in the context of technology transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Viktoriia Prokhorova

    (Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy)

  • Olga Shkurenko

    (State University of Infrastructure and Technologies)

  • Olha Kravchenko

    (State University of Infrastructure and Technologies)

  • Iryna Miahkykh

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design)

  • Volodymyr Dalyk

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Olha Kostiuk

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Olena Makovoz

    (Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy)

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of circular transformations in the context of technology transfer. It has been proven that circular transformations in the context of technology transfer are a new challenge in the global directions of harmonization of economic processes. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that the development of technologies, in particular "green" technologies under modern conditions has become a catalyst for changes in production, consumption, and management of resources, which contributes to the achievement of the goals of sustainable development of enterprises. This involves focusing on the formation and support of social integration of the production sector and society, reducing emissions into the environment, and ensuring the balanced development of business entities at different levels of management. The characteristics of the level of circular transformations in the countries of the world were studied. The relationship between technology transfer and circular transformations was established through indicators of the degree of greening of the economy. A SWOT analysis of circular transformations was conducted to identify key opportunities and threats that would affect the business environment. A model for evaluating the effectiveness of circular transformations has been built. Based on the proposed model, the GDP change forecast for the EU countries for 2023–2027 was calculated. Carbon dioxide emission trends were predicted under optimistic and pessimistic scenarios, which made it possible to justify the need to transition to a carbon-neutral model of economic development and the feasibility of implementing "green" technologies. The transition to a new model of economic development will allow for optimal management of depleted resources, wider use of resource-saving technologies and will reduce pressure on the environment

Suggested Citation

  • Viktoriia Prokhorova & Olga Shkurenko & Olha Kravchenko & Iryna Miahkykh & Volodymyr Dalyk & Olha Kostiuk & Olena Makovoz, 2024. "Building a model for evaluating the efficiency of circular transformations in the context of technology transfer," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(13 (129)), pages 100-112, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:3:y:2024:i:13:p:100-112
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2024.303992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/download/303992/298431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.303992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferreira, João J.M. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2020. "Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Dieter Helm, 2020. "The Environmental Impacts of the Coronavirus," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 21-38, May.
    3. Wang, Shuhong & Wang, Xiaoqing & Lu, Binbin, 2022. "Is resource abundance a curse for green economic growth? Evidence from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Viktoriia Prokhorova & Svitlana Mushnykova & Denys Kovalenko & Orest Koleshchuk & Anatoliy Babichev, 2023. "Convergence of educational technologies as an imperative for the development of innovation cooperation in the context of circular transformation," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(13 (124)), pages 26-35, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yujin Jeong & Hyejin Jang & Byungun Yoon, 2021. "Developing a risk-adaptive technology roadmap using a Bayesian network and topic modeling under deep uncertainty," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3697-3722, May.
    2. Hugo S. Gonçalves & Sérgio Moro, 2023. "On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 375-394, February.
    3. Raihan, Asif, 2024. "The influences of economic progress, natural resources, and capitalization on financial development in the United States," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    4. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Bruno Marques & Jacqueline McIntosh & Chitrakala Muthuveerappan & Krzysztof Herman, 2022. "The Importance of Outdoor Spaces during the COVID-19 Lockdown in Aotearoa—New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Haoyun Meng & Peidong Deng & Jinbo Zhang, 2022. "Nonlinear Impact of Circulation-Industry Intelligentization on the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Yan, Xiang & Han, Zhiyong & Zou, Chen & Cheng, Changgao, 2024. "Assessing the role of emerging green technology transfer in sustainable development and identification of key regions in Yangtze River Delta region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Wang, Shuhong & Tian, Wenqian & Lu, Binbin, 2023. "Impact of capital investment and industrial structure optimization from the perspective of "resource curse": Evidence from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. David Klenert & Franziska Funke & Linus Mattauch & Brian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 751-778, August.
    13. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Finance and the reallocation of scientific, engineering and mathematical talent," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    14. Kraus, Sascha & Rehman, Shafique Ur & García, F. Javier Sendra, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Murat Cetin & Harun Demir & Selin Saygin, 2021. "Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Income Inequality: Time Series Evidence from Turkey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 47-69, July.
    16. Murtaza Mohammadi & John Calautit, 2022. "Quantifying the Transmission of Outdoor Pollutants into the Indoor Environment and Vice Versa—Review of Influencing Factors, Methods, Challenges and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Hervé Guyomard & Vincent Réquillart & Louis-Georges Soler, 2020. "Changing Agricultural Systems and Food Diets to Prevent and Mitigate Global Health Shocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Joana Carolina, Chaves-Vargas & Gabriela, Ribes-Giner & Ismael, Moya-Clemente, 2024. "Effect of the economic, social and technological factors on sustainable entrepreneurship over time," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:3:y:2024:i:13:p:100-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.