IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v33y2024i2p521-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Behavioural Intentions In Correlation With Contextual Cues And Financial Literacy €“ A Hungarian Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Zentai

    (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Judit Kovacs

    (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Efforts to improve financial literacy often deal with enhancing financial knowledge, but this approach's long-term effectiveness is limited (Fernandes et al., 2014). Our study examined how financial behaviour can be influenced by nudge interventions and how their efficacy depends on financial literacy levels. We used three interventions: defaults, priming, and pre-commitment strategies (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008). We expected that people with lower levels of finan-cial literacy would be more impacted by contextual cues. While a lot of studies have been conducted focusing on various aspects of financial literacy, to our knowledge, there have been no studies examining the effectiveness of nudge interventions with regard to the level of financial literacy. We surveyed 158 Hungarian adults using a questionnaire about financial literacy (OECD / INFE Toolkit for Measuring Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion, 2018). Sub-jects were divided into groups with different interventions. In case of defaults, participants were shown a hypothetical investment portfolio overweight in ei-ther stocks or bonds and asked whether they would invest new money in stocks or bonds, expecting them to consider the overweight asset class. For priming, one group saw positive financial market images, while another saw negative images. Based on the priming effect of visual cues we expected those exposed to positive images to prefer investing in risky assets (stocks) and those exposed to negative images to prefer safer investments. With pre-commitment, participants chose between saving for their children's education or investing in risky assets. Group 1 made no commitment to their partners, while Group 2 did. We expected those who pre-committed to be more likely to save money. Results showed de-faults had the most impact on decisions. In the case of priming, more people chose the expected option but, similar to pre-commitment strategies, did not prove to be statistically significant. Surprisingly, people with high financial literacy were as influenced by nudges as those with lower literacy. In conclu-sion, defaults effectively influence financial decisions, and people with high financial literacy are equally susceptible to contextual cues. Our study's limita-tion was the generally high financial literacy of the participants, suggesting future studies should include those with lower literacy for more representative results.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Zentai & Judit Kovacs, 2024. "Financial Behavioural Intentions In Correlation With Contextual Cues And Financial Literacy €“ A Hungarian Empirical Study," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 33(2), pages 521-537, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:521-537
    DOI: 10.17818/EMIP/2024/2.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/466819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17818/EMIP/2024/2.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    2. James J. Choi, 2015. "Contributions to Defined Contribution Pension Plans," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 161-178, December.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    4. Angela Hung & Andrew Parker & Joanne K. Yoong, 2009. "Defining and Measuring Financial Literacy," Working Papers 708, RAND Corporation.
    5. Angela A. Hung & Andrew M. Parker & Joanne K. Yoong, 2009. "Defining and Measuring Financial Literacy," Working Papers WR-708, RAND Corporation.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    3. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    4. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    5. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Karle, Heiko & Schumacher, Heiner & Vølund, Rune, 2023. "Consumer loss aversion and scale-dependent psychological switching costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-237.
    7. Fisch, Jill E. & Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess & Firth, Kristin, 2016. "Investor financial literacy in the workplace," CFS Working Paper Series 554, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    8. Walter Bossert & Yves Sprumont, 2009. "Non‐Deteriorating Choice," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 76(302), pages 337-363, April.
    9. Alfonso Arellano & Noelia Camara & David Tuesta, 2014. "El efecto de la autoconfianza en el conocimiento financiero," Working Papers 1427, BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department.
    10. Barr, Rhona F. & Mourato, Susana, 2014. "Investigating fishers' preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-103.
    11. Jidong Zhou, 2011. "Reference Dependence and Market Competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 1073-1097, December.
    12. Daniele Pennesi, 2013. "Endogenous Status Quo," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 314, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    13. Hasan-Basri, Bakti & Yahya, Nurul & Musa, Rusmani, 2013. "Status Quo Effect and Preferences Uncertainty: A Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV) Model," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 47(1), pages 163-172.
    14. Mercè Roca & Robin Hogarth & A. Maule, 2006. "Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 175-194, May.
    15. Andreassen, Gøril L. & Kallbekken, Steffen & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2024. "Can policy packaging help overcome Pigouvian tax aversion? A lab experiment on combining taxes and subsidies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Ulrich Schmidt & Stefan Traub, 2009. "An Experimental Investigation of the Disparity Between WTA and WTP for Lotteries," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 229-262, March.
    17. Inman, J.J. & Zeelenberg, M., 2002. "Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions : The attenuating role of decision justifiability," Other publications TiSEM 44060120-bd30-40e0-a97f-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Meloria Meschi & Carla Pace, 2012. "Accounting for Behavioral Biases for Non-biased Demand Estimations," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail, chapter 24, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Thomas Demuynck, 2014. "The computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 529-549, March.
    20. Robert W. Hahn & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 267-294.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nudge; behavioural finance; financial literacy; dual processing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • G53 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Financial Literacy
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:521-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.