IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v14y2016i137p551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of budgetary goals impacting organizational performance

Author

Listed:
  • Cheok MUI YEE

    (University of Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Edward WONG SEK KHIN

    (University of Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Kamisah ISMAIL

    (University of Malaya, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study proposes a conceptual review of how budgetary goals impact organizational performance. The aim of this study is to get a better understanding of the direct and indirect relationship between the organization’s decision-making process and operational performances. Setting the budget particularly influences subordinates’ budget goal levels and motivations (i.e., budget goal acceptance and budget goal commitment), which ultimately enhances the organization’s performance. To test these relationships, data were collected using the three perspectives approach: budgetary goal, budgetary participation and budgetary evaluation. The study provided evidence that perception of fairness mediates the relation between the levels of budget participation and goal commitment, whereas goal commitment mediates the relation between fairness perceptions and performance. At the end of the article, there are some implications for SMEs industries and some suggestions for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheok MUI YEE & Edward WONG SEK KHIN & Kamisah ISMAIL, 2016. "An analysis of budgetary goals impacting organizational performance," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(137), pages 551-551, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:137:p:551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9475.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nouri, H. & Parker, R. J., 1998. "The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 467-483.
    2. Tsui, Judy S. L., 2001. "The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems, and managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 125-146, May.
    3. R.T. Hamilton & D.A. Harper, 1994. "The Entrepreneur in Theory and Practice," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(6), pages 3-18, October.
    4. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Chia, Yew Ming, 1994. "The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(4-5), pages 413-426.
    5. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2014. "Managerial incentive, organizational slack, and performance: empirical analysis of Japanese firms’ behavior," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 245-284, February.
    6. Rahimah Mohamed Yunos & Zubaidah Ismail & Malcolm Smith, 2012. "Ethnicity and accounting conservatism: Malaysian evidence," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 34-57, May.
    7. Campbell, Donald J. & Gingrich, Karl F., 1986. "The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: A field experiment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 162-180, October.
    8. Vincent Chong & Kar Chong, 1997. "Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 268-276.
    9. Renn, Robert W., 1998. "Participation's effect on task performance: Mediating roles of goal acceptance and procedural justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 115-125, February.
    10. Jermias, Johnny & Setiawan, Trisnawati, 2008. "The moderating effects of hierarchy and control systems on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 268-292, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Mihaela IONESCU & Cristina Elena BÎGIOI, 2016. "Performance management through budgets. Drafting and launching the company’s sales budget," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(139), pages 789-789.
    2. Ionela Ursu & Iuliana Georgescu, 2022. "Planning With Or Without Budgets? The €Œnew Controlling†Approach," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 30, pages 105-118, December.
    3. Dakhli Anissa, 2021. "Budget behaviour and cultural contingencies: case study in a Tunisian company," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(2), pages 19-30, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Maiga & Anders Nilsson & Fred Jacobs, 2014. "Assessing the impact of budgetary participation on budgetary outcomes: the role of information technology for enhanced communication and activity-based costing," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-32, September.
    2. Adrien Bonache & Jonathan Maurice & Karen Moris & Irène Georgescu, 2009. "Enseignements d'une meta-analyse sur le lien participation budgétaire - performance managériale," Post-Print halshs-00460130, HAL.
    3. Teerooven Soobaroyen & Bhagtaraj Poorundersing, 2008. "The effectiveness of management accounting systems: Evidence from functional managers in a developing country," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(2), pages 187-219, January.
    4. Mirna Indriani & Nadirsyah, 2015. "Interaction Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Management Accounting System On Managerial Performance: Evidence From Indonesia," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    6. Cadez, Simon & Guilding, Chris, 2008. "An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 836-863.
    7. Zhu, Qi & Jin, Sisi & Huang, Yuxuan & Yan, Cheng, 2022. "Oil price uncertainty and stock price informativeness: Evidence from listed U.S. companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Zohreh Hajiha, 2011. "Effective Factors on Alignment of Accounting Information Systems in Manufacturing Companies: Evidence from Iran," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(3), pages 158-170.
    9. Manuela Macinati & Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2018. "Il ruolo di moderazione dell?identit? professionale medica nella relazione tra partecipazione al processo di budget e performance dei medici responsabili di struttura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(106), pages 11-36.
    10. Macinati, Manuela S. & Anessi-Pessina, E., 2014. "Management accounting use and financial performance in public health-care organisations: Evidence from the Italian National Health Service," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 98-111.
    11. Soon-Yau Foong & Neilson Anak Teruki, 2009. "Cost-system functionality and the performance of the Malaysian palm oil industry," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 17(3), pages 212-225, September.
    12. Jihène Ghorbel, 2015. "Approche Contingente Du Design Du Systeme D'Information Comptable Dans Les Pmi Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188692, HAL.
    13. Iryna Alves & Sofia M. Lourenço, 2022. "The use of non-financial performance measures for managerial compensation: evidence from SMEs," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 151-187, June.
    14. Utz Schäffer & Michael Zyder, 2007. "Eine Analyse des moderierenden Einflusses der Faktoren Wettbewerbsintensität, Marktdynamik und dezentrale Autonomie auf die erfolgreiche Gestaltung der Budgetierung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 7-33, April.
    15. Adel R. Haedr & Messaoud Mehafdi, 2017. "Accounting for Management Control in Large Libyan Companies," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 3(3), pages 279-304, July.
    16. Franco Cescon & Antonio Costantini & Luca Grassetti, 2019. "Strategic choices and strategic management accounting in large manufacturing firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 605-636, September.
    17. manuela S. Macinati & Marco G. Rizzo & Gianluca D'Agostino, 2014. "Partecipazione al processo di budget, accuratezza e utilit? delle informazioni di budget e performance. I risultati di un caso studi," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(92), pages 55-75.
    18. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    19. Macinati, Manuela S. & Rizzo, Marco G., 2014. "Budget goal commitment, clinical managers’ use of budget information and performance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 228-238.
    20. Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgetary goal; budgetary participation; budgetary evaluation; organization performance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:137:p:551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.