IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p350-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Assessment of Primorsky Krai Fishery Cluster Competitiveness Factors on the Basis of the Porter Model Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Yu. Vorozhbit*

    (Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education «Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service», 690014, Gogolya Str., 41, Vladivostok, Russia)

  • Natalia Yu. Titova

    (Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education «Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service», 690014, Gogolya Str., 41, Vladivostok, Russia)

  • Irina A. Kuzmicheva

    (Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education «Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service», 690014, Gogolya Str., 41, Vladivostok, Russia)

  • Olga V. Shnaider

    (Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education «Togliatti State University» Russia, 445020, Samara region, Tolyatti, Belorusskaya str)

Abstract

The goals of Russian Federation state program "The development of fishery complex" # 314 approved by RF Government Decree on April 15, 2014 # 314, include the transition to an innovative type of industrial production the provision of global competitiveness for goods and services produced by the Russian fishery complex. However, a number of problems that exist in the fishing industry of Russian Federation hinder the achievement of the set tasks: the deterioration of the basic production assets, the shortage of efficient cooling capacities for storage, a high level of raw and shadow exports, an unfavorable financial situation for industrial organizations, and an imperfect regulatory and legislative base. These circumstances necessitate the resumption of integration processes, the search for new interaction forms and methods in the fishing industry. The aim of the study, the results of which are reflected in the article, is a quantitative assessment of the factors which contribute to and impede the development of the fishing industry cluster in Primorsky Krai on the basis of the technique application previously developed by the authors. The theoretical basis of the study is the model of M. Porter’s national competitive advantages "rhombus", the critical analysis of which allowed the authors to propose the division of production factors into basic resource and infrastructural ones, which is especially important for the Russian business environment. This transformation served as the basis for the developed methodology, which includes an integral indicator of clustering factor development. The analysis of each of its components on the developed scale allows to identify the degree of cluster initiative implementation, as well as to determine the most effective support measures based on the competitive advantages of the fishing cluster. The determination of the competitive advantages of clusters is carried out by the method of focus group conduct among the experts, and their quantitative assessment is carried out using the questionnaire method, which gives the assessment of the implementation and importance. The developed methodology can be used to develop normative and strategic programs for the creation and the functioning of industrial clusters, the development of which corresponds to the implementation of import substitution processes and the transition of Russia to an innovative type of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Yu. Vorozhbit* & Natalia Yu. Titova & Irina A. Kuzmicheva & Olga V. Shnaider, 2018. "Quantitative Assessment of Primorsky Krai Fishery Cluster Competitiveness Factors on the Basis of the Porter Model Transformation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 350-357:5.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:350-357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.1.350.357.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang Moon, H. & Rugman, Alan M. & Verbeke, Alain, 1998. "A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 135-150, April.
    2. Puttawan Khuntonthong & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2013. "Analyzingthe Micro Economic Environment of Agricultural Product: Applying The," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(11), pages 813-822, November.
    3. Van Den Bosch, Frans A. J. & Van Prooijen, Arno A., 1992. "European management: An emerging competitive advantage of European nations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 445-448, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ki Han Song & Solsaem Choi & Ik Hyun Han, 2020. "Competitiveness Evaluation Methodology for Aviation Industry Sustainability Using Network DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Juan José García Ochoa & Juan de Dios León Lara & José Pablo Nuño de la Parra, 2017. "Propuesta de un modelo de medición de la competitividad mediante análisis factorial," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 775-791, Julio-Sep.
    3. Buitrago R., Ricardo E. & Barbosa Camargo, María Inés, 2021. "Institutions, institutional quality, and international competitiveness: Review and examination of future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 423-435.
    4. Thibeault, Al & Ryder, Michael & Tomomewo, Olusegun & Mann, Michael, 2023. "A review of competitive advantage theory applied to the global rare earth industry transition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    5. Arjun Bhardwaj & Joerg Dietz & Paul W. Beamish, 2007. "Host country cultural influences on foreign direct investment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 29-50, February.
    6. Bhisma K. Bhusal & James R. Wilson & Susana Franco, 2014. "Rethinking Policy Intervention for the Transition towards Competitive Trade-Led Green Growth," Working Papers 2014R02, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    7. Pragya Bhawsar & Utpal Chattopadhyay, 2015. "Competitiveness: Review, Reflections and Directions," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 665-679, August.
    8. Peña-Vinces, Jesús, 2009. "Comparative Analysis Of Competitiveness On The Peruvian And Chilean Economies From A Global View," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 14(27), pages 87-105.
    9. Hwy-Chang Moon & Yan-Ling Yu, 2004. "The competitiveness of China's telecommunications industry before and after China's accession to the WTO," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 79-98.
    10. Oh, Chang Hoon & Li, Jing, 2015. "Commentary: Alan Rugman and the theory of the regional multinationals," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 631-633.
    11. Segundo Castro-Gonzáles & Jairo A. Ayala-Godoy & Theany Calderón-Abreu, 2024. "Caribbean’s Global Competitiveness from a Systemic and Multifactorial Perspective for the Post-Covid-19 Period," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 14-23, June.
    12. Juan José García Ochoa & Juan de Dios León Lara & José Pablo Nuño de la Parra, 2017. "Proposal of a model to measure competitiveness through factor analysis," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 792-809, Julio-Sep.
    13. Chen Liu, 2017. "International Competitiveness and the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(4), pages 111-133.
    14. Sanjay Kumar, 2021. "Structural Changes and Competitiveness of the Steel Industry in India: Assessed by Productivity Growth post Economic Reforms," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 39-50, June.
    15. Tomasz Konewka & Joanna Bednarz & Tomasz Czuba, 2021. "Building a Competitive Advantage for Indonesia in the Development of the Regional EV Battery Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Ren Lu & Ruikan Zhang & Torger Reve, 2013. "Relations among Clusters in Six Chinese City Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1189-1209, August.
    17. Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Boosting China’s Film Production: An Assessment of the Subsidies for China’s ‘Mainstream Films’," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S2), pages 56-64, June.
    18. repec:bfv:journl:020 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:kap:iaecre:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:268-284 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Wang, Shih-Hsu, 2016. "An analytical model for benchmarking the development of national infrastructure items against those in similar countries," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 3-18.
    21. Rugman, Alan M. & Oh, Chang Hoon, 2008. "Korea's multinationals in a regional world," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 5-15, January.
    22. Hwy-Chang Moon, 2005. "Investment strategies by foreign automobile firms in China: A comparative study of Volkswagen, Honda, and Hyundai," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 151-171.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:350-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.