IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p1174-1179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Important Criteria for Staff Productivity in Relation to Malaysian Cultural Values: A Comparative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Norazrizal Aswad Abdul Rahman

    (School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Razamin Ramli*

    (School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

Malaysia is going towards being a developed country. One of the major benchmark for this is the capability of Malaysia to be a significant place for traders and investors. To achieve this, every company and corporate members in Malaysia has to play their roles to create a harmony environment to attract traders and investors. This can be done by focusing to improve the productivity of the company where this directly relates to staff’s productivity. There are a lot of physical attributes that can be used as a benchmark for productivity such as ability to gain profit and to initiate an innovation of a company, as well as their contribution to the society. Our research involves to two parts; 1. developing framework to identify important criteria from national cultural values involved and 2. to identify the key criteria involved quantitatively. Both parts are important, however, in this paper, we intend to focus on the framework development and the second part will be published separately in the future. For this purpose, some literature surveys and reviews is conducted and analysis is made. A comparative review between criteria is performed to identify which criteria are effective in driving staff productivity. To add on, a hierarchical model for finding the weights for measuring the importance is developed for future reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Norazrizal Aswad Abdul Rahman & Razamin Ramli*, 2018. "Identifying Important Criteria for Staff Productivity in Relation to Malaysian Cultural Values: A Comparative Review," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1174-1179:6.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1174-1179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.5.1174.1179.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Lee, 2015. "Migrant and ethnic diversity, cities and innovation: Firm effects or city effects?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 769-796.
    2. Scott Shane, 1995. "Uncertainty Avoidance and the Preference for Innovation Championing Roles," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 26(1), pages 47-68, March.
    3. Emre Yýldýrým & Yusuf Arslan & Merve Türkmen Barutçu, 2016. "The Role Of Uncertainty Avoidance And Indulgence As Cultural Dimensions On Online Shopping Expenditure," Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 42-51, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malgorzata Wachowska & Magdalena Homa, 2020. "The Role of Ethnic Diversity in Stimulating Innovation Processes: Comparative Analysis of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1157-1176.
    2. Sophie Hooge & Cédric Dalmasso & Frédéric Garcias, 2018. "Is Intrapreneurship Scalable? The Challenge Of Managing A Massive Internal Startup Call," Post-Print hal-01843048, HAL.
    3. Lingyan Liu & Minghua Lin & Ming Yu, 2023. "Relationship of internal institutions, knowledge sharing, and technological innovation in characteristic cultural enterprises: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 515-524, January.
    4. Usman Khalid & Mohammad Amin, 2023. "The impact of ethnic fractionalisation on labor productivity: Does firm size matter?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 2213-2249, October.
    5. Maja Szymura-Tyc & Michał Kucia, 2016. "Organizational Culture and Firms’ Internationalization, Innovativeness and Networking Behaviour: Hofstede Approach," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 4(4), pages 67-92.
    6. Lara Agostini & Federico Caviggioli & Francesco Galati & Barbara Bigliardi, 2020. "A social perspective of knowledge-based innovation: mobility and agglomeration. Introduction to the special section," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1309-1323, October.
    7. Kuen‐Hung Tsai & Chi‐Tsun Huang & Zi‐Hyo Chen, 2020. "Understanding variation in the relationship between environmental management practices and firm performance across studies: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 547-565, February.
    8. Shunying Zhao & Qiang Yang & Hohjin Im & Baojuan Ye & Yadi Zeng & Zhinan Chen & Lu Liu & Dawu Huang, 2022. "The impulsive online shopper: effects of COVID-19 burnout, uncertainty, self-control, and online shopping trust," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Neil Lee, 2020. "Hipsters vs. Geeks? Creative workers, STEM and innovation in US cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2021, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2020.
    10. Andrew A. Anabila & Eunyoung Whang, 2014. "An Empirical Description of Billionaires," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 112-112, May.
    11. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    12. Fu-Sheng Tsai & Gayle Baugh & Shih-Chieh Fang & Julia Lin, 2014. "Contingent contingency: Knowledge heterogeneity and new product development performance revisited," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 149-169, March.
    13. Na Li & Haiyan Lu & Yongxin Lv, 2022. "High-Speed Railway Facilities, Intercity Accessibility and Urban Innovation Level—Evidence from Cities in Three Chinese Megacity Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Daniel L. Bennett & Boris Nikolaev, 2021. "Individualism, pro-market institutions, and national innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 2085-2106, December.
    15. Tiessen, James H., 1997. "Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 367-384, September.
    16. Yutao Sun & Seamus Grimes, 2016. "The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 17-40, January.
    17. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    18. James Hayton & Gabriella Cacciotti, 2014. "Is there an entrepreneurial culture? A review of empirical research," Research Papers 0016, Enterprise Research Centre.
    19. Ceren Ozgen, 2021. "The economics of diversity: Innovation, productivity and the labour market," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1168-1216, September.
    20. Matteo Pedrini & Valentina Bramanti & Benedetto Cannatelli, 2016. "The impact of national culture and social capital on corporate social responsibility attitude among immigrants entrepreneurs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 759-787, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1174-1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.