IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p112-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Process Innovation between Organizational Capability and Software Project Success in Malaysian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • M. D. Rozaida*

    (Faculty of Industrial Management University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Mahanum Daim

    (Faculty of Industrial Management University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study used the partial least square (PLS) and structural equation modeling (SEM) tool to examine factors influencing the process innovation of the organization capability in public sectors. It also measures the impact of process innovation on the success of software project process. Statistical results confirm that coordination of expertise, communication plan and IT infrastructure reach impact on process innovation while process innovation in turn positively influences the success of software project success. The result, besides indicating the suitability of the PLS in statistical analysis, has also contributed to a better understanding of the success of the software project process. Findings are useful for IT Managers and practitioners to improve the success of software project in Malaysian public sectors. Limitation and suggestion for future research are also included.

Suggested Citation

  • M. D. Rozaida* & Mahanum Daim, 2018. "The Role of Process Innovation between Organizational Capability and Software Project Success in Malaysian Public Sector," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 112-124:4.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:112-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi4.16.112.124.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/4/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    2. Toke Reichstein & Ammon Salter, 2006. "Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(4), pages 653-682, August.
    3. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    4. Ram Subramanian & Jeffrey H. Toney & C. Jayachandran, 2011. "The evolution of research and development in the pharmaceutical industry: toward the open innovation model – can pharma reinvent itself?," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 63-74.
    5. Cockburn, Iain & Henderson, Rebecca, 1994. "Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 481-519, Fall.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    8. Risto Rajala & Mika Westerlund, 2008. "Capability perspective of business model innovation: analysis in the software industry," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 71-89.
    9. O. Homer Erekson & Raymond F. Gorman & Linsey Molloy, 2008. "Innovations in environmental performance: the importance of financial performance and management quality," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 331-353.
    10. Koellinger, Ph.D., 2008. "The Relationship between Technology, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence on E-Business in Europe," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-031-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Hashi, Iraj & Stojčić, Nebojša, 2013. "The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 353-366.
    12. repec:bla:jemstr:v:3:y:1994:i:3:p:481-519:a is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Scott L. Newbert, 2008. "Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 745-768, July.
    14. Samer Faraj & Lee Sproull, 2000. "Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(12), pages 1554-1568, December.
    15. Pradeep Waychal & R.P. Mohanty & Ajit Verma, 2011. "Determinants of innovation as a competence: an empirical study," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 192-211.
    16. Koellinger, Philipp, 2008. "The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance--Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1317-1328, September.
    17. Saoussen Boujelben & Hassouna Fedhila, 2010. "The effect of internal R&D efforts and external technology sourcing on achieving innovations in developing countries: the case of Tunisian manufacturing firms," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 338-357.
    18. Panagiotis Piperopoulos & Richard Scase, 2009. "Competitiveness of small and medium sized enterprises: towards a two dimensional model of innovation and business clusters," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(5), pages 479-499.
    19. Stefano Bresciani, 2009. "Innovation and creativity within firms: an empirical demonstration in the Piedmont area," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 427-443.
    20. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.
    21. Sofia Börjesson; & Maria Elmquist, 2012. "Aiming at innovation: a case study of innovation capabilities in the Swedish defence industry," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 188-201.
    22. Kalpana Chaturvedi & Joanna Chataway, 2006. "Strategic integration of knowledge in Indian pharmaceutical firms: creating competencies for innovation," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 27-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunis, Manal & Tarhini, Abbas & Kassar, Abdulnasser, 2018. "The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 344-356.
    2. Liao, Tung-Shan & Rice, John, 2010. "Innovation investments, market engagement and financial performance: A study among Australian manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 117-125, February.
    3. Omar Rabeea Mahdi & Islam A. Nassar, 2021. "The Business Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Strategic Leadership Capabilities and Knowledge Management Processes to Overcome COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    4. González-Fernández, Marcos & González-Velasco, Carmen, 2018. "Innovation and corporate performance in the Spanish regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 998-1021.
    5. Iyer, Karthik N.S. & Srivastava, Prashant & Srinivasan, Mahesh, 2019. "Performance implications of lean in supply chains: Exploring the role of learning orientation and relational resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 94-104.
    6. McGuinness, Martina & Demirbag, Mehmet & Bandara, Sasanka, 2013. "Towards a multi-perspective model of reverse knowledge transfer in multinational enterprises: A case study of Coats plc," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 179-195.
    7. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    8. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    9. Venugopal Ramachandran, 2011. "Strategic corporate social responsibility: a ‘dynamic capabilities’ perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 285-293, September.
    10. Wu Zhan & Roger (Rongxin) Chen, 2013. "Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 601-632, June.
    11. Fang, Yulin & Wade, Michael & Delios, Andrew & Beamish, Paul W., 2013. "An exploration of multinational enterprise knowledge resources and foreign subsidiary performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 30-38.
    12. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    13. Lobo, Sunila & Whyte, Jennifer, 2017. "Aligning and Reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 93-107.
    14. Ayuso, Silvia & Rodriguez, Miguel A. & Ricart, Joan E., 2006. "Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas. A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation," IESE Research Papers D/633, IESE Business School.
    15. Dedy Dewanto, 2022. "The characteristic of leader innovativeness, a case in Indonesian’s construction industry," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(8), pages 153-165, November.
    16. Demir, Robert & Wennberg, Karl & McKelvie, Alexander, 2016. "The Strategic Management of High-Growth Firms: A Review and Theoretical Conceptualization," Ratio Working Papers 273, The Ratio Institute.
    17. Dennys Eduardo Rossetto & Roberto Carlos Bernardes & Felipe Mendes Borini & Cristiane Chaves Gattaz, 2018. "Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1329-1363, June.
    18. Filipe M. Santos & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2005. "Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 491-508, October.
    19. Bindu Singh & M.K. Rao, 2016. "Examining the Effects of Intellectual Capital on Dynamic Capabilities in Emerging Economy Context: Knowledge Management Processes as a Mediator," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 110-128, May.
    20. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:112-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.