IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/jacarp/2023p172-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Rice Farming with Tabela and Tapin System in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, Jambi Province

Author

Listed:
  • Saidin Nainggolan

    (Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Indonesia)

  • Yanuar Fitri

    (Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Indonesia)

  • Ardhiyan Saputra

    (Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the comparison of the Tabela system rice farming with the Tapin system. The research was conducted in East Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi Province. The sample villages are Lagan Ulu Village and Simbur Naik Village. The sample size was 90 farmers, 45 farmers with the Tabela system of lowland rice farming, and 45 farmers with the Tapin rice farming system. Sampling with Simple Random Sampling Method. The data analysis method used descriptive analysis, and the production function of Cobb-Douglass Stochastic frontier, the measure of farmer behavior refers to the Kumbhakar and X-square test. The results of the study explain that the use of production inputs for the two rice farming patterns of the Tabela system and the Tapin system is not significantly different except for the use of seeds. Tabela rice farming system is more responsive to the use of production inputs. Farmers’ preferences for production risk are risk takers. The allocation of the use of urea fertilizer and pesticides is a risk averter, while the use of seeds, NPK fertilizer, and labor is a risk taker. Productivity, revenue, income, RC ratio, and profit were higher in the Tabela farming system than the Tapin system and were significantly different.How to Cite: Saidin Nainggolan, Yanuar Fitri, Ardhiyan Saputra, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Rice Farming with Tabela and Tapin System in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, Jambi Province." Journal of Agriculture and Crops, vol. 9, pp. 172-177.

Suggested Citation

  • Saidin Nainggolan & Yanuar Fitri & Ardhiyan Saputra, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Rice Farming with Tabela and Tapin System in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, Jambi Province," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 9(2), pages 172-177, 04-2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2023:p:172-177
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/jac.92.172.177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jac9(2)172-177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/14/archive/04-2023/2/9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32861/jac.92.172.177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2002. "Specification and Estimation of Production Risk, Risk Preferences and Technical Efficiency," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(1), pages 8-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Bozzola & Robert Finger, 2021. "Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(3), pages 477-501.
    2. Muktar Geleto & Mohammed Essa, 2022. "Analysis of Red Pepper Production Risk Adjusted Technical Efficiency: The Case Of Lanfuro District In Siltie Zone, Southern Ethiopia," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 30-58, May.
    3. Muhammad Rizwan & Ping Qing & Abdul Saboor & Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Adnan Nazir, 2020. "Production Risk and Competency among Categorized Rice Peasants: Cross-Sectional Evidence from an Emerging Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Javad Torkamani & Shahrokh Shajari, 2008. "Adoption of New Irrigation Technology Under Production Risk," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(2), pages 229-237, February.
    5. Bouali Guesmi & Teresa Serra & Allen Featherstone, 2015. "Technical efficiency of Kansas arable crop farms: a local maximum likelihood approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 46(6), pages 703-713, November.
    6. Muhamad Zahid Muhamad & Mad Nasir Shamsudin & Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman & Nolila Mohd Nawi & Jamaliah Laham, 2022. "Investigating Yield Variability and Technical Efficiency of Smallholders Pineapple Production in Johor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Zhihai Yang & Amin W. Mugera & Fan Zhang, 2016. "Investigating Yield Variability and Inefficiency in Rice Production: A Case Study in Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Ali D. Cagdas & Scott R. Jeffrey & Elwin G. Smith & Peter C. Boxall, 2016. "Environmental Stewardship and Technical Efficiency in Canadian Prairie Canola Production," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 455-477, September.
    9. Kimhi, Ayai & Lerman, Zvi (ed.), 2015. "Agricultural transition in post-soviet Europe and Central Asia after 25 years: International workshop in honor of Professor Zvi Lerman," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 79, number 79.
    10. Shankar, Sriram, 2012. "Production economics in the presence of risk," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Huettel, Silke & Narayana, Rashmi & Odening, Martin, 2011. "Measuring dynamic efficiency under uncertainty," Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers 129062, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Gataulina, Ekaterina & Hockmann, Heinrich & Strokov, Anton, 2014. "Production Risk, Technology and Market Access in Different Organisational Forms: Evidence from Tatarstan and Oryol," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 53(4), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Moawia Alghalith, 2006. "Joint production and price uncertainty: hypothesis tests," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 49(3), pages 265-274.
    14. Ashok K. Mishra & Mike G. Tsionas, 2020. "A Minimax Regret Approach to Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 698-718, September.
    15. Basanta R. Dhungana & Peter L. Nuthall & Gilbert V. Nartea, 2004. "Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 347-369, June.
    16. Nigist Haile, Haile & Oskam, A. & Tassew, Woldehanna & Peerlings, J., 2009. "Decision-Making under Risk: Evidence from Northern Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 132-132, August.
    17. Tsionas, Mike G., 2016. "Parameters measuring bank risk and their estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 291-304.
    18. Fleming, Euan M. & Farrell, Terence C. & Villano, Renato A. & Fleming, Pauline, 2006. "Is farm benchmarking the new acceptable face of comparative analysis?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 14.
    19. Inmaculada Rodríguez-Puerta & Alberto Álvarez-López, 2016. "Optimal allocation of a fixed production under price uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 121-142, February.
    20. Inmaculada Rodríguez-Puerta & Alberto A. Álvarez-López, 2022. "A model for the optimal selection of lenders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1269-1284, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2023:p:172-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=14&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.