IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arb/journl/y2024i1p102-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence In Helping People With Disabilities: Opportunities And Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Radka Nacheva

    (University of Economics - Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Maciej Czaplewski

    (Institute of Spatial Management and Socio-Economic Geography, University of Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing teaching, learning, and administrative processes in higher education. AI-driven personalized learning platforms, virtual tutors, content creation tools, chatbots, and adaptive learning platforms offer tailored educational experiences, fostering student engagement and autonomy. These tools promote active learning, enhance instructional content, and provide round-the-clock assistance. However, the integration raises ethical concerns like data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the displacement of traditional teaching roles. Therefore, ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks are crucial for responsible AI implementation in higher education settings. The application of AI holds the potential to change the teaching and learning landscape, foster innovation, and create a more inclusive and personalized educational experience. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is to analyse commonly used AI-powered tools in higher education which could be used to better the digital accessibility for people with disabilities. The objectives of this paper are related to the study of the features of Intelligent Tutoring Systems and AI-powered virtual tutors, as well as AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants; to conduct a comparative analysis of AI chatbots to track the differences in their features that are important to better the accessibility. The research hypothesizes that texts generated with AI-powered tools need to improve readability. The accessibility or, more specifically, the readability of generated texts was checked with the OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot chatbots. Results are compared based on key readability metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Radka Nacheva & Maciej Czaplewski, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence In Helping People With Disabilities: Opportunities And Challenges," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 1, pages 102-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2024:i:1:p:102-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.cspace-ngo.com/arb/Issues/2024/1/6-Nacheva-Czaplewski-2024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Hughes, Laurie & Ismagilova, Elvira & Aarts, Gert & Coombs, Crispin & Crick, Tom & Duan, Yanqing & Dwivedi, Rohita & Edwards, John & Eirug, Aled & Galanos, Vassilis & Ilavarasan, , 2021. "Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Choi, Jay Pil & Jeon, Doh-Shin & Kim, Byung-Cheol, 2019. "Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 113-124.
    3. Liliya Mileva & Pavel Petrov & Plamen Yankov & Julian Vasilev & Stefka Petrova, 2021. "Prototype model for big data predictive analysis in logistics area with Apache Kudu," Economics and computer science, Publishing house "Knowledge and business" Varna, issue 1, pages 20-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goonj Mohan, 2024. "The Data Economy and Polarization on Social Media," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2024/462, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Sundberg, Leif & Holmström, Jonny, 2023. "Democratizing artificial intelligence: How no-code AI can leverage machine learning operations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 777-788.
    3. Jorge Padilla, 2020. "Big Tech “banks”, financial stability and regulation," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    4. Eilat, Ran & Eliaz, Kfir & Mu, Xiaosheng, 2021. "Bayesian privacy," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(4), November.
    5. Sergio Mariotti, 2022. "The economics–engineering nexus: response to the commentaries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Flavio Pino, 2022. "The microeconomics of data – a survey," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 635-665, September.
    7. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2024. "Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2553-2595, August.
    8. Radka Nacheva & Jose Paulo da Costa, 2024. "Digital Accessibility Needs for People with Disabilities in Higher Education," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 1, pages 88-101.
    9. Sarit Markovich & Yaron Yehezkel, 2021. "“For the public benefit”: who should control our data?," Working Papers 21-08, NET Institute.
    10. Aridor, Guy & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & Levy, Ro'ee & Song, Lena, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 18821, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Chenfeng Yan & Quan Chen & Xinyue Zhou & Xin Dai & Zhilin Yang, 2024. "When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 841-859, April.
    12. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti & Tan Gan, 2022. "The economics of social data," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 263-296, June.
    13. Smolin, Alex & Ichihashi, Shota, 2022. "Data Collection by an Informed Seller," TSE Working Papers 22-1330, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    14. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Yiquan Gu & Leonardo Madio & Carlo Reggiani, 2022. "Data brokers co-opetition [The impact of big data on firm performance: an empirical investigation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 820-839.
    16. Jean-Marc Zogheib & Marc Bourreau, 2021. "Privacy, Competition, and Multi-Homing," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-15, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    17. John Kwoka & Tommaso Valletti, 2021. "Unscrambling the eggs: breaking up consummated mergers and dominant firms [Too much data: prices and inefficiencies in data markets]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1286-1306.
    18. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    19. Li, Sixian & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Duan, Jinyun, 2023. "Why do we prefer humans to artificial intelligence in telemarketing? A mind perception explanation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Yosuke Uno & Akira Sonoda & Masaki Bessho, 2021. "The Economics of Privacy: A Primer Especially for Policymakers," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 21-E-11, Bank of Japan.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence; higher education; learning experiences; text readability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2024:i:1:p:102-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rositsa Zarkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.