IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijhmss/2018p9-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual Behavior, Risk Perception and Motivations for Sexual Risk Taking among Foreign Gay Tourists in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Rabhas Silpsrikul∗

    (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand)

  • Emmy Thounghirunchote

    (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand)

  • Pornchanok Chaorattana

    (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand)

Abstract

Thailand is portrayed globally as a haven for gay tourism. Tourism Authority of Thailand has been actively promoting the image of Thailand as a gay paradise. It is estimated that the country has witnessed a growing number of foreign gay tourists. This study aims to investigate sexual behaviour, risk perceptions and motivations for sexual risk taking of foreign gay tourists while traveling in Thailand on their vacation. A questionnaire consisting of four parts was designed. The first part of the questionnaire was to gather the information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. In the second part, the respondents were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale with respect to the degree of risks associated with various specific sexual activities and to indicate whether they had or had not experienced a particular sexual activity while in Thailand. The third part of the questionnaire employed the 5-point Likert motivation scale for sexual-risk taking adopted from Berdychevsky and Gibson (2015). The fourth part of the questionnaire consisted of questions seeking to determine the awareness of the availability of places where tourists could have HIV counseling or HIV tests and the awareness of PrEP and PEP, the HIV prevention strategies. A questionnaire survey technique was used. The data were collected via gay smart phone mobile applications and at the establishments such as gay pubs or clubs, gay saunas and massage spas. A total number of 197 foreign gay tourists participated in the survey. Descriptive statistics such as mean score and standard deviation were used to identify the degree of perceived risks associated with various specific sexual activities and the degree of motivations for sexual risk-taking. Independent sample t-tests were conducted to test the difference perceptions between the gay tourists with and without actual experience with particular actual sexual activities. The study results provided the empirical evidence for understanding risks in tourism among foreign gay tourists in Thailand. Out of the total 24 sex-related activities, no activities were perceived as highest risk. 10 activities were perceived as high risk with the mean scores in the range between 3.41 to 4.20. The respondents referred to having anal sex with and unsteady/casual partner without condom as the most risky (mean score = 3.93, SD = 1.260). For the motivation results, the motivational capacity of the Fun and Less Inhibition dimension is higher than Anonymous Experimentation factor and Safe Thrills and Empowerment dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabhas Silpsrikul∗ & Emmy Thounghirunchote & Pornchanok Chaorattana, 2018. "Sexual Behavior, Risk Perception and Motivations for Sexual Risk Taking among Foreign Gay Tourists in Thailand," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 4(1), pages 9-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijhmss:2018:p:9-17
    DOI: 10.20469/ijhms.40002-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/medical-sciences-vol4issue1-article-2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ijhms.40002-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijhms.40002-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per E. Gustafsod, 1998. "Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological erspectives," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 805-811, December.
    2. Wichitra Kusoom, 2016. "Health behaviors and health risk behaviors among vocational students: Case study of vocational college in Nakornratchasima province Thailand," Journal of Advances in Health and Medical Sciences, Balachandar S. Sayapathi, vol. 2(3), pages 102-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ilia Kunchulia & Giorgi Ghambashidze & Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2018. "Farmers’ Perception of Water Quality and Risks in the Mashavera River Basin, Georgia: Analyzing the Vulnerability of the Social-Ecological System through Community Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Alexandra Savelkaeva & Valentina Poliakova & Konstantin Fursov, 2015. "Structure of Social Attitudes to Science and Technology: National and Individual Determinants," HSE Working papers WP BRP 52/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Kiyoshi Nosu, 2017. "Analysis of behavior of adults with Aphasia in a community," Journal of Advances in Health and Medical Sciences, Balachandar S. Sayapathi, vol. 3(2), pages 75-87.
    4. Michele Borgia & Eugenia Nissi & Maura La Torre & Guido Ortolani, 2022. "The Relationship between Demographics and Knowledge Risk Perception of High School Teachers: Training as a Mediator," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Bruce, Marta M. & Ulrich, Connie M. & Webster, Jessica & Richmond, Therese S., 2022. "Injured black men's perceptions of the recovery environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Jaehwuen Jung & Hyungsoo Lim & Dongwon Lee & Chul Kim, 2022. "The Secret to Finding a Match: A Field Experiment on Choice Capacity Design in an Online Dating Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1248-1263, December.
    7. David Etkin & Jelena Ivanova & Susan MacGregor & Tali Serota, 2014. "Risk Perception and Belief in Guardian Spirits," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
    8. Georgios Voucharas & Dimitrios Xefteris, 2018. "Women's Political Power and Environmental Outcomes," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 07-2018, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    9. Thomas Davenport & Abhijit Guha & Dhruv Grewal & Timna Bressgott, 2020. "How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 24-42, January.
    10. Matthew R. Hallowell & Dillon Alexander & John A. Gambatese, 2017. "Energy-based safety risk assessment: does magnitude and intensity of energy predict injury severity?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1-2), pages 64-77, February.
    11. Mapa Thilakarathna, 2017. "Issues encountered in community health in Sri Lanka with special reference to Polpithigama rural village in North-Western province," Journal of Advances in Health and Medical Sciences, Balachandar S. Sayapathi, vol. 3(3), pages 96-105.
    12. Aitzaz Ahsan Alias Sarang & Nicolas Aubert & Xavier Hollandts, 2021. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Cash Holdings," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 42(1), pages 7-49.
    13. Shengnan Wu & Yu Lei & Wen Jin, 2022. "An Interdisciplinary Approach to Quantify the Human Disaster Risk Perception and Its Influence on the Population at Risk: A Case Study of Longchi Town, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Philip Nyblom & Gaute Wangen & Vasileios Gkioulos, 2020. "Risk Perceptions on Social Media Use in Norway," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-40, November.
    15. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-450 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mellacher, Patrick, 2023. "The impact of corona populism: Empirical evidence from Austria and theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 113-140.
    17. Abanoub Riad & Anton Drobov & Martin Krobot & Natália Antalová & Muhammad Abdullatif Alkasaby & Aleš Peřina & Michal Koščík, 2022. "Mental Health Burden of the Russian–Ukrainian War 2022 (RUW-22): Anxiety and Depression Levels among Young Adults in Central Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Yanjing Gao & Lijun Chen, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 Risk Perception on Residents’ Behavioural Intention towards Forest Therapy Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Yanbo Zhang & Yibao Wang & Ahmad Bayiz Ahmad & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Wen Qing, 2021. "How Do Individual-Level Characteristics Influence Cross-Domain Risk Perceptions Among Chinese Urban Residents?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    20. Vicki S. Freimuth & Amelia Jamison & Gregory Hancock & Donald Musa & Karen Hilyard & Sandra Crouse Quinn, 2017. "The Role of Risk Perception in Flu Vaccine Behavior among African‐American and White Adults in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(11), pages 2150-2163, November.
    21. Antoine J.‐P. Tixier & Matthew R. Hallowell & Balaji Rajagopalan, 2017. "Construction Safety Risk Modeling and Simulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1917-1935, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sexual behavior; risk; gay; tourist;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijhmss:2018:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohammad A. H. Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://kkgpublications.com/medical-sciences/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.