IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijapss/2019p20-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Assessment of Hog Raising in Different Types of Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Eunice Lagrimas Lluz

    (Chair, Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics Department, College of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Natural Resources, University of Eastern Philippines, Northern Samar, Philippines)

Abstract

The growth response and economic profitability of country pigs raised in different housing was evaluated using the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with a total of nine weanlings randomly distributed into three treatments. The country pigs were reared in cemented flooring (T1), slatted wood elevated floor (T2) and compacted soil with rice hull (T3) for ninety days (90). The animals were obtained from local backyard hog raisers and they were subject to feeding trials for ninety days (90). Feeds were mixed based on the weekly consumption of the experimental animals. The Golden kuhol was crushed and sundried for 2 to 3 days. The kangkong stalks were chopped approximately 2-3 centimeters in length. These were mixed well with ground super corn, "Ground 7 kinds Concentrates", corn grits, rice bran, muscovado sugar, copra meal and ordinary salt. Two to three liters of water were added until the feed was wet before feeding. The country pigs were fed twice a day at six o’clock in the morning and three o’clock in the afternoon at the compounded ration of 800 grams per hog or 2.4 kgs per day per pen. Feeds were increased per week based on the need of the animals through out the study. Vitamins supplementation was given as needed to the animals. Clean drinking water was made available at all times. Cleaning of pens and animals was done everyday, and disinfection of pens was applied every after two weeks. Rice hull used as floor bedding materials was put up and increased every one week from the start of the study until its completion. The study revealed that there is a difference on the economic profitability using compacted soil with the rice hull (T3) with the highest Return on Investment rate (ROI) of 29% compared to slatted wood elevated floor (T2) with ROI of 26% and ground cemented flooring (T1) with ROI of 25%. However no significant difference was noted on the different treatments on the growth performance of the pigs. Raising country pigs in a compacted soil with rice hull as bedding materials rather than elevated and cemented flooring is more profitable and economical.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunice Lagrimas Lluz, 2019. "Economic Assessment of Hog Raising in Different Types of Housing," International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Dr K.Vivehananthan, vol. 5(1), pages 20-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijapss:2019:p:20-27
    DOI: 10.20469/ijaps.5.50003-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/applied-sciences-v5-issue1-article3/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ijaps.5.50003-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijaps.5.50003-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomassen, M.A. & Dolman, M.A. & van Calker, K.J. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2009. "Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2278-2284, June.
    2. Bendjima Omar & Larguo Khamsa, 2017. "The Impact of Cultural Values on the Performance of Small and Medium-Enterprises (Case Study of Managers in Bechar, Algeria)," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 3(6), pages 217-228.
    3. Hertz Tom & Jayasundera Tamara & Piraino Patrizio & Selcuk Sibel & Smith Nicole & Verashchagina Alina, 2008. "The Inheritance of Educational Inequality: International Comparisons and Fifty-Year Trends," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-48, January.
    4. Budhi Refa Anjani & Imam Baihaqi, 2018. "Comparative analysis of financial Production Sharing Contract (PSC) cost recovery with PSC gross split: Case study in one of the contractor SKK Migas," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 4(2), pages 65-80.
    5. Hamide Ozyurek & Yakup Uluturk, 2016. "Flexible budgeting under time-driven activity based cost as a tool in management accounting: Application in educational institution," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(2), pages 64-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Sisyuk, 2018. "Training, knowledge, competence, performance: what is the relationship?," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 4(6), pages 297-312.
    2. Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues, 2021. "Direct and indirect energy consumption in farming: Impacts from fertilizer use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Emanuela Struffolino & Michele Raitano, 2020. "Early-Career Complexity Before and After Labour-Market Deregulation in Italy: Heterogeneity by Gender and Socio-economic Status Across Cohorts," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 231-257, August.
    4. Sander Kunst & Theresa Kuhn & Herman G van de Werfhorst, 2023. "As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? The role of parental versus own education for openness towards globalisation," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 264-285, June.
    5. Pirmin Fessler & Peter Mooslechner & Martin Schürz, 2012. "Intergenerational transmission of educational attainment in Austria," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 65-86, February.
    6. Mattéo Godin & Jean Hindriks, 2018. "An international comparison of school systems based on social mobility," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 499, pages 61-78.
    7. Meng, Xin & Zhao, Guochang, 2021. "The long shadow of a large scale education interruption: The intergenerational effect," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Bernt Bratsberg & Simen Markussen & Oddbjørn Raaum & Knut Røed & Ole Røgeberg, 2023. "Trends in Assortative Mating and Offspring Outcomes," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(651), pages 928-950.
    9. Fochesato, Mattia & Bowles, Samuel, 2015. "Nordic exceptionalism? Social democratic egalitarianism in world-historic perspective," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 30-44.
    10. Javier Torres & Fiorella Parra & Jorge Rubio, 2018. "Transmisión educativa intergeneracional en el Perú: un cálculo para las generaciones nacidas entre 1950-1989," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, vol. 41(81), pages 101-124.
    11. Andrés Erosa & Tatyana Koreshkova & Diego Restuccia, 2010. "How Important Is Human Capital? A Quantitative Theory Assessment of World Income Inequality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 77(4), pages 1421-1449.
    12. Amin, Vikesh & Lundborg, Petter & Rooth, Dan-Olof, 2015. "The intergenerational transmission of schooling: Are mothers really less important than fathers?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 100-117.
    13. Julia Bredtmann & Nina Smith, 2018. "Inequalities in Educational Outcomes: How Important Is the Family?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 80(6), pages 1117-1144, December.
    14. Veronika Fenyves & Tibor Tarnóczi & Zoltán Bács & Dóra Kerezsi & Péter Bajnai & Mihály Szoboszlai, 2022. "Financial efficiency analysis of Hungarian agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 413-426.
    15. Francesco Galioto & Chiara Paffarini & Massimo Chiorri & Biancamaria Torquati & Lucio Cecchini, 2017. "Economic, Environmental, and Animal Welfare Performance on Livestock Farms: Conceptual Model and Application to Some Case Studies in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Emran, M. Shahe & Shilpi, Forhad, 2017. "Estimating Intergenerational Mobility with Incomplete Data: Coresidency and Truncation Bias in Rank-Based Relative and Absolute Mobility Measures," MPRA Paper 80724, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Oulu, Martin, 2015. "The unequal exchange of Dutch cheese and Kenyan roses: Introducing and testing an LCA-based methodology for estimating ecologically unequal exchange," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 372-383.
    18. Thomas Baudin & David de la Croix & Paula E. Gobbi, 2015. "Fertility and Childlessness in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(6), pages 1852-1882, June.
    19. Mevlude Akbulut-Yuksel & Belgi Turan, 2013. "Left behind: intergenerational transmission of human capital in the midst of HIV/AIDS," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 1523-1547, October.
    20. Pastore, Francesco, 2017. "Why So Slow? The School-to-Work Transition in Italy," IZA Discussion Papers 10767, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijapss:2019:p:20-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr K.Vivehananthan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://kkgpublications.com/applied-sciences/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.