IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aml/intbrm/v4y2013i4p75-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing a Tailor-made Performance Management System Supported by Knowledge Elicitation Tools and Dynamic Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Ossadnik

    (University of Osnabrueck, Germany)

  • Ralf H. Kaspar

    (University of Osnabrueck, Germany)

  • Stefanie Schinke

    (University of Osnabrueck, Germany)

Abstract

For constructing a causality-based performance management system (PMS), the consideration of expert knowledge is indispensable. As this knowledge is usually not transparent or explicitly available, the process of tacit knowledge elicitation (TKE) plays an important role for a tailor-made construction of PMS, as does its operationalization in the form of a company-specific scorecard or a dynamic model. Owing to this importance, this paper develops a holistic, step by step approach for constructing and operationalizing an effective PMS using TKE such as interview techniques, as well as System Dynamics (SD) and the interaction of organization’s personnel (experts) and Management Accounting (MA). The framework is structured by a phase model in matrix form, whereby the three main steps data generation, assessment and construction are further divided by functional responsibilities on company and MA levels. For demonstration purposes, the framework is subsequently applied to a case study within the automotive industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Ossadnik & Ralf H. Kaspar & Stefanie Schinke, 2013. "Constructing a Tailor-made Performance Management System Supported by Knowledge Elicitation Tools and Dynamic Modeling," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 4(4), pages 75-98, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aml:intbrm:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:75-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript/Journals/IJBRM/Volume4/Issue4/IJBRM-151.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.cscjournals.org/library/manuscriptinfo.php?mc=IJBRM-151
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Erratum to "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research" [Accounting Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 169-249]," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 815-815.
    2. Lebas, Michel J., 1995. "Performance measurement and performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 23-35, October.
    3. Anne Wyatt, 2008. "What financial and non‐financial information on intangibles is value‐relevant? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 217-256.
    4. Tegarden, David P. & Sheetz, Steven D., 2003. "Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 113-125, April.
    5. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    6. Geisler, Eliezer, 2007. "The metrics of knowledge: Mechanisms for preserving the value of managerial knowledge," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 467-477.
    7. I M Newsome, 2008. "Using system dynamics to model the impact of policing activity on performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 164-170, February.
    8. Marianna Sigala & Kalotina Chalkiti, 2007. "Improving performance through tacit knowledge externalisation and utilisation," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(5/6), pages 456-483, June.
    9. Véronique Ambrosini & Cliff Bowman, 2001. "Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 811-829, September.
    10. Patrick Buckley, 2012. "Using Information Aggregation Markets for Decision Support," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(3), pages 133-143, June.
    11. H A Akkermans & K E van Oorschot, 2005. "Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 931-941, August.
    12. Neda Jalaliyoon & Hamed Taherdoost & Mazdak Zamani, 2011. "Utilizing the BSC and EFQM as a Combination Framework; Scrutinizing the Possibility by TOPSIS Method," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 1(3), pages 169-182, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellen Haustein & Robert Luther & Peter Schuster, 2014. "Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 343-382, February.
    2. Prabhu Sivabalan & Peter Booth & Teemu Malmi & David A. Brown, 2009. "An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 849-871, December.
    3. David Marginson & Laurie McAulay & Melvin Roush & Tony Van Zijl, 2010. "Performance measures and short‐termism: An exploratory study," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 353-370.
    4. Rowe, Casey & Birnberg, Jacob G. & Shields, Michael D., 2008. "Effects of organizational process change on responsibility accounting and managers' revelations of private knowledge," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 164-198.
    5. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Joan Luft & Michael Shields, 2002. "Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 795-803.
    7. Caglio, Ariela & Ditillo, Angelo, 2008. "A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 865-898.
    8. Maik Hamann & Thomas Günther, 2009. "Was ist ein Planungssystem? – Ein Metamodell zur Beschreibung von Planungssystemen als Basis für die empirische Planungsforschung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 143-173, October.
    9. Frans Prenkert, 2012. "Business Network Simulation: Combining Research Cases and Agent-Based Models in a Robust Methodology," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 82-92, November.
    10. James T. Mackey & F. Johnny Deng, 2016. "Examining the Role of Management Control Systems in the Creation of an Innovative Culture," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Malcolm Anderson, 2004. "Accounting history publications 2003," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 209-215.
    12. Bouwens, J.F.M.G. & van Lent, L.A.G.M., 2003. "Effort and Selection Effects of Incentive Contracts," Discussion Paper 2003-130, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. O'Connor, Neale G. & Deng, Johnny & Luo, Yadong, 2006. "Political constraints, organization design and performance measurement in China's state-owned enterprises," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 157-177, February.
    14. Job Borrenbergs & Rui Vieira & Georgios Georgakopoulos, 2017. "Remuneration Committees’ Gender Composition as a Determinant of Executive Board Compensation Structure," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, February.
    15. Tobias Johansson, 2022. "Do Evaluative Pressures and Group Identification Cultivate Competitive Orientations and Cynical Attitudes Among Academics?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 761-780, April.
    16. Arnold, Markus C. & Gillenkirch, Robert M., 2015. "Using negotiated budgets for planning and performance evaluation: An experimental study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-16.
    17. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    18. Heggen, Campbell, 2019. "The role of value systems in translating environmental planning into performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 130-147.
    19. Gerdin, Jonas & Greve, Jan, 2008. "The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 995-1009.
    20. Saymon Ricardo Oliveira Sousa & Wesley Vieira Silva & Claudimar Pereira Veiga & Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini, 2020. "Theoretical background of innovation in services in small and medium-sized enterprises: literature mapping," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cause-and-effect Relationships; Expert Knowledge; Performance Management; Tacit Knowledge; Causal Maps; Strategy Maps; System Dynamics; Interview Techniques; Case Study.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aml:intbrm:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:75-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nabeel Tahir (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.