IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v17y2018i2p291-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on Pitching Research: Do It Your Own Way

Author

Listed:
  • Asmita Manchha

    (University of Queensland, Australia)

Abstract

This pitch letter provides a reflection of a student’s personal experience of completing Faff (2017)’s reverse engineered pitch. The reflection describes Faff’s pitching template as a learning and self-developmental tool. As a learning tool, the pitching template focuses on building technical skills as a researcher. However, as a self-developmental tool, the pitching template creates opportunities for discovering who the pitcher is and aspires to be as a researcher. The underlying message of this reflection depicts that no one pitch is the same. Hence, pitching research enables the pitcher to ‘do it their own way’, from their idiosyncratic perspective of the research process.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmita Manchha, 2018. "Reflections on Pitching Research: Do It Your Own Way," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 291-300, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:291-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/17_2_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Faff & Tom Smith, 2015. "A simple template for pitching research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 311-336, June.
    2. Ann Wallin & Amanda Spry, 2016. "The Role of Corporate Versus Product Brand Dominance in Brand Portfolio Overlap: A Pitch," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 434-439, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert W. Faff, 2019. "Adopting a Structured Abstract Design to More Effectively Catch Reader Attention: An Application of the Pitching Research® Framework," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-13.
    2. Yitong Li, 2022. "Pitching Research for Research-Enabled Students: Reflections on My Experience as A “Test Pilot†Of the Inspir2es “Internship†Initiative," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 631-654, December.
    3. Vu Nguyen Manh Hoai, 2022. "How Can the Pitching Research Framework Assist in Summarizing and Presenting Research Ideas? A Research Pitching Competition Story," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 655-665, December.
    4. Binh Bui, 2021. "A critical examination of the use of research templates in accounting and finance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2671-2696, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binh Bui, 2021. "A critical examination of the use of research templates in accounting and finance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2671-2696, June.
    2. Robert W. Faff, 2019. "Adopting a Structured Abstract Design to More Effectively Catch Reader Attention: An Application of the Pitching Research® Framework," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-13.
    3. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    4. Chai, Daniel & Ali, Searat & Brosnan, Mark & Hasso, Tim, 2024. "Understanding researchers' perceptions and experiences in finance research replication studies: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Robert W. Faff & Sebastian Kernbach, 2021. "A visualisation approach for pitching research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5177-5197, December.
    6. Southam, Colette & Jiang, Guoliang (Frank) & Todd, James & Tonkin, Isaac, 2024. "Impact of post-IPO investments on the long-term financial market performance of Japanese IPOs: A preregistered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2017. "Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 275-304.
    8. Bai, Xiao & Zhao, Wenyao & Tian, Geran, 2024. "ESG certification, green innovation, and firm value: A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance's ESG ratings: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2016. "Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 66-76.
    10. Gordon Menzies & Peter Dixon & Maureen Rimmer, 2016. "In Praise of (Some) Red Tape: A New Approach to Regulation," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(299), pages 631-647, December.
    11. Chang, Millicent & Wee, Marvin, 2016. "The effect of voluntary versus mandatory adoption of trading policies on the returns to insider trades," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 76-87.
    12. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2018. "Does corporate governance quality affect default risk? The role of growth opportunities and stock liquidity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 422-448.
    13. Nguyen, Quynh & Kim, Maria H. & Ali, Searat, 2024. "Corporate governance and earnings management: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 775-801.
    14. Victoria J. Clout, 2017. "Corporate boards, monitoring and securities class actions: a pitch," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 242-248, September.
    15. Ding, Jie & Huang, Jinbo & Ding, Ashley & Guo, Shijun & Wang, Tianjiao, 2024. "The peer effects of corporate social responsibility in China: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Elizabeth Yong & Kun Hing Yong, 2023. "A reverse-engineered pitch on defensive versus evidence-based medical technology: Liability risk and electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk births," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 746-754, December.
    17. Sumit Lodhia, 2019. "What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 309-329, March.
    18. Robert W. Faff & Sumit Lodhia, 2021. "… More on the use of research templates," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5003-5023, December.
    19. Dang, Man & Henry, Darren, 2016. "Partial-control versus full-control acquisitions: Does target corporate governance matter? Evidence from eight East and Southeast Asian countries," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 251-265.
    20. Duncan, Keith & Gepp, Adrian & Craig, Justin & O'Neill, Helen, 2023. "Research ideas matter: Guidance for research students and early career researchers," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pitching research; Research Process; Learning; Learning tool; Self-developmental tool;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:291-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.