IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v2y2023i25p5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ï»¿Theoretical And Statistical Arguments Of The Differentiated Effect Of The Common Agricultural Policy In The Eu Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Remus Ionut ILIES

    (University of Oradea)

  • Sorin Nicolae BORLEA

    (University of Oradea)

  • Isabella LUCUÈš CAPRAÅž

    (BabeÅŸ-Bolyai University)

Abstract

Agriculture and rural areas have special economic specificities, which determine their study not as an economic sector, but rather as geographical entities. Productivity cannot be homogeneously distributed territorially because the quality of the land varies considerably. Consequently, agriculture and rural areas cannot be left only to competitive markets but must be supported and financed. In the EU, there has been a common policy of support for several decades, based on two financing pillars. The objectives of this policy were initially based mostly on supporting Agricultural productivity, but more recently goals related to the environment and the complex development of rural areas have been added. Although the funding was very high, there is still the question of the efficiency and equity of this common policy. Our analysis explains the differentiated effects on the EU countries through theoretical arguments and statistical data on the EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Remus Ionut ILIES & Sorin Nicolae BORLEA & Isabella LUCUÈš CAPRAÅž, 2023. "Ï»¿Theoretical And Statistical Arguments Of The Differentiated Effect Of The Common Agricultural Policy In The Eu Countries," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(25), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2023:i:25:p:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/2520232/05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Common Agricultural Policy; agricultural productivity; EU countries; rural development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2023:i:25:p:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.