IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v19y2020i3p329-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Sewage Sludge Alternatives Towards Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • A.V. Kiselev
  • E.R. Magaril
  • I.S. Glushankova
  • L.V. Rudakova

Abstract

The article describes ways to solve the urgent issue of the pollution of water sources due to the imperfection of the technical and technological equipment of municipal wastewater treatment plants. The subject matter is considered from the perspective of the transition to the circular economy. One of the key elements of a sustainable development strategy in a circular economy is the development and implementation of policies for the modernization of municipal wastewater treatment plants in order to reduce the negative impact on the environment. The goal of this research is to create a holistic assessment system of various technological solutions for the treatment of sewage sludge using life cycle assessment and material flow analysis methods for the transition towards the circular economy. The hypothesis of the present study assumes a specific set of technologies based on the waste-to-energy principle, in which it is possible to achieve net zero energy consumption in a wastewater treatment plant. A methodological framework for assessing the complete technological cycle of sewage sludge treatment and disposal using life cycle analysis and material flow analysis tools is proposed. The results are visualized using the Sankey chart. The authors test the proposed method according to data presented from real treatment facilities that operate in Ekaterinburg and Perm. As a result of the study, we found that the use of some waste-to-energy technologies for treating sewage sludge does not lead to the expected reduction in average net energy consumption along with a reduction in waste mass. Based on the research, leading techniques have been identified that make it possible to achieve net zero energy consumption of a wastewater treatment plant. The results of the study are clear and easy to interpret and can be used by managers of different levels to select the most optimal set of technological stages for the treatment and disposal of sewage sludge in accordance with the principles of the circular economy, including reference comparison through the national sectoral benchmarking system.

Suggested Citation

  • A.V. Kiselev & E.R. Magaril & I.S. Glushankova & L.V. Rudakova, 2020. "Analysis of Sewage Sludge Alternatives Towards Circular Economy," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(3), pages 329-347.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:329-347
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2020/04_Kiselev_Magaril_Glushakova_Rudakova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soundararajan, Kamal & Ho, Hiang Kwee & Su, Bin, 2014. "Sankey diagram framework for energy and exergy flows," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1035-1042.
    2. Andrey Kiselev & Elena Magaril & Romen Magaril & Deborah Panepinto & Marco Ravina & Maria Chiara Zanetti, 2019. "Towards Circular Economy: Evaluation of Sewage Sludge Biogas Solutions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Alexey Paukov & Romen Magaril & Elena Magaril, 2019. "An Investigation of the Feasibility of the Organic Municipal Solid Waste Processing by Coking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Marco Ragazzi & Riccardo Catellani & Elena Cristina Rada & Vincenzo Torretta & Xavier Salazar-Valenzuela, 2016. "Management of Urban Wastewater on One of the Galapagos Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Honghua & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng, 2023. "Tracing China's steel use from steel flows in the production system to steel footprints in the consumption system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Xu, Rong-Hong & Zhao, Tian & Ma, Huan & He, Ke-Lun & Lv, Hong-Kun & Guo, Xu-Tao & Chen, Qun, 2023. "Operation optimization of distributed energy systems considering nonlinear characteristics of multi-energy transport and conversion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Marzena Smol, 2020. "Inventory of Wastes Generated in Polish Sewage Sludge Incineration Plants and Their Possible Circular Management Directions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Carmen Ruiz-Puente & Daniel Jato-Espino, 2020. "Systemic Analysis of the Contributions of Co-Located Industrial Symbiosis to Achieve Sustainable Development in an Industrial Park in Northern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Andrés Pazmiño & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Darryl Low Choy, 2018. "Towards Comprehensive Policy Integration for the Sustainability of Small Islands: A Landscape-Scale Planning Approach for the Galápagos Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Kumar, Aman & Singh, Ekta & Mishra, Rahul & Lo, Shang Lien & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Global trends in municipal solid waste treatment technologies through the lens of sustainable energy development opportunity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    8. Cristina Mateus & Melanie Valencia & Kara DiFrancesco & Valeria Ochoa-Herrera & Todd Gartner & Diego Quiroga, 2020. "Governance Mechanisms and Barriers for Achieving Water Quality Improvements in Galapagos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Zhang, Bo & Qu, Xue & Meng, Jing & Sun, Xudong, 2017. "Identifying primary energy requirements in structural path analysis: A case study of China 2012," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 425-435.
    10. Gupta, Akash Som & Khatiwada, Dilip, 2024. "Investigating the sustainability of biogas recovery systems in wastewater treatment plants- A circular bioeconomy approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Diankai Wang & Inna Gryshova & Anush Balian & Mykola Kyzym & Tetiana Salashenko & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olexandr Davidyuk, 2022. "Assessment of Power System Sustainability and Compromises between the Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Ali Chabuk & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Mohammad Ezz-Aldeen & Jan Laue & Roland Pusch & Hussain Musa Hussain & Sven Knutsson, 2018. "Two Scenarios for Landfills Design in Special Conditions Using the HELP Model: A Case Study in Babylon Governorate, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Sakaveli, Foteini & Petala, Maria & Tsiridis, Vasilios & Karas, Panagiotis A. & Karpouzas, Dimitrios G. & Darakas, Efthymios, 2023. "Effect of attapulgite on anaerobic digestion of primary sludge and downstream valorization of produced biosolids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Anna Turek & Kinga Wieczorek & Wojciech M. Wolf, 2019. "Digestion Procedure and Determination of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge—An Analytical Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, March.
    15. Dar, Rouf Ahmad & Tsui, To-Hung & Zhang, Le & Smoliński, Adam & Tong, Yen Wah & Mohamed Rasmey, Abdel-Hamied & Liu, Ronghou, 2025. "Recent achievements in magnetic-field-assisted anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Gonzalez Hernandez, Ana & Lupton, Richard C. & Williams, Chris & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2018. "Control data, Sankey diagrams, and exergy: Assessing the resource efficiency of industrial plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 232-245.
    17. Lingjie Tang & Chang’an Zhang, 2023. "Global Research on International Students’ Intercultural Adaptation in a Foreign Context: A Visualized Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Landscape," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    18. Mahabadipour, Hamidreza & Srinivasan, Kalyan K. & Krishnan, Sundar R., 2019. "An exergy analysis methodology for internal combustion engines using a multi-zone simulation of dual fuel low temperature combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Jianwei Xu & Shuxin Liu, 2024. "Current status, evolutionary path, and development trends of low-carbon technology innovation: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24151-24182, September.
    20. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña, 2021. "Building Exploitation Routines in the Circular Supply Chain to Obtain Radical Innovations," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable development; economic security; assessment; wastewater treatment; sewage sludge; circular economy; key performance indicators; anaerobic digestion; pyrolysis; drying.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:329-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.