IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aii/ijcmss/v3y2012i3p44-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformational Leadership Style and Knowledge Management in the Private Sector Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Latha Raman

    (Lecturer, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, AMA International University, Kingdom of Bahrain)

  • Joji Rajan

    (Lecturer, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, AMA International University, Kingdom of Bahrain)

Abstract

The sustainable competitive advantage of a firm relies on how well the resources of the firm are managed. The leadership role plays an important role in this regard. The modern organizations are such that they are knowledge based; the relevant and actionable knowledge is available and scattered around throughout the organization among the employees; it needs to be distributed to the whole of the organization. Leaders are the one who are able to influence others and who possess managerial authority. Leadership is the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals. Leaders are the one who directs, oversees, communicates and motivates the most valuable resource of an organization that is the human resource that is from different biographies and environment. This study is conducted among one hundred people working in different private sector firms in the Kingdom of Bahrain to find out the relationship between Transformational Leadership Style and Knowledge Management by conducting a survey. The data calculated was analysed using correlation and regression models of statistical tools. The results of the survey showed a significant relationship between the leadership style in knowledge management. The transformational leaders who are generally charismatic and motivate employees by inspiring them, consider them individually, and stimulate their intellectual needs are highly influential among their employees and can lead the work force towards the organizational goals. The firm continues to be successful one provided if the resources are fully utilized and this study identified a positive relation between the leadership style and the knowledge management.

Suggested Citation

  • Latha Raman & Joji Rajan, 2012. "Transformational Leadership Style and Knowledge Management in the Private Sector Firms," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 3(3), pages 44-49, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:44-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/268/261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/268
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boas Shamir & Robert J. House & Michael B. Arthur, 1993. "The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 577-594, November.
    2. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Matthias Meier & Ingo Weller, 2012. "Hat Wissensmanagement eine Zukunft? Stand der Dinge und Ausblick," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 114-135, February.
    3. Pamela Chidiogo Izunwanne, 2017. "Developing an Understanding of Organisational Knowledge Creation: A Review Framework," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    5. Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoît Weil, 2020. "Organiser la création de connaissance pour l’innovation de rupture. Des communautés aux sociétés proto-épistémiques d’experts," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 35-60.
    6. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    7. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    9. Wei-Shong Lin & Jui-Ling Huang & Margaret L. Sheng, 2014. "How the Organizational Goals Affect Knowledge Management," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(1), pages 3-22.
    10. Muhammad Jahanzaib Yousaf & Qamar Ali, 2018. "Impact of Knowledge Management on Innovation: Evidence from a South Asian Country," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    13. Huo, Dong & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2014. "Dilemma in Individual Collaboration for Invention: Should We be Similar or Diverse in Knowledge?," MPRA Paper 56185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2015. "The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 397-415, March.
    15. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    16. Isabel de Sá Affonso da Costa & Elaine Tavares & Arthur Marcelo Nicolau Peixoto, 2016. "Knowledge Creation in Hybrid Organisations: A Case Study in a Quasi-Governmental Organisation," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Chila, Vilma, 2021. "Knowledge dynamics in employee entrepreneurship : Implications for parents and offspring," Other publications TiSEM a1f5d18c-783b-4af6-8414-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Kodama, Mitsuru & Hirose, Ayano & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2014. "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-146.
    19. McCarthy, Killian J & Aalbers, Hendrik Leendert, 2022. "Alliance-to-acquisition transitions: The technological performance implications of acquiring one's alliance partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    20. Wang, Yanping & Gao, Jie & Wei, Zelong, 2022. "The double-edged sword of servitization in radical product innovation: The role of latent needs identification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:44-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mr. Asif Anjum (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.