IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/saebjn/v66y2019i1p85-100n131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees´ Creativity Development within Innovative Processes of Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Lušňáková
  • Zuzana JurÃ­Ä ková
  • Mária Å ajbidorová
  • Silvia LenÄ Ã©Å¡ová

Abstract

Business practice requires creativity to be considered an important part of management because innovation is the result of it. The aim of the paper is to find out how is the creativity of employees supported in food enterprises in Slovakia. After evaluating the information obtained from structured interview and questionnaire based on the 5-degree Likert scale, there were used one way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test as well as Cronbach alpha and Spearman's correlation tests. The survey also highlighted the significant innovation potential of food enterprises in Slovakia. Innovation and creativity development activities can be stimulated through the use of various techniques, with some having a specific effect on a subset of innovation types and others being applicable to a wide variety of innovations. JEL Codes - M12; O35

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Lušňáková & Zuzana JurÃ­Ä ková & Mária Å ajbidorová & Silvia LenÄ Ã©Å¡ová, 2019. "Employees´ Creativity Development within Innovative Processes of Enterprise," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(1), pages 85-100, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:66:y:2019:i:1:p:85-100:n:131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1109
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarooghi, Hessamoddin & Libaers, Dirk & Burkemper, Andrew, 2015. "Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 714-731.
    2. Viktoria Ali Taha & Michaela Sirkova & Martina Ferencova, 2016. "The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Creativity And Innovation," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(1), pages 7-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    2. Yoon, Hyungseok (David) & Boudreaux, Christopher & Kim, Namil, 2024. "Connecting the dots between democracy and innovation: The role of pro-market institutions and information processing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    3. Marco Caliendo & Daniel Rodríguez, 2024. "Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes: non-linearities and the moderating role of experience," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1523-1553, April.
    4. Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Zhu, Lily Yuxuan & Bauman, Christopher W. & Young, Maia J, 2023. "Unlocking creative potential: Reappraising emotional events facilitates creativity for conventional thinkers," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Stefan VLADUTESCU, 2018. "Six Steps of Hermeneutical Process at H.-G. Gadamer," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 161-174, June.
    7. Bianca TEODORESCU, 2018. "An Analysis of Easter as a Method of Preserving Romanian Traditions," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Veaceslav MANOLACHI & Cristian Mihail RUS & Svetlana RUSNAC (ed.), New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 42, pages 484-492, Editura Lumen.
    8. Khan, Zaheer & Lew, Yong Kyu & Marinova, Svetla, 2019. "Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies: The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 499-512.
    9. Zhanna Mingaleva & Elena Shironina & Elena Lobova & Vasiliy Olenev & Lyubov Plyusnina & Anna Oborina, 2022. "Organizational Culture Management as an Element of Innovative and Sustainable Development of Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Adnane Chader & Dahn Ovono Beyeme, 2019. "Créativité organisationnelle et compétences émotionnelles," Post-Print hal-03185402, HAL.
    11. Herlina Lusmeida & Yvonne Augustine, 2022. "The effect of enterprise risks management, innovation towards sustainable finance moderated by intellectual capital," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 29(1), pages 481-496, March.
    12. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Reframing a Novel Decentralized Knowledge Management Concept as a Desirable Vision: As We May Realize the Memex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    13. Oprea-Valentin BUȘU & Antonia-Ioana LUCHICI, 2017. "Particularities Of Organizational Commitment In The Specific Culture Of The Romanian Companies," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 4(1), pages 98-113, August.
    14. Elisa Salvador & Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi, 2019. "Facing disruption: the cinema value chain in the digital age," Post-Print hal-02300929, HAL.
    15. Jonas Hermann Schulze & Felix Pinkow, 2020. "Leadership for Organisational Adaptability: How Enabling Leaders Create Adaptive Space," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Virgile Chassagnon & Naciba Haned & Christian Le Bas, 2016. "The Determinants Of Organisational Creativity Methods: An Empirical Study Based On A French Survey," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Lee, Kyootai & Jung, Hyun Ju, 2024. "What makes universities build academic spin-offs more successfully? A theory-based triangulation of quantitative studies based on meta-analyses," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    18. Alessandra Tognazzo & Paola Angela Maria Mazzurana, 2017. "Friends doing business. An Explorative Longitudinal Case Study of Creativity and Innovation in an Italian Technology-Based Start-Up," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 77-103.
    19. Imran M. Ilyas & Nadine Kammerlander & Roxana Turturea & Marc van Essen, 2024. "When Business Model Innovation Creates Value for Companies: A Meta‐Analysis on Institutional Contingencies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1825-1883, July.
    20. Lee, Junyong & Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl & Shin, Donglim, 2024. "Religion and corporate innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    creativity; employees; food enterprises; innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:66:y:2019:i:1:p:85-100:n:131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.