IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/saebjn/v63y2016i3p391-414n45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Or Rational? The Determination Of The Influence Of Advertising Appeal On Advertising Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Viktorija GRIGALIUNAITE
  • Lina PILELIENE

Abstract

In prevailing competition-based market economy, organizations have to search factors influencing advertising effectiveness. This research aims at developing the model of the influence of advertising appeal on advertising effectiveness. While achieving the aim of the article, the analysis and synthesis of scientific literature is provided. Furthermore, traditional marketing research methods as well as neuromarketing research methods are applied in order to determine the influences of different advertising appeals on advertising effectiveness. As a research result, the model of the influence of advertising appeal on advertising effectiveness is elaborated. Accordingly, this research fills the gap in scientific literature by determining the influences of emotional and rational appeals on print / outdoor advertising effectiveness in the context of convenience product category. Moreover, by answering the research question, the contribution to the field emerges in integrating both marketing theory and neuroscience in order to analyze and evaluate consumer behavior. JEL Codes - M310, M390

Suggested Citation

  • Viktorija GRIGALIUNAITE & Lina PILELIENE, 2016. "Emotional Or Rational? The Determination Of The Influence Of Advertising Appeal On Advertising Effectiveness," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 63(3), pages 391-414, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:63:y:2016:i:3:p:391-414:n:45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1030
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan Yu Chang & I Ying Chang, 2014. "The Influences of Humorous Advertising on Brand Popularity and Advertising Effects in the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina PilelienÄ— & Ahmed H. Alsharif & Ibrahim Bader Alharbi, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis Of Scientific Literature On Neuromarketing Tools In Advertising," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(5).
    2. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Mazilah Abdullah & Ahmad Khraiwish & Azmirul Ashaari, 2023. "Neuromarketing Tools Used in the Marketing Mix: A Systematic Literature and Future Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grigaliunaite Viktorija & Pileliene Lina, 2016. "Emotional or Rational? The Determination of the Influence of Advertising Appeal on Advertising Effectiveness," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 391-414, November.
    2. Hayk Khachatryan & Alicia Rihn & Ben Campbell & Bridget Behe & Charles Hall, 2018. "How do consumer perceptions of “local†production benefits influence their visual attention to state marketing programs?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 390-406, March.
    3. Orquin, Jacob L. & Bagger, Martin P. & Lahm, Erik S. & Grunert, Klaus G. & Scholderer, Joachim, 2020. "The visual ecology of product packaging and its effects on consumer attention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 187-195.
    4. Hameed, Irfan & Zainab, Bibi & Shamim, Syed Jazib, 2018. "Arousal Safety Leading to Purchase Intention; The Role of Moderating and Mediating Variables in Structural Model," MPRA Paper 91848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    6. Pieters, Rik & Wedel, Michel, 2020. "Heads up: Head movements during ad exposure respond to consumer goals and predict brand memory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 281-289.
    7. Thomas O. Meservy & Matthew L. Jensen & Kelly J. Fadel, 2014. "Evaluation of Competing Candidate Solutions in Electronic Networks of Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 15-34, March.
    8. Lina Pilelienė & Viktorija Grigaliūnaitė, 2016. "Influence of print advertising layout complexity on visual attention," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 237-251, August.
    9. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2015. "Standardization and the Effectiveness of Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2707-2719, November.
    10. Salvatore Piccolo & Piero Tedeschi & Giovanni Ursino, 2018. "Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1291-1310, March.
    11. Ali, Mazhar, 2016. "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 916-932.
    12. Couwenberg, Linda E. & Boksem, Maarten A.S. & Dietvorst, Roeland C. & Worm, Loek & Verbeke, Willem J.M.I. & Smidts, Ale, 2017. "Neural responses to functional and experiential ad appeals: Explaining ad effectiveness," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 355-366.
    13. Serhat Peker & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Yavuz İnal, 2021. "The Effects of the Content Elements of Online Banner Ads on Visual Attention: Evidence from An-Eye-Tracking Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Jiwon Lee & Inwon Kang & Joseph Stanfield, 2017. "Coercive Tactics and Web Advertising Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Viktorija Grigaliūnaitė & Lina Pilelienė, 2017. "Consumer Attention Online: How to be Visible?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 30-44.
    16. Alicia L. Rihn & Chengyan Yue, 2016. "Visual Attention's Influence on Consumers’ Willingness‐to‐Pay for Processed Food Products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 314-328, July.
    17. Peter Stüttgen & Peter Boatwright & Robert T. Monroe, 2012. "A Satisficing Choice Model," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 878-899, November.
    18. Mary-Ann Cooper & Raquel Camprubí & Erdogan Koc & Ralf Buckley, 2021. "Digital Destination Matching: Practices, Priorities and Predictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    19. Moldovan, Sarit & Steinhart, Yael & Lehmann, Donald R., 2019. "Propagators, Creativity, and Informativeness: What Helps Ads Go Viral," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-114.
    20. Jung Eun Lee & Songyee Hur & Brandi Watkins, 2018. "Visual communication of luxury fashion brands on social media: effects of visual complexity and brand familiarity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 449-462, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:63:y:2016:i:3:p:391-414:n:45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.