IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v111y2020icp249-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attention, memory and preference for direct and indirect print advertisements

Author

Listed:
  • Simola, Jaana
  • Kuisma, Jarmo
  • Kaakinen, Johanna K.

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of direct and indirect advertising. Direct ads openly depict advertised products and brands. In indirect ads, the ad message requires elaboration. Eye movements were recorded while consumers viewed direct and indirect advertisements under fixed (5 s) or unlimited exposure time. Recognition of ads, brand logos and preference for brands were tested under two different delays (after 24 h or 45 min) from the ad exposure. The total viewing time was longer for the indirect ads when exposure time was unlimited. Overall, ad pictorials received more fixations and the brand preference was higher in the indirect condition. Recognition improved for brand logos of indirect ads when tested after the shorter delay. Consumers experienced indirect ads as more original, surprising, intellectually challenging and harder to interpret than direct ads. Current results indicate that indirect ads elicit cognitive elaboration that translates into higher preference and memorability for brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Simola, Jaana & Kuisma, Jarmo & Kaakinen, Johanna K., 2020. "Attention, memory and preference for direct and indirect print advertisements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 249-261.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:111:y:2020:i:c:p:249-261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319303881
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gesche M Huebner & Karl R Gegenfurtner, 2012. "Conceptual and Visual Features Contribute to Visual Memory for Natural Images," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lourenção, Marina & de Moura Engracia Giraldi, Janaina & de Oliveira, Jorge Henrique Caldeira, 2020. "Destination advertisement semiotic signs: Analysing tourists' visual attention and perceived ad effectiveness," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Jun, Yesel & Lee, Hyunju, 2022. "A sound brand identity design: The interplay between sound symbolism and typography on brand attitude and memory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Benoit, Ilgım Dara & Miller, Elizabeth G., 2022. "Enhancing creativity perception through fear," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1084-1098.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    2. Pieters, Rik & Wedel, Michel, 2020. "Heads up: Head movements during ad exposure respond to consumer goals and predict brand memory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 281-289.
    3. Alicia L. Rihn & Chengyan Yue, 2016. "Visual Attention's Influence on Consumers’ Willingness‐to‐Pay for Processed Food Products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 314-328, July.
    4. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    5. Grigaliunaite Viktorija & Pileliene Lina, 2016. "Emotional or Rational? The Determination of the Influence of Advertising Appeal on Advertising Effectiveness," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 391-414, November.
    6. Syed Mohd Muneeb & Ahmad Yusuf Adhami & Zainab Asim & Syed Aqib Jalil, 2019. "Bi-level decision making models for advertising allocation problem under fuzzy environment," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 160-172, April.
    7. Vassiliki Grougiou & George Balabanis & Danae Manika, 2020. "Does Humour Influence Perceptions of the Ethicality of Female-Disparaging Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Husić-Mehmedović, Melika & Omeragić, Ismir & Batagelj, Zenel & Kolar, Tomaž, 2017. "Seeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 145-154.
    9. Dass, Mayukh & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Kumar, Piyush & Thomas, Sunil, 2014. "A study of the antecedents of slogan liking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2504-2511.
    10. Rihn, Alicia & Wei, Xuan & Khachatryan, Hayk, 2019. "Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Pérez-Gladish, B. & Gonzalez, I. & Bilbao-Terol, A. & Arenas-Parra, M., 2010. "Planning a TV advertising campaign: A crisp multiobjective programming model from fuzzy basic data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 84-94, February.
    12. Marion Garaus, 2020. "The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 244-259, December.
    13. Katare, Bhagyashree, 2013. "Consumer willingness to pay for nano-packaged food products: evidence from experimental auctions and visual processing data," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 162233, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    14. Georgios Halkias & Flora Kokkinaki, 2010. "Attention, Memory, and Evaluation of Schema Incongruent Brand Messages. An Empirical Study," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 032, University of Siena.
    15. Lina Pilelienė & Viktorija Grigaliūnaitė, 2016. "Influence of print advertising layout complexity on visual attention," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 237-251, August.
    16. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2015. "Standardization and the Effectiveness of Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2707-2719, November.
    17. Viktorija Grigaliūnaitė & Lina Pilelienė, 2017. "Consumer Attention Online: How to be Visible?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 30-44.
    18. Jung Eun Lee & Songyee Hur & Brandi Watkins, 2018. "Visual communication of luxury fashion brands on social media: effects of visual complexity and brand familiarity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 449-462, September.
    19. Christine Bauer & Christine Strauss, 2016. "Location-based advertising on mobile devices," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 159-194, June.
    20. Miniard, Paul W. & Alvarez, Cecilia M.O. & Mohammed, Shazad M., 2020. "Consumer acceptance of brand extensions: Is parental fit preeminent?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:111:y:2020:i:c:p:249-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.