IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v34y2023i1d10.1007_s11002-022-09627-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advertising creativity and its effects: a meta-analysis of the moderating role of modality

Author

Listed:
  • William K. Darley

    (University of Toledo)

  • Jeen-Su Lim

    (University of Toledo)

Abstract

Given the media’s changing landscape for advertising, an examination of advertising creativity and its media interaction takes on increasing importance. Accordingly, we investigate within a meta-analytic framework the moderating role of media type (i.e., traditional/non-traditional) in the relationship between advertising creativity and its effects. The analysis covers 48 papers with 298 data points. First, the meta-analytic findings indicate that ad creativity is positively related to cognition, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Second, the type of media moderates the relationship between ad creativity and its effects. Specifically, the results show that for cognition, print media exhibits a larger impact than TV and non-traditional media. For affect, there is a significant difference in the influence of print versus non-traditional media and TV versus non-traditional media. Non-traditional media produces a smaller impact than print and TV media. For conation, a comparison of TV versus non-traditional media reveals a significant difference in impact. TV media shows a larger impact than non-traditional media. Given that the motivation, opportunity, and ability to process creative ads in traditional and non-traditional media may differ, we present several directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • William K. Darley & Jeen-Su Lim, 2023. "Advertising creativity and its effects: a meta-analysis of the moderating role of modality," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 99-111, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:34:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-022-09627-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-022-09627-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-022-09627-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-022-09627-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiemiao Chen & Robert E. Smith, 2018. "The boundaries for ad creativity: effects of type of divergence and brand processing and responses," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 561-576, November.
    2. Brett R. Gordon & Florian Zettelmeyer & Neha Bhargava & Dan Chapsky, 2019. "A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, March.
    3. Brown, Steven P & Stayman, Douglas M, 1992. "Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 34-51, June.
    4. Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2009. "Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 935-949, 09-10.
    5. Michael Braun & Wendy W. Moe, 2013. "Online Display Advertising: Modeling the Effects of Multiple Creatives and Individual Impression Histories," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 753-767, September.
    6. Ali, Mazhar, 2016. "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 916-932.
    7. Lee, Yih Hwai & Mason, Charlotte, 1999. "Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(2), pages 156-169, September.
    8. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    9. Dass, Mayukh & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Kumar, Piyush & Thomas, Sunil, 2014. "A study of the antecedents of slogan liking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2504-2511.
    10. Robert E. Smith & Scott B. MacKenzie & Xiaojing Yang & Laura M. Buchholz & William K. Darley, 2007. "Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 819-833, 11-12.
    11. Mazerant, Komala & Willemsen, Lotte M. & Neijens, Peter C. & van Noort, Guda, 2021. "Spot-On Creativity: Creativity Biases and Their Differential Effects on Consumer Responses in (Non-)Real-Time Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 15-31.
    12. Chandan A. Chavadi & M J Arul & Monika Sirothiya, 2020. "Modelling the Effects of Creative Advertisements on Consumers: An Empirical Study," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 269-283, September.
    13. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    14. Lee, Jieun & Hong, Ilyoo B., 2016. "Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 360-373.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaetano Miceli & Maria Antonietta Raimondo, 2020. "Creativity in the marketing and consumer behavior literature: a structured review and a research agenda," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 85-124, March.
    2. Jiemiao Chen & Robert E. Smith, 2018. "The boundaries for ad creativity: effects of type of divergence and brand processing and responses," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 561-576, November.
    3. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    4. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    5. Mazerant, Komala & Willemsen, Lotte M. & Neijens, Peter C. & van Noort, Guda, 2021. "Spot-On Creativity: Creativity Biases and Their Differential Effects on Consumer Responses in (Non-)Real-Time Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 15-31.
    6. Maria Mercanti-Guérin & Christophe Bezes, 2010. "La créativité publicitaire représente-t-elle un danger pour les marques ?," Post-Print hal-02056938, HAL.
    7. Wajid, Anees & Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa & Ahmed, Qazi Mohammed & Ahmad, Mansoor, 2021. "Observing viewers’ self-reported and neurophysiological responses to message appeal in social media advertisements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Bilby, Julie & Reid, Mike & Brennan, Linda & Chen, Jiemiao, 2020. "Tiers and fears: An investigation of the impact of city tiers and uncertainty avoidance on Chinese consumer response to creative advertising," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 332-348.
    9. Shukla, Paurav & Singh, Jaywant & Wang, Weisha, 2022. "The influence of creative packaging design on customer motivation to process and purchase decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 338-347.
    10. Tjaša Alegro & Maja Turnšek, 2020. "Striving to Be Different but Becoming the Same: Creativity and Destination Brands’ Promotional Videos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Mai, Robert & Hutter, Katharina, 2014. "Non-Linear Effects of Absurdity in Advertising," EconStor Preprints 96480, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Ali, Mazhar, 2016. "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 916-932.
    13. Hutter, Katharina & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2014. "Surprise, Surprise. Ambient Media as Promotion Tool for Retailers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 93-110.
    14. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A., 2015. "Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2484-2493.
    15. Dass, Mayukh & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Kumar, Piyush & Thomas, Sunil, 2014. "A study of the antecedents of slogan liking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2504-2511.
    16. Georgios Halkias & Flora Kokkinaki, 2010. "Attention, Memory, and Evaluation of Schema Incongruent Brand Messages. An Empirical Study," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 032, University of Siena.
    17. Cheung, Man Lai & Leung, Wilson K.S. & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Koay, Kian Yeik, 2022. "“I follow what you post!†: The role of social media influencers’ content characteristics in consumers' online brand-related activities (COBRAs)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Hutter, Katharina, 2014. "Unusual Location and Unexpected Execution in Advertising: Content Analysis and Test of Effectiveness in Ambient Advertisements," EconStor Preprints 97306, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Dobin Yim & Timothy Malefyt & Jiban Khuntia, 2021. "Is a picture worth a thousand views? Measuring the effects of travel photos on user engagement using deep learning algorithms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 619-637, September.
    20. Thales Teixeira & Rosalind Picard & Rana el Kaliouby, 2014. "Why, When, and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements? A Web-Based Facial Tracking Field Study," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 809-827, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:34:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-022-09627-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.