IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/thkase/344196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Perception and Willingness to Pay for Organic Vegetables in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR

Author

Listed:
  • Chanthavong, Inta
  • Sombounsack, Nouansisavad
  • Pensupar, Kampanat
  • Sengsouriya, Phoudthavong

Abstract

Organic vegetables play a vital role in reducing exposure to harmful substances in food. This study aimed to assess consumer perceptions and willingness to pay (WTP) for organic vegetables, and identify factors influencing respondents' WTP for such vegetables in Savannakhet province, Lao PDR. A total of 368 respondents participated, with data collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, contingent valuation method, and logit models were employed for analysis. Results indicated that 60.30% of tested fresh vegetables were free from chemical contamination and toxins. High and moderate levels of chemical contamination were observed in only 6.25% and 25% of fresh vegetables, respectively. Approximately 35.29% of consumers reported regular weekly purchases of organic vegetables, with an average consumption of 3.78±2.45 kg/week, priced between 0.37 USD and 3.09 USD. Organic vegetables were favored for their perceived health benefits and quality, with 98.53% of consumers expressing future demand. The mean WTP for organic vegetables was found to be 1.14 USD per 1 kg. Bid premiums negatively impacted WTP for lettuce, morning glory, and mint products, while occupation exhibited a negative correlation with WTP for Chinese cabbage and onion.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanthavong, Inta & Sombounsack, Nouansisavad & Pensupar, Kampanat & Sengsouriya, Phoudthavong, 2023. "Consumer Perception and Willingness to Pay for Organic Vegetables in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 31(01), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:344196
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344196/files/Inta%20Chanthavong.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owusu, Victor & Owusu Anifori, Michael, 2013. "Consumer Willingness to Pay a Premium for Organic Fruit and Vegetable in Ghana," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(01), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Rachel Griffith & Lars Nesheim, 2008. "Household willingness to pay for organic products," CeMMAP working papers CWP18/08, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Anetta Barska, 2021. "Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seck, Abdoulaye & Thiam, Djiby Racine, 2022. "Understanding consumer attitudes to and valuation of organic food in Sub-Saharan Africa: A double-bound contingent method applied in Dakar, Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(01), March.
    2. Umar Nawaz Kayani & Anamul Haque & Umme Kulsum & Nishat Taslin Mohona & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "Modeling the Antecedents of Green Consumption Values to Promote the Green Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. repec:zib:zbseps:v:2:y:2022:2:1:p:44-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jing Shao, 2019. "Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1507-1517, December.
    5. Kucher Anatolii & Heldak Maria & Kucher Lesia & Fedorchenko Olha & Yurchenko Yuliia, 2019. "Consumer willingness to pay a price premium for ecological goods: a case study from Ukraine," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 38-49, March.
    6. Sławomir Kalinowski & Aleksandra Łuczak & Adam Koziolek, 2022. "The Social Dimension of Security: The Dichotomy of Respondents’ Perceptions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Chun-Wei Chen, 2023. "A Feasibility Discussion: Is ML Suitable for Predicting Sustainable Patterns in Consumer Product Preferences?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Toker Doganoglu & Firat Inceoglu, 2015. "Product Bans May Benefit Consumers: Implications from a New Model Of Vertical Product Differentiation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 155-180, June.
    9. Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache & Céline Bonnet, 2013. "Organic label and profits sharing in the French fluid milk market [Label Bio et partage des profits sur le marché du lait liquide en France]," Post-Print hal-02746459, HAL.
    10. Ramona Weinrich & Annabell Franz & Achim Spiller, 2016. "Multi-level labelling: too complex for consumers?," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 18(2), pages 155-172.
    11. Julia Kleineidam, 2022. "Distinguishing Organisational Profiles of Food Loss Management in Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Govindasamy, Ramu & Gao, Qun & Heckman, Joseph & Vellangany,Isaac & VanVranken, Richard, 2020. "Characteristics of Consumers Who Are Willing to Buy Certified Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(3), July.
    13. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Mariusz Malinowski, 2021. "An Attempt to Apply Canonical Analysis to Investigate the Dependencies between the Level of Organic Farming Development in Poland and the Chosen Environmental Determinants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Catarina Roseira & Sandrina Teixeira & Belem Barbosa & Rita Macedo, 2022. "How Collectivism Affects Organic Food Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Study with Norwegian and Portuguese Young Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. James J. Heckman & Rosa L. Matzkin & Lars Nesheim, 2010. "Nonparametric Identification and Estimation of Nonadditive Hedonic Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1569-1591, September.
    16. Céline Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Organic Label, Bargaining Power, and Profit-sharing in the French Fluid Milk Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 113-133.
    17. Fanqi Zou & Tinghui Li, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Ecological Capital Investment on the Development of Green Circular Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Astrid Matthey & Tim Kasser, 2013. "Values, food and bags: A study of consumption decisions in a laboratory supermarket," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-007, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    19. Jana Kliestikova, 2017. "Greenwashing and Its Impact on Consumer Confidence � Case Study of Slovak Republic," GATR Journals jmmr122, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    20. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Conventional or Organic? Motives and Trends in Polish Vegetable Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    21. Anna Mazurek-Kusiak & Bogusław Sawicki & Agata Kobyłka, 2021. "Contemporary Challenges to the Organic Farming: A Polish and Hungarian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:344196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/darkuth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.