IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/stagec/149411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Old institutions, new challenges: the agricultural knowledge system in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Nemes, Gusztáv
  • High, Christopher

Abstract

This paper explores and analyses the Hungarian institutional system for the creation and the transfer of knowledge in the field of agriculture and rural development. We consider the constitution and operation of the Agricultural Knowledge System (AKS) in Hungary, focussing on the formally organised aspects, and suggest that both the structure and content of the knowledge needed in the sector have significantly changed during the past decades. These changes, especially in relation to the sustainability of agriculture, pose significant challenges to traditional AKS institutions, which often have failed to change in line with the new requirements. Based on a literature review, interviews and a national stakeholder workshop, we offer an analysis of Hungarian AKS institutions, their co-ordination, co-operation and communication with each other and with Hungarian rurality, and of the arising issues and problems concerning the creation and the flow of knowledge needed for sustainable agriculture. We also briefly explore characteristics of emerging bottom-up structures, called LINSAS (learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture), and explore the significance of the findings in this article for the study of AKS in Europe. This article is based on preliminary results of the SOLINSA research project, supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemes, Gusztáv & High, Christopher, 2013. "Old institutions, new challenges: the agricultural knowledge system in Hungary," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:149411
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149411/files/05-1303-nemes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.149411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Brunori & Dominique Barjolle & Anne-Charlotte Dockes & Simone Helmle & Julie Ingram & Laurens Klerkx & Heidrun Moschitz & Gusztáv Nemes & Talis Tisenkopfs, 2013. "CAP Reform and Innovation: The Role of Learning and Innovation Networks," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 12(2), pages 27-33, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylvain Quiédeville & Jean-Baptiste Bassene & Frédéric Lançon & Didier Chabrol & Paule Moustier, 2018. "Systemic Sustainability of the French Organic Rice and PGI Einkorn Value Chains: A Preliminary Assessment Based on Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Katona-Kovacs, Judit, 2014. "Where to put the focus in rural development? Changing the focus from funding to learning," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(1), pages 1-8, April.
    3. Katona-Kovacs, Judit & Bóta-Horváth, Noémi, 2014. "Corporate Innovation a Missing Success Factor of Rural Development – Lessons Learned from the Past Decade," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 169796, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Zsófia Benedek & Pál Géza Balogh & Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő & Veronika Lajos & Éva Orbán & Gábor G. Szabó & Gusztáv Nemes, 2020. "The Kings of the Corona Crisis: The Impact of the outbreak of Covid‐19 on Small‐scale Producers in Hungary," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(3), pages 53-59, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knickel, Karlheinz, 2016. "Trajectories of agricultural modernization and rural resilience: Some first insights derived from case studies in 14 countries," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Taishykov, Zhandos & Tolysbayeva, Madina & Zhumanazarov, Kassymkhan & Ibraimova, Saule & Mizambekova, Zhamilya, 2024. "Management of innovation processes in agriculture," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Natalia Molina & Gianluca Brunori & Elena Favilli & Stefano Grando & Patrizia Proietti, 2021. "Farmers’ Participation in Operational Groups to Foster Innovation in the Agricultural Sector: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Turner, James A. & Klerkx, Laurens & White, Toni & Nelson, Tracy & Everett-Hincks, Julie & Mackay, Alec & Botha, Neels, 2017. "Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: How projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 503-523.
    5. Kummer, Susanne & Leitgeb, Friedrich & Vogl, Christian R., 2017. "Farmers’ Own Research: Organic Farmers’ Experiments in Austria and Implications for Agricultural Innovation Systems," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), February.
    6. Heidrun Moschitz & Adrian Muller & Ursula Kretzschmar & Lisa Haller & Miguel de Porras & Catherine Pfeifer & Bernadette Oehen & Helga Willer & Hanna Stolz, 2021. "How can the EU Farm to Fork strategy deliver on its organic promises? Some critical reflections," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(1), pages 30-36, April.
    7. Nemes, Gusztav & Varga, Agnes & High, Chris, 2014. "The evolution of the Hungarian agricultural knowledge system (AKS) since the EU enlargement," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 169086, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Ingram, Julie & Dwyer, Janet & Gaskell, Peter & Mills, Jane & Wolf, Pieter de, 2018. "Reconceptualising translation in agricultural innovation: A co-translation approach to bring research knowledge and practice closer together," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 38-51.
    9. Adanella Rossi, 2020. "From Co-Learning to Shared Commitment to Agroecology. Some Insights from Initiatives Aimed at Reintroducing Agrobiodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Martina Schäfer, 2019. "Establishing ethical organic poultry production: a question of successful cooperation management?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 315-327, June.
    11. Skaalsveen, Kamilla & Ingram, Julie & Urquhart, Julie, 2020. "The role of farmers' social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Contesse, Maria & Duncan, Jessica & Legun, Katharine & Klerkx, Laurens, 2021. "Unravelling non-human agency in sustainability transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Arzeni, Andrea & Ascione, Elisa & Borsotto, Patrizia & Carta, Valentina & Castellotti, Tatiana & Vagnozzi, Anna, 2021. "Analysis of farms characteristics related to innovation needs: a proposal for supporting the public decision-making process," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:149411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akiiihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.