IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polvaa/345027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial conflicts. Between the geographical-economic and legal dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Czarnecki, Adam
  • Nowak, Maciej J.

Abstract

In recent decades, spatial conflicts have become a significant research problem undertaken by representatives of various scientific disciplines. However, the diversity of theories and methods of analyzing conflicts has created methodological barriers between disciplines, limiting the transfer of knowledge and hindering the integration of research results. The scientific literature on spatial conflicts is dominated by the works of geographers and planners, for whom geographical space is a key research perspective. At the same time, basing the analysis of conflicts solely on the legal aspect excessively focuses attention on legal regulations at the expense of other important factors - economic, social and geographical. The aim of the article was to recognize how the legal aspect is taken into account in the key geographical and economic concepts used in the study of spatial conflicts. Reference was made to rural areas and agricultural land, which, due to their important function in providing society with food and numerous public goods, must be treated as a special resource requiring legal protection. Key theoretical and research challenges in the analysis of spatial conflicts have been identified, as well as the relationships between the two approaches to this type of conflict. Directions for the possible treatment of spatial conflicts in spatial planning law have been identified. It has been shown that geographical and economic theories and concepts can be useful in shaping spatial planning legislation, thus taking into account changing land use patterns and socio-economic processes and phenomena expressed in increasingly common spatial conflicts. The research results described in this article were financed by the National Science Centre (project: "Multifunctionality and value of agricultural land – rational use and conflicts of interest", no. 2018/29/B/HS4/01354).

Suggested Citation

  • Czarnecki, Adam & Nowak, Maciej J., 2024. "Spatial conflicts. Between the geographical-economic and legal dimensions," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 203(2), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:polvaa:345027
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345027/files/2_Czarnecki_Nowak.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Torre & Muazzam Sabir & Haï-Vu Pham, 2021. "Socioeconomic conflicts and land-use issues in context of infrastructural projects," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 241-260, February.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12867 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, December.
    4. Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Zawalińska, Katarzyna & Czarnecki, Adam, 2018. "Land-use conflicts and the Common Agricultural Policy: Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 423-433.
    5. Pierre BAUBY, 2018. "Conditions of convergence between public economy and social economy organisations. From the diversity of models to a successful hybridisation through new governance," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 283-299, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:ijag24:345027 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:ags:ijag24:345025 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nowak, Maciej J. & Czarnecki, Adam, 2024. "From the editors of the issue," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 203(2), July.
    4. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    5. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    6. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    7. Primmer, Eeva & Kyllonen, Simo, 2006. "Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 838-853, November.
    8. Liz Barry, 2022. "Community science and the design of climate governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    10. Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Moulaert & Jan Schreurs & Konrad Miciukiewicz, 2014. "Integrative Spatial Quality: A Relational Epistemology of Space and Transdisciplinarity in Urban Design and Planning," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 393-411, August.
    11. Füg, Franz & Ibert, Oliver, 2020. "Assembling social innovations in emergent professional communities. The case of learning region policies in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 541-562.
    12. Crystal Legacy & Ryan van den Nouwelant, 2015. "Negotiating Strategic Planning's Transitional Spaces: The Case of ‘Guerrilla Governance’ in Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 209-226, January.
    13. Peter Munthe-Kaas, 2015. "Agonism and co-design of urban spaces," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 218-237, July.
    14. Peter Dithan Ntale & Jude Ssempebwa & Badiru Musisi & Genza Gyaviira Musoke & Kimoga Joseph & C. B. Mugimu & Ngoma Muhammed & Joseph Ntayi, 2020. "Gaps in the structuring of organizations in the graduate employment context in Uganda," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Corianne Payton Scally & J. Rosie Tighe, 2015. "Democracy in Action?: NIMBY as Impediment to Equitable Affordable Housing Siting," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 749-769, July.
    16. Derk Jan Stobbelaar, 2020. "Impact of Student Interventions on Urban Greening Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Patricia Molina Costa, 2014. "From plan to reality: Implementing a community vision in Jackson Square, Boston," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 293-310, September.
    18. Error, Marta, 2019. "Management of agricultural land in Poland in 2000-2018," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 185(4), November.
    19. Lingfang Shao & Zhengxian Liu & Zijin Zhou, 2024. "Examining How Urban Public Spaces and Virtual Spaces Affect Public Opinion in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    21. Einsiedel, Edna F. & Boyd, Amanda D. & Medlock, Jennifer & Ashworth, Peta, 2013. "Assessing socio-technical mindsets: Public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 149-158.
    22. Jongwng Ju & Jaecheol Kim, 2023. "Applying the Delphi Approach to Incorporate Voiceless Stakeholders in Community Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polvaa:345027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irwirpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.